Innovations: Perceptions of teachers and school leaders on bottlenecks and outcomes

Education as Change

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 149-160

  Hofman, Roelande H ^a   Jansen, Edine ^a   Spijkerboer, Alma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Innovations; Outcomes; Reform; School leaders; Teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052994748     PISSN: 16823206     EISSN: 19479417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16823206.2011.573799     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boyle, B., I. Lamprianou and T. Boyle. 2005. A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 16:1-27.
2. De Boom, J., R.H. Hofman, W.H.A. Hofman and M. Meeuwisse. 2007. Educational innovation, quality and effects: An exploration of innovations and their effects in secondary education. Submitted to Educational Policy.
3. Dutch Parliament. 2008. Parlementair Onderzoek Onderwijsvernieuwingen. (Nr. 6). Den Haag: SDU.
4. Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. 2003. Milestones en route to evidence-based policies. Research Papers in Education 18:313-329.
5. Fullan, M. 2007. The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Hanushek, E.A. 2005. Why quality matters in education. Finance and Development 42(2).
7. Hattie, J. 2003. Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper delivered at the ACER Conference 'Building teacher quality'.
8. Hattie, J. 2009. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London and New York: Routledge.
9. Hofman, R.H. and B.J. Dijkstra. 2010. Effective teacher professionalization in networks? Teaching and Teacher Education 26:1031-1040.
10. Inspectie van het Onderwijs. 2000. Onderwijsverslag over het jaar 1999. Utrecht: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
11. Lieberman, A. 2005. Networks as learning communities. Journal of Teacher Education 51:221.
12. Lieberman, A. and D.R. Wood. 2002. From network learning to classroom teaching. Journal of Educational Change 3:315-337.
13. Leithwood, K., R. Aitken and D. Jantzi. 2001. Making schools smarter: A system for monitoring school and district progress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14. Lomos, C., R.H. Hofman and R.J. Bosker. 2010. Professional community and student achievement-a meta-analysis. Accepted for School Effectiveness and School Improvement.
15. Pater, C. 2008. Literatuurstudie naar succes-en faalfactoren bij duurzaam innoveren in het primair en voortgezet onderwijs. Groningen: GION/RUG.
16. Schacter, J. and Y.M. Yum. 2005. TAPping into high-quality teachers: Preliminary results from the Teacher Advancement Program comprehensive school reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 16:327-353.
17. Sleegers, P. and G. Ledoux. 2006. Innovatie in het primair onderwijs: Strategieën, ervaringen en aan-bevelingen: Een literatuurstudie naar werkzame principes. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut.
18. TALIS/OECD. 2009. Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD.
19. Timperley, H. and A. Alton-Lee. 2007. Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education 32:328-369.
20. Van der Bolt, L., F. Studulski, A.L. van der Vegt and D. Bontje. 2006. De betrokkenheid van de leraar bij onderwijsinnovaties. Beleidsonderzoek Arbeidsmarkt en Personeelsbeleid Onderwijs: brochure no 140 van het Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. Den Haag: OCW.
21. Waslander, S. 2007. Leren over innoveren. Utrecht: VO-project Innovatie.
22. Willms, J.D. and M.A. Somers. 2001. Family, classroom, and school effects on children's educational outcomes in Latin America. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 12:409-445.