Toward a scalable holographic word-form representation

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 602-615

  Cox, Gregory E ^a   Kachergis, George ^a   Recchia, Gabriel ^a   Jones, Michael N ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Holographic reduced representations; Lexical representation; Orthography; Word perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; HOLOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; HOLOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 80052844978     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0125-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
2. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The english lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459.
3. Borsellino, A., & Poggio, T. (1972). Holographic aspects of temporal memory and optomotor responses. Biological Cybernetics, 10, 58-60.
4. Bouma, H. (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research, 11, 459-474.
5. Burgess, C., & Livesay, K. (1998). The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 272-277.
6. Clark, J. J., & O'Regan, J. K. (1998). Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading. Vision Research, 39, 843-857.
7. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Benner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales.
9. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
10. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535-557.
11. Davis, C. J., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1550-1570.
12. Eliasmith, C. (2004). Learning context sensitive logical inference in a neurobiological simulation. In S. Levy & R. Gayler (Eds.), Compositional connectionism in cognitive science (pp. 17-20). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
13. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
14. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
15. Grainger, J., Granier, J., Farioli, F., van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884.
16. Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142.
17. Hannagan, T., Dandurand, F., & Grainger, J. (2011). Broken symmetries in a location-invariant word recognition network. Neural Computation, 23, 251-283.
18. Hannagan, T., Dupoux, E., & Christophe, A. (2011). Holographic string encoding. Cognitive Science, 35, 79-118.
19. Harris, H. D. (2002). Holographic reduced representations for oscillator recall: A model of phonological production. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 423-428). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Hinton, G. E. (1990). Mapping part-whole hierarchies into connectionist networks. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 47-76.
21. Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1 (pp. 77-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.
23. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
24. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1-37.
26. Jones, M. N., & Recchia, G. (2010). You can't wear a coat rack: A binding framework to avoid illusory feature migrations in perceptually grounded semantic models. In S. Ohisson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 877-882). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
27. Jordan, T. R., Thomas, S. M., Patching, G. R., & Scott-Brown, K. C. (2003). Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 883-893.
28. Kanerva, P. (1994). The spatter code for encoding concepts at many levels. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, vol. 1 (pp. 226-229). London: Springer.
29. Kwantes, P. J. (2005). Using context to build semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 703-710.
30. Le Cun, Y., & Bengio, Y. (1994). Word-level training of a handwritten word recognizer based on convolutional neural networks. In IEEE Conference on Pattern Recognition (Vol. 2, pp. 88-92). Jerusalem.
31. Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 21086-21090.
32. Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2009). Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 618-639.
33. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
34. Mewhort, D. J. K., & Johns, E. E. (1988). Some tests of the interactive-activation model for word identification. Psychological Research, 50, 135-147.
35. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
36. Otis, K., & Sagi, E. (2008). Phonaesthemes: A corpus-based analysis. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 65-70). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
37. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97-120). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
38. Plate, T. A. (1995). Holographic reduced representations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6, 623-641.
39. Plate, T. A. (2003). Holographic reduced representations. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
40. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
41. Smith, S. M., & Tindell, D. R. (1997). Memory blocks in word fragment completion caused by involuntary retrieval of orthographically related primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 355-370.
42. Townsend, J. T., Taylor, S. G., & Brown, D. R. (1971). Lateral masking for letters with unlimited viewing time. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 375-378.
43. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.