The comparison of multi-objective particle swarm optimization and NSGA II algorithm: Applications in centrifugal pumps

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1095-1113

  Nourbakhsh, Ahmad ^a   Safikhani, Hamed ^a   Derakhshan, Shahram ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

centrifugal pumps; computational fluid dynamics; multi objective optimization; NPSHr; particle swarm optimization

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID; GEOMETRICAL DESIGNS; GROUP METHOD OF DATA HANDLING; META MODEL; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTI OBJECTIVE PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; NET POSITIVE SUCTION HEADS; NPSHR; NSGA-II; NSGA-II ALGORITHM; OPTIMAL DESIGN; PARTICLE SWARM; POLYNOMIAL NEURAL NETWORKS;

ALGORITHMS; CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DATA HANDLING; NEURAL NETWORKS; PARETO PRINCIPLE; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO); PUMPS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 80052981145     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2010.542811     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ali-Tavoli, M., Nariman-Zadeh, N., Khalkhali, A. and Mehran, M., 2006. Multi-objective optimization of abrasive flow machining processes using polynomial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Machining Science and Technology, 10 (1), 491-510. (Pubitemid 44837693)
2. Amanifard, N., Nariman-Zadeh, N., Borji, M., Khalkhali, A. and Habibdoust, A., 2008. Modeling and Pareto optimization of heat transfer and flow coefficients in micro channels using GMDH type neural networks and genetic algorithms. Energy Conversion and Management, 49, 311-325. (Pubitemid 350137547)
3. Angeline, P.J., 1998. Using selection to improve particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation, May, Anchorage, AK. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center, 84-89.
4. Annamdas, K.K. and Rao S.S., 2009. Multi-objective optimization of engineering systems using game theory and particle swarm optimization. Engineering Optimization, 41 (8), 737-752.
5. Astrom, K.J. and Eykhoff, P., 1971. System identification, a survey. Automatica, 7 (2), 123-62.
6. Auto Blade user guide, 2009. Numeca International, Brussels, Belgium.
7. Bachus, L. and Custodio, A., 2003. Know and understand centrifugal pumps. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
8. Demeulenaere, A., Purwanto, A., Ligout, A., Hirsch, C., Dijkers, R. and Visser, F., 2005. Design and optimization of an industrial pump: Application of genetic algorithm and neural network. Proceedings of ASME fluid engineering summer conference, June, Houston, Texas. NewYork: ASME, 1519-1527. (Pubitemid 41770537)
9. Eberhart, R.C., Dobbins, R. and Simpson, P.K., 1996. Computational intelligence PC tools. Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
10. Eberhart, R.C. and Shi,Y., 1998. Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation.May, Anchorage,AK. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1447, Berlin: Springer, 611-616.
11. Engelbrecht, A.P. (ed.), 2002. Computational intelligence: An introduction. Chichester, UK: JohnWiley & Sons.
12. Farlow, S.J., 1984. Self-organizing method in modeling: GMDH type algorithm. NewYork: Marcel Dekker Inc.
13. Fieldsend, J.E. and Singh, S., 2002. A multi-objective algorithm based upon particle swarm optimization and efficient data structure and turbulence. Workshop on computational intelligence, 2-4 September, Birmingham, UK, 37-44.
14. Hu X., and Eberhart R. C., 2002. Multi-objective optimization using dynamic neighborhood particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, 12-17 May, Honolulu, HI, USA. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center, 1677-1681.
15. Ivakhnenko, A.G., 1971. Polynomial theory of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, SMC-1, 364-378.
16. Izui, K., Nishiwaki, S., Yoshimura, M., Nakamura, M. and Renaud, J.E., 2008. Enhanced multi-objective particle swarm optimization in combination with adaptive weighted gradient-based searching. Engineering Optimization, 40 (9), 789-804.
17. Jamali, A., Hajiloo, A. and Nariman-zadeh, N., 2010. Reliability-based robust Pareto design of linear state feedback controllers using a multi-objective uniform-diversity genetic algorithm (MUGA). Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 401-413.
18. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R.C., 1995. Particle swarms optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, vol. IV, 27 November-December, Perth, Australia. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 1942-1948.
19. Khalkhali, A., Darvizeh, A., Nariman-zadeh, N., Masoumi, A. and Darvizeh, M., 2010. Reliability-based robust multi-objective crashworthiness of S-shaped box beams with parametric uncertainty. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 15 (4), 443-456.
20. Kristinson, K. and Dumont, G., 1992. System identification and control using genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 22 (5), 1033-1046.
21. Moore, J. and Chapman, R., 1999. Application of particle swarm to multi-objective optimization. Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
22. Mostaghim, S. and Teich, J., 2003. Strategies for finding good local guides in multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO). Proceedings of the IEEE swarm intelligence symposium, 24-26April, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center, 26-33.