Reconstructing discontinuous surfaces from a given gradient field using partial integrability

Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 78-111

  Karaçali, Bilge ^a   Snyder, Wesley ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Feasible subspace; Gradient field; Gradient space; Integrability; Projection; Surface reconstruction; Vector space methods

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGING SYSTEMS; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; VECTORS;

BLOCK PROCESSING TECHNIQUES;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 10744219784     PISSN: 10773142     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1077-3142(03)00095-X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. R.J. Woodham, Photometric stereo: a reflectance map technique for determining surface orientations from a single view, in: Proc. SPIE, Image Understanding Systems and Industrial Applications, vol. 155, 1978, pp. 136-143.
2. H.D. Tagare, R.J.P. deFigueiredo, A theory of photometric stereo for a class of diffuse non-Lambertian surfaces, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 13 (2) (1991) 133-152.
3. T. Okatani, K. Deguchi, On uniqueness of solutions of the three-light-source photometric stereo: conditions on illumination, Comput. Vision Image Understanding 81 (2) (2001) 211-226.
4. R. Zhang, M. Shah, Iterative shape recovery from multiple images, Image Vision Comput. 15 (11) (1997) 801-814.
5. B.K.P. Horn, Robot Vision, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
6. L. Noakes, R. Kozera, R. Klette, The lawn-mowing algorithm for noisy gradient vector fields, in: Proc. 44th Annual Meeting of the SPIE, Stream Vision Geometry VIII, vol. 3811, 1999, pp. 305-316.
7. L. Noakes, R. Kozera, A 2d leap-frog algorithm for optimal surface reconstruction, in: Proc. 44th Annual Meeting of the SPIE, Stream Vision Geometry VIII, vol. 3811, 1999, pp. 317-328.
8. R.T. Frankot, R. Chellappa, A method for enforcing integrability in shape from shading algorithms, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 10 (4) (1988) 439-451.
9. R.T. Frankot, R. Chellappa, A method for enforcing integrability in shape from shading algorithms, in: B.K.P. Horn, M.J. Brooks (Eds.), Shape from Shading, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989, pp. 89-122 (Chapter 5).
10. J.-W. Hsieh, H.-Y.M. Liao, M.-T. Ko, K.-C. Fan, Wavelet-based shape from shading, Graphical Models Image Process. 57 (4) (1995) 343-362.
11. B.-H. Kim, R.-H. Park, Shape from shading and photometric stereo using surface approximation by legendre polynomials, Comput. Vision Image Understanding 66 (3) (1997) 255-270.
12. B. Karaçali, W. Snyder, Partial integrability in surface reconstruction from a given gradient field, in: International Conference on Image Processing, 2002.
13. A.K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
14. S.G. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Academic Press, San Diego, 1998.
15. S. Mallat, A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 11 (7) (1989) 674-693.
16. S.G. Chang, Y. Bin, M. Vetterli, Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9 (9) (2000) 1532-1546.
17. B. Karaçali, H. Krim, I.C. Schick, Wavelet-based methods in global positioning system signal tracking, in: SPIE Proceedings, AeroSense, vol. 4056, Orlando, FL, 2000, pp. 127-136.
18. D.L. Donoho, I.M. Johnstone, Ideal denoising in an orthonormal basis chosen from a library of bases, Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I 319.
19. H. Krim, S. Mallat, D. Donoho, A.S. Willsky, Best basis algorithm for signal enhancement, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1995.
20. I. Daubechies, Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 41 (1988) 909-996.
21. B. Karaçali, Signal reconstruction using the cross-scale correlation properties of the wavelet decomposition, Technical Report TR 99/13, North Carolina State University, Center for Advanced Computing and Communications, 1999.
22. A. Rosenfeld, R. Hummel, S. Zucker, Scene labeling by relaxation operations, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybernet. 6 (6) (1976) 420-433.
23. J. Kittler, J. Illingsworth, Relaxation labeling algorithms: a review, Image Vision Comput. 3 (4) (1985) 206-221.
24. T. Haenselmann, W. Effelsberg, Texture resynthesize using principle component analysis, in: Proc. SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VII, vol. 4662, 2002.
25. L. van Hateren, J. Ruderman, Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265 (1998) 2315-2320.