Least squares surface reconstruction from gradients: Direct algebraic methods with spectral, Tikhonov, and constrained regularization

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2529-2536

  Harker, Matthew ^a   O'leary, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEOBEN   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER VISION; FOURIER SERIES; ITERATIVE METHODS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; POLYNOMIALS;

COMPUTER VISION PROBLEMS; DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITION; GENERALIZED FOURIER SERIES; ITERATIVE TECHNIQUE; LEAST SQUARES SOLUTIONS; STATE-OF-THE-ART ALGORITHMS; STATE-OF-THE-ART TECHNIQUES; TIKHONOV REGULARIZATION;

SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 80052901894     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995427     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. A. Agrawal, R. Raskar, and R. Chellappa. What is the range of surface reconstruction from a gradient field? In ECCV 2006, pages 578-591, Graz, Austria, 2006. LNCS.
2. R. Bartels and G. Stewart. Algorithm 432: Solution of the matrix equation AX + XB = C. Comm. ACM, 15:820-826, 1972.
3. R. Burden and J. Faires. Numerical Analysis. Thomson Learning, Inc., eighth edition, 2005.
4. st Workshop on PACV, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2007.
5. H. Engl, M. Hanke, and A. Neubauer. Regularization of Inverse Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL, 2000.
6. R. Frankot and R. Chellappa. A method for enforcing integrability in shape from shading algorithms. IEEE PAMI, 10(4):439-451, 1988.
7. G. Golub, S. Nash, and C. Van Loan. A Hessenberg-Schur method for the problem AX+XB = C. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 24(6):909-913, 1979.
8. rd edition, 1996.
9. M. Harker and P. O'Leary. Least squares surface reconstruction from measured gradient fields. In CVPR 2008, pages 1-7, Anchorage, AK, 2008. IEEE.
10. B. Horn and M. Brooks. The variational approach to shape from shading. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 33:174-208, 1986.
11. I. Horovitz and N. Kiryati. Depth from gradient fields and control points: bias correction in photometric stereo. Image and Vision Computing, 22:681-694, 2004.
12. B. Karaçali and W. Snyder. Reconstructing discontinuous surfaces from a given gradient field using parial integrability. Comp. Vis. and Image Underst., 92:78-111, 2003.
13. P. Kovesi. Shapelets correlated with surface normals produce surfaces. In IEEE ICCV, pages 994-1001, Beijing, 2005.
14. H.-S. Ng, T.-P. Wu, and C.-K. Tang. Surface-from-gradients without discrete integrability enforcement: A gaussian kernel approach. IEEE PAMI, to appear, 2010.
15. th ICVGIP, pages 150-157, Bhubaneswar, India, 2008. IEEE.
16. A. Robles-Kelly and E. Hancock. A graph-spectral method for surface height recovery. Pattern Rec., 38:1167-1186, 2005.
17. P. Schönemann. On the formal differentiation of traces and determinants. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20:113-139, 1985.
18. T. Simchony, R. Chellappa, and M. Shao. Direct analytical methods for solving Poisson equations in computer vision. IEEE PAMI, 12(5):435-446, 1990.
19. G. Stewart. Matrix Algorithms, volume II: Eigensystems. SIAM, Philadelphia, 2001.
20. R. Woodham. Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images. Optical Engineering, 19(1):139-144, 1980.
21. Z. Wu and L. Li. A line integration based method for depth recovery from surface normals. In IEEE ICPR, pages 591-595, Rome, 1988. IEEE.