Individual patterns of prey selection and dietary specialization in an Arctic marine carnivore

Oikos

Volumn 120, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1469-1478

  Thiemann, Gregory W ^a,b   Iverson, Sara J ^a   Stirling, Ian ^c,d   Obbard, Martyn E ^e  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^e TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE CLASS; ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT; BEAR; CLIMATE CHANGE; DIET; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FATTY ACID; FOOD INTAKE; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; PINNIPED; PREY SELECTION; SEA ICE; SPECIALIZATION; SUBPOPULATION;

CANADA; HUDSON BAY;

ANIMALIA; ERIGNATHUS; ERIGNATHUS BARBATUS; PHOCA HISPIDA; URSUS MARITIMUS;

EID: 80053051166     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19277.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Amstrup S. C. et al. 2000. Movements and distribution of polar bears in the Beaufort Sea. Can. J. Zool. 78: 948-966.
2. Angerbjörn A. et al. 1994. Dietary variation in arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus): an analysis of stable carbon isotopes. Oecologia 99: 226-232.
3. Beck C. A. et al. 2007. Sex differences in grey seal diet reflect seasonal variation in foraging behaviour and reproductive expenditure: evidence from quantitative fatty acid signature analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 76: 490-502.
4. Birks J. D. S. and Dunstone N. 1985. Sex-related differences in the diet of the mink Mustela vison. Holarct. Ecol. 8: 245-252.
5. Bolnick D. I. et al. 2002. Measuring individual-level resource specialization. Ecology 83: 2936-2941.
6. Bolnick D. I. et al. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161: 1-28.
7. Budge S. M. et al. 2006. Studying trophic ecology in marine ecosystems using fatty acids: a primer on analysis and interpretation. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 22: 759-801.
8. Calvert W. and Ramsay M. A. 1998. Evaluation of age determination of polar bears by counts of cementum growth layer groups. Ursus 10: 449-453.
9. Clarke J. et al. 1998. Sex differences in Adélie penguin foraging strategies. Polar Biol. 20: 248-258.
10. Clutton-Brock T. H. et al. 1987. Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female red deer (Cervus elaphus). J. Zool. 211: 275-289.
11. Derocher A. E. et al. 2002. Diet composition of polar bears in Svalbard and the western Barents Sea. Polar Biol. 25: 448-452.
12. Estes J. A. et al. 2003. Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 144-155.
13. Feinsinger P. et al. 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62: 27-32.
14. Ferguson S. H. et al. 2005. Climate change and ringed seal (Phoca hispida) recruitment in western Hudson Bay. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 21: 121-135.
15. Folch J. et al. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226: 497-509.
16. Holbrook S. J. and Schmitt R. J. 1992. Causes and consequences of dietary specialization in surfperches: patch choice and intraspecific competition. Ecology 73: 402-412.
17. Houston D. and Shine R. 1993. Sexual dimorphism and niche divergence: feeding habits of the Arafura filesnake. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 737-748.
18. Iverson S. J. 2009. Tracing aquatic food webs using fatty acids: from qualitative indicators to quantitative determination. - In: Arts M. et al. (eds.), Lipids in aquatic ecosystems. Springer, pp. 281-307.
19. Iverson S. J. et al. 2001. Comparison of the Bligh and Dyer and Folch methods for total lipid determination in a broad range of marine tissue. Lipids 36: 1283-1287.
20. Iverson S. J. et al. 2004. Quantitative fatty acid signature analysis: a new method of estimating predator diets. Ecol. Monogr. 74: 211-235.
21. Iverson S. J. et al. 2006. Spatial and temporal variation in the diets of polar bears across the Canadian Arctic: indicators of changes in prey populations and environment. - In: Boyd I. L. et al. (eds), Top predators in marine ecosystems. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 98-117.
22. Iverson S. J. et al. 2007. Seabirds as indicators of food web structure and ecosystem variability: qualitative and quantitative diet analyses using fatty acids. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 352: 235-244.
23. Kie J. G. and Bowyer R. T. 1999. Sexual segregation in white-tailed deer: density-dependent changes in use of space, habitat selection and dietary niche. J. Mammal. 80: 1004-1020.
24. Kingsley M. C. S. 1979. Fitting the von Bertalanffy growth equation to polar bear age-weight data. Can. J. Zool. 57: 1020-1025.
25. Krebs C. J. 1994. Ecology. - Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
26. Laidre K. L. et al. 2008. Quantifying the sensitivity of arctic marine mammals to climate-induced habitat change. Ecol. Appl. 18: S97-S125.
27. Lunn N. J. et al. 1997. Distribution and abundance of ringed (Phoca hispida) and bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus) in western Hudson Bay. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 914-921.
28. MacArthur R. H. and Pianka E. R. 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Nat. 100: 603-609.
29. Markham W. E. 1986. The ice cover. - In: Martini I. P. (ed.), Canadian inland seas. Elsevier, pp. 101-116.
30. Mauritzen M. et al. 2001. Space-use strategies of female polar bears in a dynamic sea ice habitat. Can. J. Zool. 79: 1704-1713.
