RFID application in animal monitoring

The Internet of Things: From RFID to the Next-Generation Pervasive Networked Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 165-184

  Ntafis, Vasileios ^a   Patrikakis, Charalampos Z ^b   Fragkiadaki, Eirini G ^a   Xylouri Fragkiadaki, Eftychia M ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052869947     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Antonini, C., Trabalza-Marinucci, M., Franceschini, R., Mughetti, L., Acuti, G., Faba, A., Asdrubali, G., and Boiti, C. (2006) In vivo mechanical and in vitro electromagnetic side-effects of a ruminal transponder in cattle, J. Anim. Sci., 84: 3133-3142.
2. Babot, D., Hernandez-Jover, M., Caja, G., Santamarina, C., and Ghirardi, J.J. (2006) Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: On-farm performances, J. Anim Sci., 84: 2575-2581.
3. Beharka, A.A., Nagaraja, T.G., Morrill, J.L., Kennedy, G.A., and Klemm, R.D. (1998) Effects of form of the diet on anatomical, microbial, and fermentative development of the rumen of neonatal calves, J. Diary Sci., 81: 1946-1955.
4. Block, B.A., Costa, D.P., Boehlert, G.W., and Kochevar, R.E. (2003) Revealing pelagic habitat use: The tagging of Pacific pelagic program, Oceanological Acta 25: 255-266.
5. Caja, G., Ribo, O., and Nehring, R. (1998) Evaluation of migratory distance of passive transponders injected in different body sites of adult sheep for electronic identification, Livestock Prod. Sci., 55: 279-289.
6. Caja, G., Conill, C., Nehring, R., and Ribo, O. (1999) Development of a ceramic bolus for the permanent electronic identification of sheep, goat and cattle, Comp. Elec. Agric., 24(1): 45-63(19).
7. Caja, G., Hernandez-Jover, M., Conill, C., Garin, D., Alabern, X., Farriol, B., Ghirardi, J. (2005) Use of ear tags and injectable transponders for the identification and traceability of pigs from birth to the end of the slaughter line, J. Anim. Sci., 83: 2215-2224.
8. DEFRA Final Report English Trial of Electronic Identification/Electronic Data Transfer in Sheep, 2005, http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/id-move/sheep-goats/eid/pdf/ept-final.pdf, accessed May 2007.
9. Fallon, R.J., and Rogers, P.A.M. (1992) Use and recovery of different implantable electronic transponders in beef cattle and calves. Irish J. Agri. Food Res., 31: 100-101.
10. Fallon, R.J., and Rogers, P.A.M. (1999) Evaluation of implantable electronic identification systems for cattle, Irish J. Agri. Food Res., 38: 189-199.
11. Fallon, R.J., Rogers, P.A.M., and Earley, B., "Electronic Animal Identification, ARMIS No.4623, Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority." http://www.teagasc. ie/research/reports/beef/4623/eopr-4623.htm, accessed May 2007.
12. Garin, D., Caja, G., and Bocquier, F. (2003) Effect of small ruminal boluses used for electronic identification for lambs on the growth and the development of the reticuloru-men, J. Anim. Sci., 81: 879-884.
13. Hasker, P.J.S., and Bassingthwaite, J. (1996) Evaluation of electronic identification transponders implanted in the rumen of cattle, Aust. J. Exper. Agri., 36(1): 19-22.
14. Hlavacs, H., Gelies, F., Blossey, D., and Klein, B. (2005) A ubiquitous and interactive zoo guide system, INTETAIN, LNAI3814: 235-239.
15. ICAR (July 2001) Beef Recording Guidelines: a synthesis of an ICAR survey. ISSN: 1563-2504. ICAR Technical Series 6, accessed May 2007.
16. Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen. http://ipsc.jrc.cec.eu.int, accessed May 2007.
17. Jansen, M.B. and Eradus, W. (1999) Future developments on devices for animal radio frequency identification, Comp. Elec. Agri., 24: 109-117.
18. McKean, J.D. (2001) The importance of traceability for public health and consumer protection, Rev. Sci. Tech. Off Epiz, 20(2): 363-371.
19. Rieback, M.R., Crispo, B., and Tanenbaum, A.S. (March 2006) Is your cat infected with a computer virus,? Fourth IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom'06), Pisa, Italy, pp. 169-179.
20. Saa, C., Milan, M.J., Caja, G., and Ghirardi, J.J. (2005) Cost evaluation of the use of conventional and electronic identification and registration systems for the national sheep and goat populations in Spain, J. Anim. Sci., 83: 1215-1225.
21. Sheridan, M.K. (1991) Electronic identification systems: governmental considerations. In Automatic Electronic Identification Systems for Farm Animals. Proceedings of a seminar held in Brussels, Belgium, E. Lambooij (Ed.), 13198: 109-113.
22. Silva, K.O. and Naas, I. (2006) Evaluating the use of electronic identification in swine, Eng. Agríc., 26(1): 11-19.
23. Stanford, K., Stitt, J., Kellar, J.A., and McAllister, T.A. (2001) Traceability in cattle and small ruminants in Canada, Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz., 20: 510-522.
24. Streit, S., Bock, F., Pirk, C.W.W., and Tautz, J. (2003) Automatic life-long monitoring of individual insect behavior now possible, Zoology, 106: 169-171.
25. USDA, "National Center for Animal Health Programs,." http://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/ nahps/animal_id/, accessed May 2007.
26. USDA (May 2007) NAIS 2004 "Initial Pilot Projects Final Report." http://www.aphis.
27. usda.gov/newsroom/content/2007/05/content/printable/PilotProjectReportFI-NAL05-01-2007.pdf, accessed May 2007.
28. Wismans, W.M.G. (1999) Identification and registration of animals in the European Union. Comp. Elec. Agri., 24: 99-108.