Behind the shadows: Interests, influence, and the U.S. fish andwildlife service

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-14

  Rinfret, Sara R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY   (United States)

Author keywords

Federal rulemaking; Kingdon's multiple streams model; Notice of proposed rulemaking; Organized interest groups; Pre proposal stage; U.S. fish and wildlife service

Indexed keywords

CANIS LUPUS; CICINDELIDAE; COLEOPTERA;

EID: 78751635884     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2011.536910     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Administrative Procedures Act of 1946. 5 U.S.C. Sec. 511-599.
2. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Federal Register. (2006). Proposed rule: Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Designation of critical habitat for Shivwits and Holmgren Milk Vetch. 71(2). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
4. Federal Register. (2007). Proposed rule: Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Designation of critical habitat for the Salt Creek Tiger Beetle. 72(238). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5. Fritschler, A. L. (1975). Smoking and politics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Furlong, S. R. (1993). Interest group influence on regulatory policy. (Doctoral dissertation). American University. (microfilm)
7. Furlong, S. R., & Kerwin, C. (2003). Interest group participation in rule making: A decade of change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 353-370.
8. Golden, M. (1998). Interest groups in the rule-making process: Who participates? Whose voices get heard? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 245-270.
9. Golden, M. (2003, August). All of the above (but with Congress rising): Who sets the rulemaking agendas in federal agencies? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
10. Hoefer, R., & Ferguson, K. (2007). Controlling the levers of power: How advocacy organizations affect the regulation writing process. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 34(2), 83-108.
11. Kamieniecki, S. (2006). Corporate America and environmental policy: How often does business get its way? Stanford, CA: Stanford Law and Politics.
12. Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger: A study in administrative behavior. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
13. Kerwin, C. (2003). Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policy. Washington, DC: Island Press.
14. Kerwin, C., Furlong, S. R., & West, W. (2011). Interest groups, rulemaking, and American bureaucracy. In R Durant (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Longman.
16. Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Longman.
17. Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Leedy, P. D. (1993). Practical research planning and design. New York: MacMillan.
19. Magat, W., Krupnick, A., & Harrington, W. (1986). Rules in the making: A statistical analysis of regulatory agency behavior. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
20. McKay, A., & Yackee, S. W. (2007). Interest group competition on federal agency rules. American Politics Research, 35, 336-357.
21. Naughton, K., Schmid, C., Yackee, S. W., & Zhan, X. (2009). Understanding commenter influence during rule development. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(2), 258-277.
22. Wagner, W. (2010). Administrative law, filter failure, and information capture. Duke Law Review, 59, 1251-1321.
23. West, W. (2005). Administrative rulemaking: An old and emerging literature. Public Administration Review, 65, 655-668.
24. West, W. (2009). Inside the black box: The development of proposed rules and the limits of procedural controls. Administration and Society, 41(5), 576-599.
25. Yackee, S. W. (2008). The hidden politics of regulation: Interest group influence during agency rule development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
26. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.