Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 247-254

  Alsabeeha, Nabeel H M ^a   Swain, Michael V ^b   Payne, Alan G T ^b  

^a Ministry of Health United Arab Emirates   (United Arab Emirates)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; GOLD ALLOY; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NITRIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE PRECISION ATTACHMENT; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 80052893552     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentur. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:413-414.
2. Kronström M, Davis B, Loney R, Gerrow J, Hollender L. A prospective randomized study on the immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one or two implants: A 12-month follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:181-188.
3. Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:331-339.
4. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Castagna S. Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: A five-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:159-165.
5. Preiskel HW. Overdentures Made Easy: A Guide to Implant and Root Supported Prostheses. London: Quintessence, 1996.
6. Besimo CH, Graber G, Flühler M. Retention force changes in implant-supported titanium telescope crowns over long-term use in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:372-378.
7. Shafie H. Clinical and Laboratory Manual of Implant Overdentures. Ames: Blackwell, 2007.
8. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Swain MV. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: A review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22:429-440.
9. Halling J. Wear and the properties of materials. In: Mott N, Fuller AT (eds). Introduction to Tribology. London: Wykham Publications, 1976:63-82.
10. Bayer S, Grüner M, Keilig L, et al. Investigation of the wear of prefabricated attachments-An in vitro study of retention forces and fitting tolerances. Quintessence Int 2007;38:e229-237.
11. Fromentin O, Picard B, Tavernier B. In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999;11:391-397.
12. Gamborena JI, Hazelton LR, NaBadalung D, Brudvik J. Retention of ERA direct overdenture attachments before and after fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:123-130.
13. Wolf K, Ludwig K, Hartfil H, Kern M. Analysis of retention and wear of ball attachments. Quintessence Int 2009;40:405-412.
14. Wichmann MG, Kuntze W. Wear behavior of precision attachments. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:409-414.
15. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Schmitt S. The effect of simulated function on the retention of bar-clip retained removable prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:570-573.
16. Rutkunas V, Mizutani H, Takahashi H. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34:41-51.
17. Besimo CE, Guarneri A. In vitro retention force changes of prefabricated attachments for overdentures. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30:671-678.
18. Lehmann KM, Arnim FV. Studies on the retention forces on snapon attachments. Quintessence Dent Technol 1978;7:45-48.
19. Setz I, Lee SH, Engel E. Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:323-329.
20. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 2004;19:3-20.
21. Alsabeeha NHM, Payne AGT, De Silva RK, Thomson WM. Mandibular single-implant overdentures: Preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems [epub ahead of print 27 September 2010]. Clin Oral Implants Res doi: 10.1111/ j.1600-0501.2010.02004.x.
22. Payne AG, Walton TR, Walton JN, Solomons YF. The outcome of implant overdentures from a prosthodontic perspective:Proposal for a classification protocol. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14:27-32.
23. Watson RM, Jemt T, Chai J, et al. Prosthodontic treatment, patient response, and the need for maintenance of complete implant-supported overdentures: An appraisal of 5 years of prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:345-354.
24. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. A prospective study on the maintenance of implant prostheses in private practice. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:453-458.
25. Vlasveld D, Groenwold J, Bersee H, Picken S. Moisture absorption in polyamide-6 silicate nanocomposites and its influence on the mechanical properties. Polymer 2005;46:12567-12576.
26. Alsabeeha N, Atieh M, Swain MV, Payne AG. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: An in vitro retention force investigation on different designs. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:160-166.