Effects of static magnetic fields on cognition, vital signs, and sensory perception: A meta-analysis

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 758-763

  Heinrich, Angela ^a   Szostek, Anne ^a   Nees, Frauke ^a   Meyer, Patric ^a   Semmler, Wolfhard ^b   Flor, Herta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

high static magnetic fields; magnetic resonance imaging; meta analysis; MRI safety; neurocognitive function

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIZZINESS; EYE HAND COORDINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; SENSORY SYSTEM; VALIDITY; VERTIGO; VISION; VITAL SIGN; WORKING MEMORY;

COGNITION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSATION; VITAL SIGNS;

EID: 80052986690     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22720     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Schenck JF,. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 2-19. (Pubitemid 30437260)
2. de Vocht F, Stevens T, van-Wendel-de-Joode B, Engels H, Kromhout H,. Acute neurobehavioral effects of exposure to static magnetic fields: analyses of exposure-response relations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 291-297. (Pubitemid 43364054)
3. de Vocht F, van Drooge H, Engels H, Kromhout H,. Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 197-204. (Pubitemid 43191074)
4. de Vocht F, Stevens T, Glover P, Gowland P, Kromhout H,. Cognitive effects of head-movements in stray fields generated by a 7 Tesla whole-body MRI magnet. Bioelectromagnetics 2007; 28: 247-255. (Pubitemid 46786866)
5. Chakeres DW, Bornstein R, Kangarlu A,. Randomized comparison of cognitive function in humans at 0 and 8 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 1: 342-345. (Pubitemid 37046516)
6. Schenck JF, Dumoulin CL, Redington RW, Kressel HY, Elliot RT, McDougall IL,. Human exposure to 4.0 Tesla magnetic fields in a whole body scanner. Med Phys 1992; 19: 1089-1098.
7. Chakeres DW, Kangarlu A, Boudoulas H, Young DC,. Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18: 346-352. (Pubitemid 37046517)
8. World Health Organization. Environmental Health Criteria 232. Static fields. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
9. de Vocht F, van-Wendel-de-Joode B, Engels H, Kromhout H,. Neurobehavioral effects among subjects exposed to high static and gradient magnetic fields from a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system-a case-crossover pilot study. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 670-674. (Pubitemid 37187829)
10. Cohen J,. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
11. Kline RB,. Beyond significance testing: reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research, 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004.
12. Glass G, McGaw B, Smith ML,. Meta-analysis in social research, 1st ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1981.