Evaluation of migratory distance of passive transponders injected in different body sites of adult sheep for electronic identification

Livestock Production Science

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 279-289

  Caja, G ^a   Ribo O ^a   Nehring, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Electronic identification; Migration; Passive transponder; Sheep

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001098631     PISSN: 03016226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00137-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Caja, G., Fonseca, P.D., Luini, M., 1992. Contrato de experimentación y puesta a punto de un sistema de identificación electrónica para el control y gestion de animales de granja en las Comunidades Europeas (FEOGA Research Project). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona-Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Universidade de Évora, 21 pp.
2. Caja, G., Ribó, O., Nehring, R., 1994. Formation of fibrous capsule and migration movements at different body sites of transponders implanted in sheep for electronic identification. J. Animal Sci./J.Dairy Sci. 72/77 (Suppl 1), 307.
3. Collewet, C., Raoult, G., 1989. Equipement dans les élevages intensifs. Les matériaux d'identification des animaux. Centre National du Machinisme Agricole du Génie Rural des Eaux et des Fôrets (CEMAGREF). BTMEA 43, 26-27.
4. Fallon, R.J., Rogers, P.A.M., 1991. Use and recovery of implantable electronic transponders in beef cattle. In: E. Lambooij (Ed.), Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. Report, CEC Series: Agriculture, No. EUR 13198. Brussels, pp. 61-67.
5. Gruys, E., Schakenraad, J.M., Kruit, L.K., Bolscher, J.M., 1993. Bio-compatibility of glass-encapsulated electronic chips (transponders) used for identification of pigs. Vet. Rec. 133, 385-388.
6. Hasker, P.J.S., Bassingthwaighte, J., 1995. Implanting electronic identification transponders under the scutiform cartilage of beef cattle is inappropriate under Australian conditions. Austr. J. Exp. Agric. 35, 15-18.
7. Huiskes, J.H., 1991. The use of electronic identification in breeding and fattening management of pigs. In: E. Lambooij (Ed.), Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. Report, CEC Series: Agriculture, No. EUR 13198. Brussels, pp. 68-72.
8. Konermann, H., 1991. Identification of horses by implantation of microchips. In: E. Lambooij (Ed.), Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. Report, CEC Series: Agriculture, No. EUR 13198. Brussels, pp. 37-43.
9. Lambooij, E., 1991. Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. In: E. Lambooij (Ed.), Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. Report, CEC Series: Agriculture, No. EUR 13198. Brussels, p. 139.
10. Lambooij, E., 1991. Injectable electronic identification systems; some veterinary aspects. In: E. Lambooij (Ed.), Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. Report, CEC Series: Agriculture, No. EUR 13198. Brussels, pp. 21-27.
11. Marie, C., Caja, G., Barillet, F., Ribó, O., Nehring, R., Ricard, E., 1994. Electronic identification in sheep: initial results and considerations for application and testing of transponders. In: L. Lajoic, S. Lafontaine and P. Doyle (Compilers), Milk and beef recording: State of the art 1994. Proceedings of the 29th biennial session of the International Committee for Animal recording (ICAR). Dairy Division, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. EAAP Publication No. 75 1995 197-202.
12. Nehring, R., Caja, G., Ribó, O., Conill, C., 1996. Electronic identification of farm animals. State of the art. Abstracts v 2.0. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 102 pp.
13. Nielsen, A., 1991. The practical benefits of injected transponders in dairy cattle. In: E. Lambooij (Ed.), Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. Report, CEC Series: Agriculture, No. EUR 13198. Brussels, pp. 44-48.
14. Oakley, D., 1993. Evaluation of the use of electronic transponders to identify cattle. Final trial report. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, 28 pp.
15. Peters, E., 1991. Slaughterhouse and recovery. In: E. Lambooij (Ed.), Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. Report, CEC Series: Agriculture, No. EUR 13198. Brussels, pp. 77-80.
16. Pirkelmann, H., Wendl, G., Wendling, F., 1991. Experiences with injected transponders in calves. In: E. Lambooij (Ed.), Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. Report, CEC Series: Agriculture, No. EUR 13198. Brussels, pp. 53-60.
17. Rossing, W., Ploegaert, P., 1975. Automatic cow identification recording milk yield and feeding concentrate. Research Report IMAG, Wageningen, 75(4), pp. 1-5.
18. Russel, A.J.F., Doney, J.M., Gunn, R.G., 1969. Subjective assessment ofbody fat in live sheep. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 72, 451-454.
19. SAS Institute Inc., 1989. SAS/STAT User's guide, version 6, fourth edition, volume 1, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
20. Sigrimis, N.A., Scott, N.R., Czarniecki, C.S., 1985. A passive transponder identification system for livestock. Proceedings of the National Conference of Agricultural Electronic Applications, Chicago, pp. 9-12.
21. Spahr, S.L., 1992. Methods and systems for cow identification. In: Large dairy herd management. Van Horn, H.H., Wilcox, C.J. (Editors). Management Services, American Dairy Science Association. Champaign, Illinois, pp. 672-681.
22. Thornton, T., 1991. Application of electronic identification of beef cattle in Australia. Symposium: Electronic animal identification in agriculture. Kurhaus, Scheveningen, pp. 27-34.
23. Wade, J.M., Gallagher, M.G., Gordon, I., 1991. Electronic identification of cattle. Preliminary findings. In: E. Lambooij (Ed.), Automatic electronic identification systems for farm animals. Report, CEC Series: Agriculture, No. EUR 13198. Brussels, pp. 49-52.