Innovation systems as patent networks: The Netherlands, India and Nanotech

Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Dolfsma, Wilfred ^a   Leydesdorff, Loet ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Innovation systems; National innovation system; Networks; Patent networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053058090     PISSN: 14479338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/impp.2011.13.3.311     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Arundel, A. & I. Kabla (1998) 'What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms' Research Policy 27: 127-41.
2. Balzat M. & H. Hanusch (2004) 'Recent trends in the research on national innovation Systems' Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14(2): 197-210.
3. Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlson, S. Lindmark & A. Rickne (2008) 'Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis' Research Policy 37: 407-29.
4. Bittlingmayer, G. (1988) 'Property rights, progress, and the aircraft patent agreement' Journal of Law and Economics 31(1): 227-248.
5. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. & F. Malerba (2003) 'Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification' Research Policy 32(1): 69-87.
6. Cantner, U. & H. Graf (2006) 'The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis' Research Policy 35(4): 463-80.
7. Carlsson, B., S. Jacobsson, M. Holmén & A. Rickne (2002) 'Innovation Systems: analytical and methodological issues' Research Policy 31: 233-45.
8. Carlsson, B. & R. Stankiewicz (1991) 'On the Nature, Function, and Composition of Technological systems' Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1: 93-118.
9. Chittoor, R., M.B. Sarkar, S. Ray & P.S. Aulakh (2009) 'Third-World Copycats to Emerging Multinationals: Institutional Changes and Organizational Transformation in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry' Organization Science 20(1): 187-205.
10. Criscuolo, P. (2006) 'The 'home advantage' effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USTPTO and EPO' Scientometrics 66(1): 23-41.
11. Dittrich, K., & G. Duijsters (2007) 'Networking as a means to strategic change: the case of open innovation in mobile telephony' Journal of Product Innovation Management 24(6): 510-521.
12. Dolfsma, W. (2008) Knowledge Economies. London & New York: Routledge.
13. Dolfsma, W. (2009) 'Kennis delen: micro en macro.' In: J.-P. van den Toren (ed.) Connecting Global Ambitions: de Nederlandse manier van samenwerken. Den Haag.
14. Dolfsma, W. (2011) 'Patent Strategizing' Journal of Intellectual Capital 12(2): 168-178
15. Dolfsma, W., Chr. Chaminade & J. Vang (eds.) (2008) Knowledge Dynamics out of Balance. Research Policy, special issue.
16. Dolfsma, W. & R. Verburg (2008) 'Structure, Agency and the Role of Values in Processes of Institutional Change' Journal of Economic Issues 42(4): 1031-54.
17. Dosi, G. (1982) 'Technological paradigms and technological trajectories' Research Policy 11: 147-62.
18. Edquist, C. (2004) 'Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges.' In: J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Engelsman, E. C. & A. F. J. van Raan (1994) 'A patent-based cartography of technology' Research Policy 23(1): 1-26.
20. Gambardella, A., D. Harhoff & B. Verspagen (2008) 'The value of European patents' European Management Review 5: 69-84.
21. Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
22. Grandstrand, O. (2000) The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
23. Griliches, Z. (1990) 'Patent statistics as Economic Indicators' Journal of Economic Literature 28(4): 1661-707.
24. Hall, B.H., A. Jaffe & M. Trajtenberg (2005) 'Market value and patent citations' RAND Journal of Economics 36(1): 16-38.
25. Innovatieplatform (2004) Voorstellen Sleutelgebieden-aanpak. Den Haag.
26. Innovatieplatform (2009) Voortgang Sleutelgebieden en tussentijdse evaluatie Sleutelgebieden-aanpak. Den Haag.
27. Islam, N. & K. Miyazaki (2009) 'Nanotechnology innovation System: Understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories' Technological Forecasting & Social Change 76, 128-40.
28. Kamada, T. & S. Kawai (1989) 'An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs' Information Processing Letters 31(1): 7-15.
29. Kleinknecht, A., K. van Montfort & E. Brouwer (2002) 'The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators' Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11: 109-121.
30. Lanjouw, JO. & M. Schankermann (2004) ' Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?' Journal of Law and Economics 47: 45-74.
