Targeted Pesticide Residue Analysis Using Triple Quad LC-MS/MS

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 747, Issue , 2011, Pages 173-191

  Alder, Lutz ^a  

^a FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

APCI; Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization; Cycle time; Dwell time; Electrospray; ESI; Mass spectrometry; Matrix effects; MS MS; Multi residue methods; Pesticides; Scheduled MRM; SRM

Indexed keywords

PESTICIDE RESIDUE;

ARTICLE; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; PESTICIDE RESIDUES; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 80053072861     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: 19406029     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-136-9_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Tomlin C.D.S. (ed) 2006. The Pesticide Manual-A World Compendium. Fourteenth edition, British Crop Protection Council (BCPC), Hampshire GU34 2QD, UK
2. Pico Y, Blasco C, Font G. (2004) Environmental and food applications of LC-tandem mass spectrometry in pesticide-residue analysis: an overview. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 23, 45–85
3. Alder L,. Greulich K, Kempe G, and Vieth B (2006) Residue Analysis of 500 High Priority Pesticides – better by GC-MS or LC-MS/MS? Mass Spectrom. Rev. 25, 838–865
4. Data Pool of the EU Community Reference Laboratories for Residues of Pesticides: http://www.crl-pesticides-datapool.eu/
5. Kostiainen, R.; Kauppila, T.J. (2009) Effect of eluent on the ionization process in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1216, 685–699
6. http://www.bfr.bund.de/cd/5832
7. Taylor, P. J. (2005) Matrix effects: the Achilles heel of quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray–tandem mass spectrometry. Clinical Biochemistry 38, 328–334
8. Bruins, A. P. (1998) Mechanistic aspects of electrospray ionization. J. Chromatogr. A 794, 345–357
9. Enke, C. G. (1997) A predictive model for matrix and analyte effects in electrospray ionization of singly-charged ionic analytes. Anal. Chem., 69, 4885–4893
10. Cech, N. B.; Enke, C. G. (2001) Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 20, 362–368
11. King, R.; Bonfiglio, R.; Fernandez-Metzler, C.; Miller-Stein, C.; Olah, T. (2000) Mechanistic investigation of ionization suppression in electrospray ionization. J. Amer. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11, 942–950
12. Method validation and quality control procedures for pesticide residue analysis in food and feed; Document N° SANCO/2007/3131; http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/resources/qualcontrol_en.pdf
13. Rychlik M and Asam S (2008) Stable isotope dilution assays in mycotoxin analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 390, 617–628
14. Benijts T, Dams R, Lambert W, and De Leenheer A (2004) Countering matrix effects in environmental liquid chromatography– electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry water analysis for endocrine disrupting chemicals. J. Chromatogr. A 1029, 153–159
15. Lindegardh N, Annerberg A, White NJ, and Day NPJ (2008) Development and validation of a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method for determination of piper-aquine in plasma Stable isotope labeled internal standard does not always compensate for matrix effects. J. Chromatogr. B 862, 227–236
16. Wang S, Cyronak M, and Yang E (2007) Does a stable isotopically labeled internal standard always correct analyte response?: A matrix effect study on a LC/MS/MS method for the determination of carvedilol enantiomers in human plasma. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 43, 701–707
17. Stahnke H, Reemtsma T, Alder L (2009) Compensation of Matrix Effects by Postcolumn Infusion of a Monitor Substance in Multiresidue Analysis with LC–MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 81, 2185–2192