Cleaning up the air: The EPA and shuttle diplomacy

Environmental Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 227-234

  Rinfret, Sara R ^a  

^a HARTWICK COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 80052854574     PISSN: 14660466     EISSN: 14660474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S146604661100024X     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Andrews, R.N.L. 2006. Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves, 2nd edition. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 544 pp.
2. Berry, J.M. 1977. Lobbying for the People: The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 344 pp.
3. Council for Excellence in Government. 2007. Working with Stakeholders: The Nonroad Diesel Rule. Report prepared for the USEPA Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Washington, DC.
4. Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). 2007, July 13. Producing Ethanol Could Restrain Resources. EDF, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.edf.org/page. cfm?tagID51550 (accessed October 1, 2008).
5. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007, April. EPA Finalizes Regulations for a Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Program for 2007 and Beyond. EPA420- F-07-019. USEPA,Washington, DC, 3 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ renewablefuels/420f07019.htm (accessed September 18, 2008).
6. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008a, March. EPA Finalizes More Stringent Regulations for Locomotives and Marine Compression- Ignition Engines [Regulatory Announcement]. EPA420-F-08-004. USEPA, Washington, DC, 5 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/nonroad/420f08004.htm#background (accessed September 20, 2008).
7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008b, March. General Position Statements. In Summary and Analysis of Comments: Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Locomotive Engines and Marine Compression Ignition Engines Less than 30 Liters Per Cylinder. EPA420-R-08-006. USEPA,Washington, DC, 463 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/nonroad/420r08006.pdf (accessed July 17, 2011).
8. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008c. Nonroad, Engines, Equipment, and Vehicles. USEPA, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/locomotives.htm (accessed July 15, 2011).
9. E-Wire. 2008.Renewable Fuel Standard Has a Huge Price Tag. E-Wire, New York. Available at http://www.ewire.com/display.cfm/Wire-ID/787 (accessed September 5, 2008).
10. Fiorino, D. In press. Environmental Bureaucracies: The Environmental Protection Agency chapter. In Oxford Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy, M.E. Kraft and S. Kamieniecki, eds. Oxford University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Fritschler, A.L. 1975. Smoking and Politics: Policymaking and the Federal Bureaucracy, 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 180 pp.
12. Furlong, S.R. 1993. Interest Group Influence on Regulatory Policy (unpublished PhD dissertation). American University, Washington, DC.
13. Furlong, S.R. 1995. Reinventing Regulatory Development at the Environmental Protection Agency. Policy Studies Journal 23(3):466-482.
14. Golden, M. 1998. Interest Groups in the Rule-Making Process: Who participates? Whose voices get heard? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(2):245-270. (Pubitemid 128549499)
15. Hebert, H.J. 2008. EPA Directs Pollution Cuts for Locomotives, Ships, and Ferries. Seattle Times, March 14. Available at http://seattletimes. nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004282753-apshiptrainpollution1stldwrite thru.html (accessed November 19, 2008).
16. Hoefer, R., and K. Ferguson. 2007. Controlling the Levers of Power: How Advocacy Organizations Affect the Regulation Writing Process. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 34(2):83-108.
17. Kamieniecki, S. 2006. Corporate America and Environmental Policy: How Often Does Business Get Its Way? Stanford Law and Politics, Stanford, CA, 348 pp.
18. Kerwin, C.M. 2003. Rulemaking: How Government AgenciesWrite Law and Make Policy, 3rd edition. Island Press, Washington, DC, 285 pp.
19. Kerwin, C.M., and S.R. Furlong. 2011. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy, 4th edition. CQ Press, Washington, DC, 344 pp.
20. Kerwin, C., S.R. Furlong, and W.West. 2010. Interest groups, rulemaking, and American bureaucracy. In The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy, R Durant, ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 888 pp.
21. Landy, M., M. Roberts, and S. Thomas. 1990. The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions from Nixon to Clinton. Oxford University Press, New York, 341 pp.
22. Lavertu, S., and S.W. Yackee. 2010. Regulatory Uncertainty and Rulemaking Deadlines. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual APPAM [Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management] Research Conference, Boston, November 4-6. Available at https://www.appam.org/conferences/fall/boston2010/sessions/ panelinfo.asp?id5POSTER-02 (accessed July 18, 2011).
23. Leedy, P.D. 1993. Practical Research Planning and Design. Macmillan, New York, 348 pp.
24. Magat,W.A., A.J. Krupnick, andW. Harrington. 1986. Rules in the Making: A Statistical Analysis of Regulatory Agency Behavior. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC, 182 pp.
25. McGarity, T.O. 1998. The Internal Structure of EPA Rulemaking. Law and Contemporary Problems 54(4):57-111.
26. McKay, A., and S.W. Yackee. 2007. Interest Group Competition on Federal Agency Rules. American Politics Research 35(3):336-357.
27. Morgan, G. 1996. Images of Organization, 2nd edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 496 pp.
28. National Corn Growers Association. 2008. NCGA Thanks EPA for Denying Request to Waive Renewable Fuel Standard. Corn & Soybean Digest, April 12. Available at http://cornandsoybeandigest.com/ncga-thanks-epadenying- request-waive-renewable-fuels-standard (accessed July 19, 2011).
29. Naughton, K., C. Schmid, S.W. Yackee, and X. Zhan. 2009. Understanding Commenter Influence during Rule Development. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 28(2):258-277.
30. Rinfret, S.R. 2011a. Behind the Shadows: Interest Groups and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 16(1):1-14.
31. Rinfret, S.R. 2011b. Frames of Influence: U.S. Environmental Rulemaking Cases. Review of Policy Research 28(3):231-246.
32. Rinfret, S.R., and S. Furlong. In press. Defining Environmental Rulemaking. In Oxford Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy, Michael E. Kraft and Sheldon Kamieniecki, eds. Oxford University Press, Cambridge, UK.
33. Vaughn, J. 2011. Environmental Politics: Domestic and Global Dimensions, 6th edition. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 394 pp.
34. Vig, N., and M. Kraft. 2009. Environmental Policy: A New Direction for the 21st Century, 6th edition. CQ Press, Washington, DC, 420 pp.
35. West, W. 2004. Formal Procedures, Informal Procedures, Accountability, and Responsiveness in Bureaucratic Policymaking: An Institutional Policy Analysis. Public Administration Review 46(2):66-80. (Pubitemid 38059191)
36. West,W. 2009. Inside the Black Box: The Development of Proposed Rules and the Limits of Procedural Controls. Administration and Society 41(5):576-599.
37. Yackee, S.W. 2006. Sweet-Talking the Fourth Branch: The Influence of Interest Group Comments on Federal Agency Rulemaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1):103-124. (Pubitemid 43528179)
38. Yackee, S.W. 2008. The Hidden Politics of Regulation: Interest Group Influence during Agency Rule Development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
39. Yin, R.K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 200 pp.