Scene shape from texture of objects

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2017-2024

  Payet, Nadia ^a   Todorovic, Sinisa ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING; STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

GROUND TRUTH; IMAGE REGIONS; OPTIMAL POLICIES; RECONSTRUCTED SURFACES; SCENE INTERPRETATION; SHAPE FROM TEXTURE; SINGLE IMAGES; STEREO-IMAGE;

OBJECT DETECTION;

EID: 80052899385     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995326     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. P. Arbelaez, M. Maire, C. Fowlkes, and J. Malik. From contours to regions: An empirical evaluation. In CVPR, 2009.
2. S. Y.-Z. Bao, M. Sun, and S. Savarese. Toward coherent object detection and scene layout understanding. In CVPR, pages 65-72, June 2010.
3. N. Cornelis, B. Leibe, K. Cornelis, and L. Gool. 3d urban scene modeling integrating recognition and reconstruction. IJCV, 78:121-141, July 2008.
4. C. Desai, D. Ramanan, and C. Fowlkes. Discriminative models for multi-class object layout. In ICCV, 2009.
5. P. F. Felzenszwalb, R. B. Girshick, D. McAllester, and D. Ramanan. Object detection with discriminatively trained partbased models. IEEE TPAMI, 32:1627-1645, 2010.
6. S. Gould, R. Fulton, and D. Koller. Decomposing a scene into geometric and semantically consistent regions. In ICCV, pages 1-8, 2009.
7. A. Gupta, A. A. Efros, and M. Hebert. Blocks world revisited: Image understanding using qualitative geometry and mechanics. In ECCV, 2010.
8. J. H. Hays, M. Leordeanu, A. A. Efros, and Y. Liu. Discovering texture regularity as a higher-order correspondence problem. In ECCV, volume 2, pages 522-535, 2006.
9. V. Hedau, D. Hoiem, and D. Forsyth. Thinking inside the box: Using appearance models and context based on room geometry. In ECCV, pages VI:224-237, 2010.
10. D. Hoiem, A. Efros, and M. Hebert. Closing the loop in scene interpretation. In CVPR, 2008.
11. D. Hoiem, A. A. Efros, and M. Hebert. Geometric context from a single image. In ICCV, pages 654-661, 2005.
12. D. Hoiem, A. A. Efros, and M. Hebert. Recovering surface layout from an image. IJCV, 75(1):151-172, 2007.
13. H. D. III, J. Langford, and D. Marcu. Search-based structured prediction. Machine Learning Journal, 2009.
14. L. P. Kaelbling, M. L. Littman, and A. W. Moore. Reinforcement learning: A survey. JAIR, 4:237-285, 1996.
15. T. K. Leung and J. Malik. Detecting, localizing and grouping repeated scene elements from an image. In ECCV, volume 1, pages 546-555, 1996.
16. L.-J. Li, R. Socher, and L. Fei-Fei. Towards total scene understanding: classification, annotation and segmentation in an automatic framework. In CVPR, 2009.
17. W.-C. Lin and Y. Liu. A lattice-based MRF model for dynamic near-regular texture tracking. IEEE TPAMI, 29(5):777-792, 2007.
18. A. Lobay and D. A. Forsyth. Shape from texture without boundaries. IJCV, 67(1):71-91, 2006.
19. A. Loh and R. Hartley. Shape from non-homogeneous, nonstationary, anisotropic, perspective texture. In BMVC, 2005.
20. V. Nedovic, A. W. M. Smeulders, A. Redert, and J. M. Geusebroek. Stages as models of scene geometry. IEEE TPAMI, 32(9):1673-1687, 2010.
21. B. C. Russell, A. Torralba, K. P. Murphy, and W. T. Freeman. Labelme: a database and web-based tool for image annotation. IJCV, 77(1-3):157-173, 2008.
22. D. Scharstein and R. Szeliski. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. IJCV, 47:7-42, April 2002.