Object-aware business processes: Fundamental requirements and their support in existing approaches

International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 19-46

  Künzle, Vera ^a   Weber, Barbara ^b   Reichert, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Data Driven Process Execution; Object Aware; Process Management; Process Aware Information Systems; Straight Jacketed

Indexed keywords

DATA-DRIVEN PROCESS EXECUTIONS; OBJECT-AWARE; PROCESS MANAGEMENT; PROCESS-AWARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS; STRAIGHT-JACKETED;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 80052988510     PISSN: 19478186     EISSN: 19478194     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jismd.2011040102     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Bider, I. (2002). State-oriented business process modeling: Principles, theory and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
2. Botha, R. A. (2002). CoSAWoE - a model for contextsensitive access control in workflow environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg, South Africa.
3. Dadam, P., & Reichert, M. (2009). The ADEPT project: A Decade of research and development for robust and flexible process support - challenges and achievements. Computer Science - Research & Development, 23(2), 81-97.
4. Dori, D. (2002). Object-process methodology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
5. Gerede, C. E., & Su, J. (2007). Specification and verification of artifact behaviors in business process models. In B. Krämer, K.-J. Lin, & P. Narasimhan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (LNCS 4749, pp. 181-192).
6. Künzle, V., & Reichert, M. (2009a). Towards object-aware process management systems: Issues, challenges, benefits. Paper presented at the 10th International Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
7. Künzle, V., & Reichert, M. (2009b). Integrating users in object-aware process management systems: Issues and challenges. In S. Rinderle-Ma, S. Sadiq, & F. Leymann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Business Process Design (LNBIP. 43, pp. 29-41).
8. Küster, J., Ryndina, K., & Gall, H. (2007). Generation of business process models for object life cycle compliance. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam, & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Business Process Management (LNCS 4714, pp. 165-181).
9. Liu, R., Bhattacharya, K., & Wu, F. Y. (2007). Modeling business contexture and behavior using business artifacts. In J. Krogstie, A. Opdahl, & G. Sindre (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (LNCS 4495, pp. 324-339).
10. Müller, D., Reichert, M., & Herbst, J. (2007). Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. In R. Meersman & Z. Tari (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (LNCS 4803, pp. 131-149).
11. Mutschler, B., Weber, B., & Reichert, M. (2008). Workflow management versus case handling: Results from a controlled software experiment. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Special Track on Coordination Models, Languages and Architectures (pp. 82-89).
12. Nigam, A., & Caswell, N. S. (2003). Business artifacts - an approach to operational specification. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 428-445. doi:10.1147/sj.423.0428
13. Nurcan, S. (2008). A survey on the flexibility requirements related to business processes and modeling artifacts. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (p. 378).
14. Pallas Athena. (2002). The Pallas Athena BV: Flower user manual. Apeldoorn, The Netherlands: BuscadorWord. Retrieved from http://word. bienesyautos. com/word-YAWL-Editor-15/2.php
15. Pesic, M. (2008). Constraint-based workflow management systems: Shifting control to users. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
16. Redding, G., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., & Iordachescu, A. (2008). Transforming object-oriented models to process-oriented models. In A. Ter Hofstede, B. Benatallah, & H.-Y. Paik (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Business Process Management (LNCS 4928, pp. 132-143).
17. Reijers, H. A., Liman, S., & Van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2003). Product-based workflow design. Management Information Systems, 20(1), 229-262.
18. Rinderle-Ma, S., & Reichert, M. (2007). A formal framework for adaptive access control models. In S. Spaccapietra, P. Atzeni, F. Fages, M.-S. Hacid, M. Kifer, J. Mylopoulos et al. (Eds.), Journal on Data Semantics 9 (LNCS 4601, pp. 82-112).
19. Rosemann, M., & zur Mühlen, M. (1998). Modellierung der aufbauorganisation in workflow-management-systemen: Kritische bestandsaufnahme und gestaltungsvorschläge. EMISA-Forum, 3(1), 78-86.
20. Rosemann, M., & zur Mühlen, M. (2004). Organizational management in workflow applications: Issues and perspectives. Information Technology Management, 5(3-4), 271-291.
21. Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M. E., Sadiq, W., & Schulz, K. (2005). When workflows will not deliver: The case of contradicting work practice. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Business Information Systems (pp. 69-84).
22. Sadiq, S., Sadiq, W., & Orlowska, M. (2005). A framework for constraint specification and validation in flexible workflows. Information Systems, 30(5), 349-378. doi:10.1016/j.is.2004.05.002
23. Silver, B. (2009). Case management: Addressing unique BPM requirements. Aptos, CA: BPMS Watch. Retrieved from http://www.global360.com/xres/uploads/ resource-center-documents/Case-Management-WP-final.pdf
24. Soffer, P., & Wand, Y. (2005). On the notion of soft-goals in business process modeling. Business Process Management Journal, 11(6), 663-679. doi:10.1108/14637150510630837
25. Van der Aalst, W. M. P., Barthelmess, P., Ellis, C. A., & Wainer, J. (2000). Workflow modeling using proclets. In O. Etzion & P. Scheuermann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (LNCS 1901, pp. 198-209).
26. Van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Pesic, M. (2006). Dec-SerFlow: Towards a truly declarative service flow language. In F. Leymann et al (Eds.), Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings: The Role of Business Processes in Service Oriented Architectures (LNCS 4184, pp. 1-23).
27. Van der Aalst, W. M. P., ter Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B., & Barros, A. (2003). Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1), 5-51. doi:10.1023/A:1022883727209
28. Van der Aalst, W. M. P., ter Hofstede, A., & Weske, M. (2003). Business process management: A survey. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 1-12).
29. Van der Aalst, W. M. P., Weske, M., & Grünbauer, D. (2005). Case handling: A new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 53(2), 129-162. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2004.07.003
30. Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H. A., & Van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2008). Product-based workflow support: Dynamic workflow execution. In Z. Bellahsene & M. Leonard (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (LNCS 5074, pp. 571-574).
31. Weber, B., Reichert, M., & Rinderle-Ma, S. (2008). Change patterns and change support features - enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 66(3), 438-466. doi:10.1016/j.datak. 2008.05.001
32. Wu, S., Sheth, A., Miller, J., & Luo, Z. (2002). Authorization and access control of application data in workflow-systems. Journal of the Association of Intelligent Information Systems, 18(1), 71-94. doi:10.1023/A:1012972608697