Randomized comparison of cognitive function in humans at 0 and 8 Tesla

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 342-345

  Chakeres, Donald W ^a   Bornstein, Robert ^a   Kangarlu, Allahyar ^a  

^a THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive function; Functional MRI; High field MRI; MRI safety; Neuropsychology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECOGNITION; SAFETY; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; BRAIN; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SAFETY;

EID: 0042829316     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10366     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Chakeres DW, Abduljalil AM, Novak P, Novak V. Comparison of 1.5 and 8 Tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of lacunar infarcts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:628-632.
2. Christoforidis GA, Grecula JC, Newton HB, et al. Visualization of microvascularity within glioblastoma multiforme utilizing 8 Tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1553-1556.
3. Christoforidis GA, Bourekas EC, Baujan M, et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the deep brain vascular anatomy at 8 Tesla: susceptibility based enhancement of the venous structures. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:857-866.
4. Kangarlu A, Burgess RE, Zhu H, et al. Cognitive, cardiac and physiological safety studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1407-1416.
5. Kangarlu A, Shellock FG. Aneurysm clips: evaluation of magnetic field interactions with a 8.0 Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:107-111.
6. McJury M, Shellock FG. Acoustic noise and MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:37-45.
7. Schenck JF. Health effects and safety of static magnetic fields. In: Shellock FG, editor. Magnetic Resonance Procedures: Health Effects and Safety. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. p. 1-30.
8. High WB, Sikora J, Ugurbil K, Garwood M. Subchronic in vivo effects of a high static magnetic field (9.4 T) in rats. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:122-139.
9. Shellock FG. Reference manual for magnetic resonance safety: 2003 edition. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys, Inc.; 92-97.
10. Nakahara T, Yaguchi H, Yoshida M, Miyakoshi J. Effects of exposure of CHO-K1 cells to a 10-T static magnetic field. Radiology 2002;224:817-822.
11. Duong TQ, Yacoub E, Adriany G, et al. High-resolution, spin-echo BOLD, and CBF fMRI at 4 and 7 T. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:589-593.
12. Besson J, Foreman EI, Eastwood LM, et al. Cognitive evaluation following NMR imaging of the brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984;47:314-316.
13. Bartels MV, Mann K, Matejcek M, et al. MRI and safety: EEG and neuro-psychological findings before and after MR. Forschr Rontgenstr 1986;145:383-385. (Ger)
14. Chakeres DW, Kangarlu A, Boudoulas H, et al. Effect of up to 8 Tesla static magnetic field exposure on sequential human vital signs measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging (in press).
15. Kangarlu A, Shellock FG, Chakeres DW. 8.0-Tesla human MR system: temperature changes associated with radio frequency-induced heating of a head phantom. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:220-226.