In vivo evaluation of quantitative MR angiography in a canine carotid artery stenosis model

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1552-1559

  Calderon Arnulphi, M ^a   Amin Hanjani, Sepideh ^a   Alaraj, A ^a   Zhao, M ^a   Du, X ^a   Ruland, S ^a   Zhou, X J ^a   Thulborn, K R ^a   Charbel, F T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD FLOWMETRY; BRAIN ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CAROTID ARTERY FLOW; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTAL DOG; HEMODYNAMICS; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MECHANICAL PROBE; NONHUMAN; PULSATILE FLOW; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TOURNIQUET;

ANIMALS; CAROTID STENOSIS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOGS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;

EID: 80052908824     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2546     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Wada T, Kodaira K, Fujishiro K, et al. Correlation of common carotid flow volume measured by ultrasonic quantitative flowmeter with pathological findings. Stroke 1991;22:319-23
2. Levine RL, Turski PA, Turnipseed WD, et al. Vasodilatory responses and magnetic resonance angiography: extracranial and intracranial intravascular flow data. J Neuroimaging 1997;7:152-58 (Pubitemid 27310297)
3. Knappertz VA, Tegeler CH, Myers LG. Clinical cerebrovascular applications of arterial ultrasound volume flow rate estimates. J Neuroimaging 1996;6:1-7 (Pubitemid 26035570)
4. Alexandrov AV, Babikian VL, Adams RJ, et al. The evolving role of transcranial Doppler in stroke prevention and treatment. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;7:101-04
5. Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Yoshimoto T. Cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide and outcome in patients with symptomatic internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: a xenon-133 single-photon emission computed tomography study. Stroke 2002;33:1857-62 (Pubitemid 34761076)
6. Jungreis CA, Yonas H, Firlik AD, et al. Advanced CT imaging (functional CT). Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1999;9:455-64 (Pubitemid 29416052)
7. Pantano P, Baron JC, Lebrun-Grandie P, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in human aging. Stroke 1984;15:635-41 (Pubitemid 14090237)
8. Wintermark M, Thiran JP, Maeder P, et al. Simultaneous measurement of regional cerebral blood flow by perfusion CT and stable xenon CT: a validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:905-14 (Pubitemid 32436235)
9. Butcher K, Parsons M, Allport L, et al. Rapid assessment of perfusion-diffusion mismatch. Stroke 2008;39:75-81
10. Zananiri FV, Jackson PC, Goddard PR, et al. An evaluation of the accuracy of flow measurements using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Med Eng Technol 1991;15:170-76
11. Ley S, Unterhinninghofen R, Ley-Zaporozhan J, et al. Validation of magnetic resonance phase-contrast flow measurements in the main pulmonary artery and aorta using perivascular ultrasound in a large animal model. Invest Radiol 2008;43:421-26 (Pubitemid 351769900)
12. Pelc LR, Pelc NJ, Rayhill SC, et al. Arterial and venous blood flow: noninvasive quantitation with MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:809-12
13. Pettigrew RI, Dannels W, Galloway JR, et al. Quantitative phase-flow MR imaging in dogs by using standard sequences: comparison with in vivo flowmeter measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:411-14 (Pubitemid 17007243)
14. Tang C, Blatter DD, Parker DL. Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:377-85
15. Hofman MB, Visser FC, van Rossum AC, et al. In vivo validation of magnetic resonance blood volume flow measurements with limited spatial resolution in small vessels. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:778-84
16. Zhao M, Charbel FT, Alperin N, et al. Improved phase-contrast flow quantification by three-dimensional vessel localization. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:697-706 (Pubitemid 30626359)
17. Ashley WW, Amin-Hanjani S, Alaraj A, et al. Flow-assisted surgical cerebral revascularization. Neurosurg Focus 2008;24:E20
18. Amin-Hanjani S, Shin JH, Zhao M, et al. Evaluation of extracranial-intracranial bypass using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography. J Neurosurg 2007;106:291-98 (Pubitemid 46203158)
