Toward shared care for people with cancer: Developing the model with patients and GPs

Family Practice

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 554-564

  Hall, Susan J ^a   Samuel, Leslie M ^b   Murchie, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aftercare; Cancer; Health care delivery, integrated; Primary care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CANCER; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MELANOMA; PATIENT CARE; PROSTATE CANCER; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT;

AFTERCARE; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SCOTLAND;

EID: 80052946736     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: 14602229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmr012     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Roberts DLL, Anstey AV, Barlow RJ. Cox NH on behalf of the British Association of Dermatologists, and Newton Bishop JA, Corrie PG, Evans J, Gore ME, Hall PN and Kirkham N, on behalf of the Melanoma Study Group. UK guidelines for the management of cutaneousmelanoma. Br JDermatol 2002; 146: 7-17.
2. Scholefield JH, Steele RJ. Guidelines for follow-up after resection of colorectal cancer. Gut 2002; 51: v3-5.
3. SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network). Guideline 76-Long-term Follow-up of Survivors of Childhood Cancer. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2004.
4. Van As NJ, Gilbert DC, Money-Kyrle J. Evidence-based pragmatic guidelines for the follow-up of testicular cancer: optimising the detection of relapse. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 1894-902.
5. MacBride SK, Whyte F. Survivorship and the cancer follow-up clinic. Eur J Cancer Care 1998; 7: 47-55.
6. SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network). Guideline 85-Management of Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2005.
7. Grunfeld E, Fitzpatrick R, MantD et al. Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 705-10.
8. Cancer Research UK. Survival Statistics for the Most Common Cancers. http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/survival/latestrates/index.htm (accessed on 4 October 2010).
9. Stanton AL. Psychosocial concerns and interventions for cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 5132-7.
10. Helgesen F, Andersson SO, Gustafsson O et al. Follow-up of prostate cancer by on-demand contacts with a specialist nurse. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000; 34: 55-61.
11. Brown L, Payne S, Royle G. Patient initiated follow-up of breast cancer. Psychooncology 2002; 11: 346-55.
12. Moore S, Corner J, Haviland J. Nurse-led follow-up and conventional medical follow up in management of patients with lung cancer: randomised trial. Br Med J 2002; 325: 1145-51.
13. Wattchow DA, Weller DP, Esterman A et al. General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer 2006; 94: 1116-21.
14. Murchie P, Nicolson MC, Hannaford PC et al. Patient satisfaction with GP-led melanoma follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer 2010; 102: 1447-55.
15. Koinberg IL, Fridlund B, Engholm GB, Holmberg L. Nurse-led follow-up on demand or by a physician after breast cancer surgery: a randomised study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004; 8: 109-17.
16. Moses SH, Olaitan A, Murcdoch JB. A pilot randomised controlled study of three models of follow-up of patients treated for gynaecological cancer: attitudes in general practice and feasibility of randomisation. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24: 165-6.
17. Wood ML, McWilliam CL. Cancer in remission. Challenges in collaboration for family physicians and oncologists. Can Fam Physician 1996; 42: 889-904.
18. Murchie P, Delaney EK, Campbell NC, Hannaford PC. GP-led melanoma follow-up: the practical experience of GPs. Fam Pract 2009; 26: 317-24.
19. Murchie P, Delaney EK, Campbell NC, Hannaford PC. GP-led melanoma follow-up: views and feelings of patient participants. Support Care Cancer 2009; 18: 225-33.
20. Papagrigoriadis S, Heyman B. Patients' views on follow-up of colorectal cancer: implications for risk communication and decision making. Postgrad Med J 2003; 79: 403-7.
21. Papagrigoriadis S, Heyman B. The needs of general practitioners in the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 127: 541-4.
22. Grunfeld E, Mant D, Vessey MP, Fitzpatrick R. Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice. Fam Pract 1995; 12: 60-5.
23. Dancey A, Rayatt S, Courthold J, Roberts J. Views of UK melanoma patients on routine follow-up care.Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58: 245-50.
24. Hickmann M, Drummond N, Grimshaw J. A taxonomy of sharedcare for chronic disease. J Public Health Med 1994; 16: 447-54.
25. Smith SM, Allwright S, O'Dowd T. Does sharing care across the primary-speciality interface improve outcomes in chronic disease? A systematic review. Am JManag Care 2008; 14: 213-24.
26. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council Guidance. Br Med J 2008; 337: 979-83.
27. Murchie P, Hannaford PC, Wyke S, Nicolson MC, Campbell NC. Designing an integrated follow-up programme for people treated for cutaneous malignant melanoma: a practical application of theMRC framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Fam Pract 2007; 24: 283-92.
28. Mason J. Qualitative Researching. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2002.
29. Murchie P, Delaney EK, Campbell NC, Hannaford PC. GP-led melanoma follow-up: the practical experience of GPs. Fam Pract 2009; 26: 317-24.
30. Murchie P, Delaney EK, Campbell NC, Hannaford PC. GP-led melanoma follow-up: views and feelings of patient participants. Support Care Cancer 2009; 18: 225-33.
31. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixedmethods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 2005; 33: 14-26.
32. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Method 2006; 18: 59.
33. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1984.
34. Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H. "When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me"-the role of the general practitioner in the early follow-up of patients with cancer-a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2006; 7: 19.
35. O'Toole E, Step MM, Engelhardt AB, Lewis S, Rose JH. The role of primary care physicians in advanced cancer care: perspectives of older patients and their oncologists. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: S265-8.
36. Cohen HJ. A model for the shared-care of elderly patients with cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: S300-2.
37. Nielsen JD, Palshof T, Mainz J, Jensen AB, Olesen F. Randomised controlled trial of a shared care programme for newly referred cancer patients: bridging the gap between general practice and hospital. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 263-72.
38. Holtedahl K, Norum J, Anvik T, Richardsen E. Do cancer patients benefit from short-term contact with a general practitioner following cancer treatment? A randomised, controlled study. Support Care Cancer 2005; 13: 949-56.
39. Johansson B, Berglund G, Hoffman K, Gliemelius B, Sjoden PO. The role of the general practitioner in cancer care and the effect of an extended information routine. Scand J Prim Health Care 2000; 18: 143-8.