Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 90, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1094-1099

  Thorsell, Malin ^a   LyrenÎs, Sven ^a   Andolf, Ellika ^a   Kaijser, Magnus ^a,b  

^a DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adverse effects; emergency cesarean section; induction of labor; labor and delivery; parity; post term pregnancy; prostaglandins; transcervical catheter

Indexed keywords

PROSTAGLANDIN E2;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR ONSET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MULTIPARA; NULLIPARA; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL RISK; SWEDEN;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BODY MASS INDEX; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EMERGENCIES; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, POSTMATURE; LABOR, INDUCED; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SWEDEN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052977893     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Pateisky N, Kimberger O, Chalubinski K, Mayerhofer K, et al,. Influence of labor induction on obstetric outcomes in patients with prolonged pregnancy: a comparison between elective labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor beyond term. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005; 117: 287-92.
2. Cnattingius R, Hoglund B, Kieler H,. Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005; 84: 456-62. (Pubitemid 40663446)
3. EPC. Folkhälsan i siffror. Stockholm, Sweden: National Board of Health and Welfare, 2003.
4. Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Gienger A, Cheng YW, McDonald KM, et al,. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 252-63, W53- 63.
5. Crowley P,. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2): CD000170.
6. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A,. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 1587-92.
7. Hannah ME, Huh C, Hewson SA, Hannah WJ,. Postterm pregnancy: putting the merits of a policy of induction of labor into perspective. Birth 1996; 23: 13-19. (Pubitemid 126443488)
8. Maslow AS, Sweeny AL,. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95 (6 Pt 1): 917-22.
9. Menticoglou SM, Hall PF,. Routine induction of labor at 41 weeks gestation: noncensus consensus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 109: 485-91. (Pubitemid 37337985)
10. Prysak M, Castronova FC,. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 47-52. (Pubitemid 28285318)
11. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL,. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94: 600-7. (Pubitemid 29460948)
12. Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ,. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 690-7. (Pubitemid 40432183)
13. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M,. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180 (3 Pt 1): 628-33. (Pubitemid 29149138)
14. Cnattingius S, Ericson A, Gunnarskog J, Kallen B,. A quality study of a medical birth registry. Scand J Soc Med. 1990; 18: 143-8. (Pubitemid 20183321)
15. World Health Organization. ICD-10: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: tenth revision. 2nd edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
16. SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT® 9.1 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
17. Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P,. Induction of labor for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4): CD004945.
18. Ingemarsson I, Kallen K,. Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76,761 postterm pregnancies in Sweden, 1982-1991: a register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 658-62. (Pubitemid 27344721)