31. McEachern M. et al. 2006. Evidence for local specialization in a generalist mammalian herbivore, Neotoma fuscipes. Oikos 113: 440-448.
32. Molnár P. K. et al. 2010. Predicting survival, reproduction and abundance of polar bears under climate change. Biol. Conserv. 143: 1612-1622.
33. Obbard M. E. et al. 2006. Temporal trends in the body condition of southern Hudson Bay polar bears. Climate Change Res. Inf. Note 3: 1-8.
34. Partridge L. 1976. Individual differences in feeding efficiencies and feeding preferences of captive great tits. Anim. Behav. 24: 230-240.
35. Pond C. M. et al. 1992. The anatomy, chemical composition, and metabolism of adipose tissue in wild polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Can. J. Zool. 70: 326-341.
36. Post E. et al. 2009. Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change. Science 325: 1355-1358.
37. Ramsay M. A. and Stirling I. 1986. On the mating system of polar bears. Can. J. Zool. 64: 2142-2151.
38. Regehr E. V. et al. 2007. Effects of earlier sea ice breakup on survival and population size of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. J. Wildlife Manage. 71: 2673-2683.
39. Sargeant B. L. 2007. Individual foraging specialization: niche width versus niche overlap. Oikos 116: 1431-1437.
40. Schindler D. E. et al. 1997. Density-dependent changes in individual foraging specialization of largemouth bass. Oecologia 110: 592-600.
41. Smith T. G. 1981. Notes on the bearded seal, Erignathus barbatus, in the Canadian Arctic. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1042.
42. Smith T. G. and Stirling I. 1975. The breeding habitat of the ringed seal (Phoca hispida). The birth lair and associated structures. Can. J. Zool. 53: 1297-1305.
43. Stephens D. W. and Krebs J. R. 1986. Foraging theory. - Princeton Univ. Press.
44. Stirling I. 1974. Midsummer observations on the behaviour of wild polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Can. J. Zool. 52: 1191-1198.
45. Stirling I. 1980. The biological importance of polynyas in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 33: 303-315.
46. Stirling I. 2002. Polar bears and seals in the eastern Beaufort Sea and Amundsen Gulf: a synthesis of population trends and ecological relationships over three decades. Arctic 55, Suppl. 1: 59-76.
47. Stirling I. 2005. Reproductive rates of ringed seals and survival of pups in northwestern Hudson Bay, Canada, 1991-2000. Polar Biol. 28: 381-387.
48. Stirling I. and McEwan E. H. 1975. The caloric value of whole ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in relation to polar bear (Ursus maritimus) ecology and hunting behavior. Can. J. Zool. 53: 1021-1027.
49. Stirling I. and Derocher A. E. 1990. Factors affecting the evolution and behavioral ecology of the modern bears. Int. Conf. Bear Res. Manage. 8: 189-204.
50. Stirling I. and Øritsland N. A. 1995. Relationships between estimates of ringed seal (Phoca hispida) and polar bear (Ursus maritimus) populations in the Canadian Arctic. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 2594-2612.
51. Stirling I. and Parkinson C. L. 2006. Possible effects of climate warming on selected populations of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 59: 261-275.
52. Stirling I. et al. 1982. The distribution and abundance of seals in the eastern Beaufort Sea, 1974-79. Can. Wildlife Serv. Occas. Pap. No. 47.
53. Stirling I. et al. 1989. Immobilization of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) with Telazol in the Canadian Arctic. J. Wildlife Dis. 25: 159-168.
54. Stirling I. et al. 1993. Habitat preferences of polar bears in the western Canadian Arctic in late winter and spring. Polar Rec. 29: 13-24.
55. Stirling I. et al. 1999. Long-term trends in the population ecology of polar bears in western Hudson Bay in relation to climatic change. Arctic 52: 294-306.
56. Svanbäck R. and Bolnick D. I. 2005. Intraspecific competition affects the strength of individual specialization: an optimal diet theory method. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7: 993-1012.
57. Thiemann G. W. 2006. Continental scale variation in polar bear (Ursus maritimus) diets and the fatty acid signatures of their marine mammal prey. - PhD thesis, Dalhousie Univ.
58. Thiemann G. W. et al. 2006. Seasonal, sexual and anatomical variability in the adipose tissue of polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J. Zool. Lond. 269: 65-76.
59. Thiemann G. W. et al. 2007. Unusual fatty acid biomarkers reveal age- and sex-specific foraging in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Can. J. Zool. 85: 505-517.
60. Thiemann G. W. et al. 2008a. Polar bear diets and arctic marine food webs: insights from fatty acid analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 78: 591-613.
61. Thiemann G. W. et al. 2008b. Variation in blubber fatty acid composition among marine mammals in the Canadian Arctic. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 24: 91-111.
62. Tinker M. et al. 2008. Food limitation leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in sea otters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 560-565.
63. Wielgus R. B. and Bunnell F. L. 1995. Tests of hypotheses for sexual segregation in grizzly bears. J. Wildlife Manage. 59: 552-560.
64. Woo K. et al. 2008. Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 1082-1091.
65. Zar J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. - Prentice-Hall.