Towards a typology of meaningful signals and cues in social robotics

Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 72-78

  Hegel, Frank ^a   Gieselmann, Sebastian ^a   Peters, Annika ^a   Holthaus, Patrick ^a   Wrede, Britta ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL ROBOTICS; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; MACHINE DESIGN; USER INTERFACES;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 80053009720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005246     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. H. Jestram (2000). 'Mythen, Monster und Maschinen, Der künstliche Mensch im Film'. Teiresias-Press, Cologne, Germany.
2. C.S.Peirce (1931). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. (Ed. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A.W. Burks). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, USA.
3. J. Maynard Smith and D. Harper (2003). Animal Signals. Oxford University Press.USA.
4. C. Breazeal (2002). Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, USA.
5. F. Hegel, C. Muhl, B. Wrede, M. Hielscher-Fastabend, and G. Sagerer (2009). Understanding Social Robots. In the Proceedings of the Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI), Cancun, Mexico.
6. L.A. Zebrowitz (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul? Boulder, CO: Westview Press, USA.
7. M. Blow, K. Dautenhahn, K. Appleby, C.L. Nehaniv,and D. Lee (2006). Perception of robot smiles and dimensions for humanrobot interaction design. In the Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Hatfield, UK, S.469-474.
8. C.F. DiSalvo, F. Gemperle, J. Forlizzi, and S. Kiesler (2002). All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In DIS '02: Proceedings of the Conference on Designing interactive systems, pp. 321-326, New York, NY, USA.
9. F. Eyssel, F. Hegel, G. Horstmann, and C. Wagner (2010). Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study. In: 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). Viareggio, Italy.
10. F. Eyssel and F. Hegel (accepted). (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of social robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
11. K. Dion, E. Berscheid, and E. Walster (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 24 (3), pp. 285-290.
12. J.H. Langlois, L.A. Roggman, and L.A. Ricser-Danner (1990). Infants Differential Social Responses to Attractive and Unattractive Faces. Developmental Psychology, 26, pp. 153-159.
13. D.A. Norman (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books, USA.
14. N. Tractinsky, A.S. Katz, and D. Ikar (2000). Interacting with computers 13(2): pp. 127-145.
15. A.F. Monk and K. Lelos (2007). Changing only the aesthetic features of a domestic product can affect its apparent usability. In A. Venkatesh et al. (ed.s) Home informatics and telematics: ICT for the next billion. Proceedings of HOIT 2007, Chennai, India. New York: Springer, pp. 221-234.
16. N. Epley, A. Waytz, and J.T. Cacioppo (2007). On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114, pp. 864-886.
17. S. Krach, F. Hegel, B. Wrede, G. Sagerer, F. Binkofski, and T. Kircher (2008). Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. In PLoS ONE, 3(7), July 2008. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0002597.
18. A. Peters, T. Spexard, P. Weiß, and M. Hanheide (in press). Hey robot, get out of my way. In B. Gottfried and H. K. Aghajan (editors), Behavior Monitoring and Interpretation. Well-Being.
19. See the German Magazine Spiegel online: http://www.spiegel.de/auto/ aktuell/0,1518,444498,00.html
20. M. Mori (1997). The Buddha in the Robot. Charles E. Tuttle Co.
21. J. Seyama and R.S. Nagayama (2007). The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16(4), pp. 337-351.
22. M.S. Dawkins and T. Guilford (1991). The corruption of honest signalling. Anim. Behav 41, pp. 865-873.
23. M. Lohse (in press). The role of expectations and situations in human-robot interaction. New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction: John Benjamins Publising Company.
24. P. Watzlawick, J.H. Beavin, and D.D. Jackson (1968). Pragmatics of human communication: a study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes", Faber, London, UK.
25. L.D. Riek, T. Rabinowitch, B. Chakrabarti, and P. Robinson (2009). How Anthropomorphism Affects Empathy Toward Robots. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 09), San Diego, CA, USA.
26. S.E. Guthrie (1997). Anthropomorphism: A Definition and a Theory. In: R. W. Mitchell et al., 'Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals'. Albany: State University of New York Press., USA.
27. M. Lohse, F. Hegel, A. Swadzba, K. Rohlfing, S. Wachsmuth, and B. Wrede (2007). What can I do for you? Appearance and Application of Robots. Annual Convention of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (AISB'07). Newcastle upon Tyne, GB.
28. K. Klemp and K. Ueki-Polet (2010). Less and More: The Design Ethos of Dieter Rams. Die Gestalten Verlag, Berlin, Germany.