19. Amin-Hanjani S, Du X, Zhao M, et al. Use of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography to stratify stroke risk in symptomatic vertebrobasilar disease. Stroke 2005;36:1140-45 (Pubitemid 40798729)
20. Charbel FT, Zhao M, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. A patient-specific computer model to predict outcomes of the balloon occlusion test. J Neurosurg 2004;101:977-88 (Pubitemid 43186450)
21. Prabhakaran S, Warrior L, Wells KR, et al. The utility of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of intracranial in-stent stenosis. Stroke 2009;40:991-93
22. Karmonik C, Klucznik R, Benndorf G. Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics - preliminary experience. Rofo 2008;180:209-15 (Pubitemid 351985193)
23. Bauer AM, Amin-Hanjani S, Alaraj A, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of the subclavian steal syndrome: report of 5 patients. J Neuroimaging 2009;19:250-52
24. Ruland S, Ahmed A, Thomas K, et al. Leptomeningeal collateral volume flow assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in large-vessel cerebrovascular disease. J Neuroimaging 2009;19:27-30
25. Amin-Hanjani S, Meglio G, Gatto R, et al. The utility of intraoperative blood flow measurement during aneurysm surgery using an ultrasonic perivascular flow probe. Neurosurgery 2006;58(4 suppl 2):ONS-305-312, discussion ONS-312
26. Amin-Hanjani S, Du X, Mlinarevich N, et al. The cut flow index: an intraoperative predictor of the success of extracranial-intracranial bypass for occlusive cerebrovascular disease. Neurosurgery 2005;56:75- 85, discussion 75-85
27. Charbel FT, Hoffman WE, Misra M, et al. Ultrasonic perivascular flow probe: technique and application in neurosurgery. Neurol Res 1998;20:439-42 (Pubitemid 28304579)
28. Wen C, Li M, Whitworth JA. Validation of transonic small animal flowmeter for measurement of cardiac output and regional blood flow in the rat. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1996;27:482-86 (Pubitemid 26107137)
29. Alback A, Makisalo H, Nordin A, et al. Validity and reproducibility of transit time flowmetry. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1996;85:325-31 (Pubitemid 27059839)
30. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10 (Pubitemid 16134762)
31. McGill R, Tukey JW, Larsen WA. Variations of box plots. Am Stat 1978;32:12-16
32. Zhao M, Amin-Hanjani S, Ruland S, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow using quantitative MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1470-73 (Pubitemid 47462929)
33. Hendrikse J, van Raamt AF, van der Graaf Y, et al. Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the circle of Willis. Radiology 2005;235:184-89 (Pubitemid 40432253)
34. Nasiraei-Moghaddam A, Behrens G, Fatouraee N, et al. Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:300-09 (Pubitemid 39025274)
35. O'Brien KR, Cowan BR, Jain M, et al. MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:210-18 (Pubitemid 351956485)
36. Stahlberg F, Sondergaard L, Thomsen C, et al. Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging: a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:13-23
37. Eichenberger AC, Jenni R, von Schulthess GK. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:971-77 (Pubitemid 23141234)
38. Gatenby JC, Gore JC. Mapping of turbulent intensity by magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson B 1994;104:119-26
39. Turk AS, Johnson KM, Lum D, et al. Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:111-15 (Pubitemid 46147545)
40. Karmonik C, Basto P, Vickers K, et al. Quantitative segmentation of principal carotid atherosclerotic lesion components by feature space analysis based on multicontrast MRI at 1.5 T. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009;56:352-60
41. Klem I, Rehwald WG, Heitner JF, et al. Noninvasive assessment of blood flow based on magnetic resonance global coherent free precession. Circulation 2005;111:1033-39 (Pubitemid 40354522)
42. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743-49 (Pubitemid 43079762)
43. Lum DP, Johnson KM, Paul RK, et al. Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine - retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. Radiology 2007;245:751-60 (Pubitemid 350127345)
44. Moftakhar R, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Johnson K, et al. Noninvasive measurement of intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow pattern using phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1710-14 (Pubitemid 47598145)