Late auditory evoked potentials in elderly long-term hearing-aid users with unilateral or bilateral fittings

Hearing Research

Volumn 280, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 58-69

  Bertoli, Sibylle ^a   Probst, Rudolf ^b   Bodmer, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY LATERALIZATION; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELDERLY CARE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 80053051882     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alain C., Snyder J.S. Age-related differences in auditory evoked responses during rapid perceptual learning. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119:356-366.
2. Amenedo E., Diaz F. Ageing-related changes in the processing of attended and unattended standard stimuli. Neuroreport 1999, 10:2383-2388.
3. Arlinger S., Gatehouse S., Bentler R.A., Byrne D., Cox R.M., Dirks D.D., Humes L., Neuman A., Ponton C., Robinson K., Silman S., Summerfield A.Q., Turner C.W., Tyler R.S., Willott J.F. Report of the Eriksholm Workshop on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996, 17:87S-98S.
4. Atienza M., Cantero J.L., Dominguez-Marin E. The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning. Learn. Mem. 2002, 9:138-150.
5. Balfour P.B., Hawkins D.B. A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli. Ear Hear 1992, 13:331-339.
6. Bertoli S., Smurzynski J., Probst R. Effects of age, age-related hearing loss, and contralateral cafeteria noise on the discrimination of small frequency changes: psychoacoustic and electrophysiological measures. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2005, 6:207-222.
7. Bertoli S., Staehelin K., Zemp E., Schindler C., Bodmer D., Probst R. Survey on hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. Int. J. Audiol. 2009, 48:183-195.
8. Bertoli S., Bodmer D., Probst R. Survey on hearing aid outcome in Switzerland: associations with type of fitting (bilateral/unilateral), level of hearing aid signal processing, and hearing loss. Int. J. Audiol. 2010, 49:333-346.
9. Bosnyak D.J., Eaton R.A., Roberts L.E. Distributed auditory cortical representations are modified when non-musicians are trained at pitch discrimination with 40 Hz amplitude modulated tones. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:1088-1099.
10. Byrne D., Noble W., LePage B. Effects of long-term bilateral and unilateral fitting of different hearing aid types on the ability to locate sounds. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 1992, 3:369-382.
11. Ceponiene R., Westerfield M., Torki M., Townsend J. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Res. 2008, 1215:53-68.
12. Ceponiene R., Cummings A., Wulfeck B., Ballantyne A., Townsend J. Spectral vs. temporal auditory processing in specific language impairment: a developmental ERP study. Brain Lang. 2009, 110:107-120.
13. Crowley K., Trinder J., Kim Y., Carrington M., Colrain I.M. The effects of normal aging on sleep spindle and K-complex production. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113:1615-1622.
14. Crowley K.E., Colrain I.M. A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:732-744.
15. Dreschler W.A., Boymans M. Clinical evaluation on the advantage of binaural hearing aid fittings. Audiologische Akustik 1994, 5:12-23.
16. Erdman S.A., Sedge R.K. Subjective comparisons of binaural versus monaural amplification. Ear Hear 1981, 2:225-229.
17. Frisina R.D., Rajan R. Inferior colliculus: aging and plasticity. The Inferior Colliculus 2005, Springer, New York. J. Winer, C. Schreiner (Eds.).
18. Gabriel D., Veuillet E., Vesson J.F., Collet L. Rehabilitation plasticity: influence of hearing aid fitting on frequency discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cut-off. Hear Res. 2006, 213:49-57.
19. Gatehouse S. Apparent auditory deprivation effects of late onset: the role of presentation level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 86:2103-2106.
20. Gatehouse S., Robinson K. Acclimatisation to monaural hearing aid fitting - effects on loudness functions and preliminary evidence for parallel electrophysiological and behavioural effects. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids 1996, 319-331. World Scientific, Singapore. B. Kollmeier (Ed.).
21. Gelfand S.A., Silman S., Ross L. Long-term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss. Scand. Audiol. 1987, 16:201-207.
22. Hahlbrock K.H. Über Sprachaudiometrie und neue Wörterteste. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd 1953, 162:394-431.
23. Hanss J., Veuillet E., Adjout K., Besle J., Collet L., Thai-Van H. The effect of long-term unilateral deafness on the activation pattern in the auditory cortices of French-native speakers: influence of deafness side. BMC Neurosci. 2009, 10:23.
24. Hine J., Debener S. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:1274-1285.
25. Hutchinson K.M., McGill D.J. The efficacy of utilizing the P300 as a measure of auditory deprivation in monaurally aided profoundly hearing-impaired children. Scand. Audiol. 1997, 26:177-185.
26. Hyde M. The N1 response and its applications. Audiol. Neurootol. 1997, 2:281-307.
27. Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1977, 61:1337-1351.
28. Kobler S., Rosenhall U. Horizontal localization and speech intelligibility with bilateral and unilateral hearing aid amplification. Int. J. Audiol. 2002, 41:395-400.
29. Kobler S., Rosenhall U., Hansson H. Bilateral hearing aids-effects and consequences from a user perspective. Scand. Audiol. 2001, 30:223-235.
