Beyond Alhazen's problem: Analytical projection model for non-central catadioptric cameras with quadric mirrors

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2993-3000

  Agrawal, Amit ^a   Taguchi, Yuichi ^a   Ramalingam, Srikumar ^a  

^a MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGING SYSTEMS; MIRRORS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; TELESCOPES; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

BUNDLE ADJUSTMENTS; CATADIOPTRIC CAMERAS; CENTRAL CATADIOPTRIC CAMERAS; CENTRAL CATADIOPTRIC SYSTEMS; PARABOLIC MIRRORS; PERSPECTIVE CAMERAS; PROJECTION EQUATIONS; PROJECTION MODELS;

CAMERAS;

EID: 80052895149     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995596     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. A. Agrawal, Y. Taguchi, and S. Ramalingam. Analytical forward projection for axial non-central dioptric and catadioptric cameras. In ECCV, volume 6313, pages 129-143, 2010.
2. M. Baker. Alhazen's problem. American J. Mathematics, 4(1):327-331, 1881.
3. S. Baker and S. Nayar. A theory of single-viewpoint catadioptric image formation. IJCV, 35(2):175-196, Nov. 1999.
4. R. Bunschoten and B. Kröse. Robust scene reconstruction from an omnidirectional vision system. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, 19(2):351-357, Apr. 2003.
5. V. Caglioti, P. Taddei, G. Boracchi, S. Gasparini, and A. Giusti. Single-image calibration of off-axis catadioptric cameras using lines. In OMNIVIS, Oct. 2007.
6. M. Chen and J. Arvo. Theory and application of specular path perturbation. ACM Trans. Graph., 19(4):246-278, 2000.
7. R. Collins. A space-sweep approach to true multi-image matching. In CVPR, pages 358-363, Jun. 1996.
8. Y. Ding, J. Yu, and P. Sturm. Multi-perspective stereo matching and volumetric reconstruction. In ICCV, pages 1827-1834, Sept. 2009.
9. C. Geyer and K. Daniilidis. Structure and motion from uncalibrated catadioptric views. In CVPR, pages 279-286, 2001.
10. G. Glaeser. Reflections on spheres and cylinders of revolution. J. Geometry and Graphics, 3(2):121-139, 1999.
11. N. Gonçalvez and A. C. Nogueira. Projection through quadric mirrors made faster. In OMNIVIS, pages 2141-2148, 2009.
12. M. Kanbara, N. Ukita, M. Kidode, and N. Yokoya. 3D scene reconstruction from reflection images in a spherical mirror. In ICPR, volume 4, pages 874-879, 2006.
13. S. B. Kang and R. Szeliski. 3-D scene data recovery using omnidirectional multibaseline stereo. In CVPR, pages 364-370, 1996.
14. Y. Kojima, R. Sagawa, T. Echigo, and Y. Yagi. Calibration and performance evaluation of omnidirectional sensor with compound spherical mirrors. In OMNIVIS, 2005.
15. S. Kuthirummal and S. Nayar. Multiview radial catadioptric imaging for scene capture. ACM Trans. Graph., 25(3):916-923, 2006.
16. K. Kutulakos and S. Seitz. A theory of shape by space carving. IJCV, 38(3):199-218, 2000.
17. D. Lanman, D. Crispell, M. Wachs, and G. Taubin. Spherical catadioptric arrays: Construction, multi-view geometry, and calibration. In DPVT, pages 81-88, 2006.
18. M. Lhuillier. Toward flexible 3d modeling using a catadioptric camera. In CVPR, pages 1-8, June 2007.
19. M. Lhuillier. Automatic scene structure and camera motion using a catadioptric system. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 109(2):186-203, Feb. 2008.
20. B. Micusik and T. Pajdla. Autocalibration and 3D reconstruction with non-central catadioptric cameras. In CVPR, pages 58-65, 2004.
21. S. Nayar. Sphereo: Determining depth using two specular spheres and a single camera. In SPIE Conf. Optics, Illumination, and Image Sensing for Machine Vision III, pages 245-254, Nov. 1988.
22. S. A. Nene and S. K. Nayar. Stereo with mirrors. In ICCV, pages 1087-1094, Jan. 1998.
23. S. Roth and M. Black. Specular flow and the recovery of surface structure. In CVPR, volume 2, pages 1869-1876, June 2006.
24. R. Swaminathan, M. Grossberg, and S. Nayar. A perspective on distortions. In CVPR, volume 2, pages 594-601, 2003.
25. R. Swaminathan, M. Grossberg, and S. Nayar. Non-single viewpoint catadioptric cameras: Geometry and analysis. IJCV, 66(3):211-229, Mar. 2006.
26. Y. Taguchi, A. Agrawal, S. Ramalingam, and A. Veeraraghavan. Axial light field for curved mirrors: Reflect your perspective, widen your view. In CVPR, pages 499-506, June 2010.
27. Y. Taguchi, A. Agrawal, A. Veeraraghavan, S. Ramalingam, and R. Raskar. Axial-cones: Modeling spherical catadioptric cameras for wide-angle light field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph., 29(6):172:1-172:8, Dec. 2010.
28. J. Unger, A. Wenger, T. Hawkins, A. Gardner, and P. Debevec. Capturing and rendering with incident light fields. In EGSR, pages 141-149, 2003.
29. B. Vandeportaele. Contributions à la vision omnidirectionnelle: Étude, Conception et Étalonnage de capteurs pour lacquisition dimages et la modélisation 3D. PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, France, Dec. 2006. in French.