31. Lemley, M.A. & C. Shapiro (2005) ' robabilistic Patents' Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(2): 75-98.
32. Lenocini, R. and S. Montresor, Network Analysis of Eight Technological Systems, Int. Rev. of Applied Econ. 14 (2) (2000) 213-34.
33. Lerner, J. (1995) 'Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors' Journal of Law and Economics 38.
34. Lerner, J. (2009) 'The Empirical Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Innovation: Puzzles and Clues' American Economic Review 99(2): 343-48.
35. Levin, R.C., A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson, & S.G. Winter (1987) 'Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3.
36. Leydesdorff, L. (2004) 'The University-Industry Knowledge Relationship: Analyzing Patents and the Science Base of Technologies' Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technololgy 55(11): 991-1001.
37. Leydesdorff, L. (2008a) 'Patent Classifications as Indicators of Intellectual Organization' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(10): 1582-97.
38. Leydesdorff, L. (2008b) 'The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: a most recent update' Scientometrics 76(1): 159-67.
39. Leydesdorff, L. & M. Fritsch (2006) 'Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics' Research Policy 35(10): 1538-53.
40. Leydesdorff, L., W. Dolfsma & G. van der Panne. (2006) 'Measuring the Knowledge Base of an Economy in terms of Triple-Helix Relations among 'Technology, Organization, and Territory" Research Policy 35(2): 181-99.
41. Leydesdorff, L. & T. Schank (2008) 'Dynamic Animations of Journal Maps: Indicators of Structural Changes and Interdisciplinary Developments' Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technologogy 59(11): 1810-18.
42. Leydesdorff, L. & I. Rafols (2011) 'Local Emergence and Global Diffusion of Research Technologies: An exploration of patterns of network formation' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(5)
43. Liu, X. & S. White (2001) 'Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context' Research Policy 30: 1091-114.
44. Lotti, F. & E. Santarelli (2001) 'Linking Knowledge to Productivity: a German-Italy Comparison Using the CIS database' Empirica 28: 293-317.
45. Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.) (1992) National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter Publishers.
46. Lundvall, B.-A. (1988) 'Innovation as an interactive process - from user-producer interaction to national systems of innovation.' In: G. Dosi, C.Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, L. Soete (Eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.
47. Malerba, F. & L. Orsenigo (1997) 'Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities' Industrial and Corporate Change 6: 83-117.
48. Ministry of Economic Affairs (2005) Onderscheidend vermogen - Sleutelgebieden-aanpak: samen werken aan innovatie op kansrijke gebieden. The Hague.
49. Nelson, A.J. (2009) 'Measuring knowledge spillovers: what patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion' Research Policy 38: 994-1005.
50. Nelson, R. R. (ed.) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Nooteboom, B. & E. Stam (eds.) (2008) Microfoundations for Innovation Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
52. De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A. and V. Batagelj (2006) Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1994) The measurement of scientific and technological activities: Using patent data as science and technology indicators (Vol. OCDE/GD(94)114). Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/62/2095942.pdf.
54. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1997) Patents and Innovation in the International Context. Paris: OECD 1997.
55. Rip, A. & R. Kemp (1998) 'Technological Change.' In Steve Rayner and Liz Malone (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol 2, Resources and Technology, Batelle Press, Washington D.C., 1998, 327-99.
56. Scheu, M., Veefkind, V., Verbandt, Y., Galan, E. M., Absalom, R., & Förster, W. (2006) 'Mapping nanotechnology patents: The EPO approach' World Patent Information 28: 204-11.
57. Storz, C. (2008) 'Dynamics in Innovation Systems: Evidence from Japan's game software industry' Research Policy 37: 1480-1491.
58. Verspagen, B. (1997) 'Measuring Intersectoral Technology Spillovers: Estimates from the European and US Patent Office Databases' Economic Systems Research 9(1): 47-64.
59. Verspagen, B. (2006) 'University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems' Journal of Economic Surveys 20(4): 607-32.
60. Wuchty, S., B. Jones & B. Uzzi. (2007) 'The Increasing Dominance of Teams in the Production of Knowledge,' Science, May 2007, 316:1036-9.