30. Korczak P.A., Kurtzberg D., Stapells D.R. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing aids on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear. 2005, 26:165-185.
31. Leeuw A.R., Dreschler W.A. Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics. Audiology 1991, 30:330-344.
32. McDermott H.J., Lech M., Kornblum M.S., Irvine D.R. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 104:2314-2325.
33. Moore B.C.J., Johnson J.S., Clark T.M., Pluvinage V. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear. 1992, 13:349-370.
34. Munro K.J., Lutman M.E. The effect of speech presentation level on measurement of auditory acclimatization to amplified speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 114:484-495.
35. Munro K.J., Pisareva N.Y., Parker D.J., Purdy S.C. Asymmetry in the auditory brainstem response following experience of monaural amplification. Neuroreport 2007, 18:1871-1874.
36. Munro K.J., Walker A.J., Purdy S.C. Evidence for adaptive plasticity in elderly monaural hearing aid users. Neuroreport 2007, 18:1237-1240.
37. Munro K.J. Reorganization of the adult auditory system: perceptual and physiological evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif. 2008, 12:254-271.
38. Nabelek A.K., Mason D. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms. J. Speech Hear. Res. 1981, 24:375-383.
39. Neuman A.C. Late-onset auditory deprivation: a review of past research and an assessment of future research needs. Ear Hear. 1996, 17:3S-13S.
40. Noble W., Gatehouse S. Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int. J. Audiol. 2006, 45:172-181.
41. Oates P.A., Kurtzberg D., Stapells D.R. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear. 2002, 23:399-415.
42. Philibert B., Collet L., Vesson J.F., Veuillet E. The auditory acclimatization effect in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for functional plasticity. Hear Res. 2005, 205:131-142.
43. Polen S. Auditory event related potentials. Semin. Hear. 1984, 5:127-141.
44. Punch J.L., Jenison R.L., Allan J., Durrant J.D. Evaluation of three strategies for fitting hearing aids binaurally. Ear Hear 1991, 12:205-215.
45. Reinke K.S., He Y., Wang C., Alain C. Perceptual learning modulates sensory evoked response during vowel segregation. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003, 17:781-791.
46. Robinson K., Gatehouse S. Changes in intensity discrimination following monaural long-term use of a hearing aid. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 97:1183-1190.
47. Robinson K., Gatehouse S. The time course of effects on intensity discrimination following monaural fitting of hearing aids. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 99:1255-1258.
48. Ross B., Tremblay K. Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners. Hear Res. 2009, 248:48-59.
49. Sheehan K.A., McArthur G.M., Bishop D.V.M. Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds?. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 25:547-553.
50. Silman S., Gelfand S.A., Silverman C.A. Late-onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984, 76:1357-1362.
51. Stephens S.D., Callaghan D.E., Hogan S., Meredith R., Rayment A., Davis A. Acceptability of binaural hearing aids: a cross-over study. J. R. Soc. Med. 1991, 84:267-269.
52. Thai-Van H., Micheyl C., Norena A., Collet L. Local improvement in auditory frequency discrimination is associated with hearing-loss slope in subjects with cochlear damage. Brain 2002, 125:524-537.
53. Thai-Van H., Micheyl C., Norena A., Veuillet E., Gabriel D., Collet L. Enhanced frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired individuals: a review of perceptual correlates of central neural plasticity induced by cochlear damage. Hear Res. 2007, 233:14-22.
54. Thai-Van H., Philibert B., Veuillet E., Collet L. Assessment of auditory plasticity using psychoacoustic and electrophysiological measurements. Audiological Med. 2009, 7:55-66.
55. Thalmann B., Monsch A.U., Schneitter M., Bernasconi F., Aebi C., Camachova-Davet Z., Staehelin H.B. The cerad neuropsychological assessment battery (Cerad-NAB) - a minimal data set as a common tool for German-speaking Europe. Neurobiol. Aging 2000, 21:30.
56. Tong Y., Melara R.D., Rao A. P2 enhancement from auditory discrimination training is associated with improved reaction times. Brain Res. 2009, 1297:80-88.
57. Tremblay K., Kraus N., McGee T., Ponton C., Otis B. Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear 2001, 22:79-90.
58. Tremblay K.L., Kraus N. Auditory training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2002, 45:564-572.
59. Tremblay K.L., Piskosz M., Souza P. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114:1332-1343.
60. Tremblay K.L., Shahin A.J., Picton T., Ross B. Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specific cues in humans. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009, 120:128-135.
61. Tremblay K.L., Inoue K., McClannahan K., Ross B. Repeated stimulus exposure alters the way sound is encoded in the human brain. PLoS One 2010, 5:e10283.
62. Tschopp K., Züst H. Performance of normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners using a german version of the SPIN-Test. Scand. Audiol. 1994, 23:241-247.
63. Welsh K.A., Butters N., Mohs R.C., Beekly D., Edland S., Fillenbaum G., Heyman A. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery. Neurology 1994, 44:609-614.