Bone graft substitutes in hip revision surgery: A comprehensive overview

Injury

Volumn 42, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2011, Pages

  Beswick, Andrew ^a   Blom, Ashley W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone graft; Bone substitute; Hip replacement; Osteoarthritis; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE;

BONE ALLOGRAFT; BONE GRAFT; CERAMICS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COST CONTROL; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HIP REVISION SURGERY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 80052844343     PISSN: 00201383     EISSN: 18790267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
2. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 7th Annual Report. Hemel Hempstead: NJR Centre; 2010.
3. T. Aulakh, N. Jayasekera, J. Kuiper, and J. Richardson Long-term clinical outcomes following the use of synthetic hydroxyapatite and bone graft in impaction in revision hip arthroplasty Biomaterials 30 2009 1732 1738
4. C.T. Begley, M. Jo Doherty, R.A.B. Mollan, and D.J. Wilson Comparative study of the osteoinductive properties of bioceramic, coral and processed bone graft substitutes Biomaterials 16 1995 1181 1185
5. W.H. Bell Resorption characteristics of bone and bone substitutes Oral Surg 17 1964 650 657
6. P. Bernstein, M. Bornhauser, K. Gunther, and M. Stiehler Bone tissue engineering in clinical application. Assessment of the current situation Orthopade 38 2009 1029 1037
7. A. Blom, B. Grimm, and A. Miles Subsidence in impaction grafting: the effect of adding a ceramic bone graft extender to bone Proc Inst Mech Eng H 216 2002 265 270 (Pubitemid 34873587)
8. A.W. Blom, J. Heal, and I.D. Learmonth Restoration of bone stock loss at revision total hip arthroplasty using allograft and bone substitutes Curr Orthop 16 2002 411 419 (Pubitemid 36285973)
9. A.W. Blom, V. Wylde, and C. Livesey Impaction bone grafting of the acetabulum at hip revision using a mix of bone chips and a biphasic porous ceramic bone graft substitute Acta Orthop 80 2009 150 154
10. K.J. Bozic, S.M. Kurtz, and E. Lau The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 2009 128 133
11. A.S. Brydone, D. Meek, and S. Maclaine Bone grafting, orthopaedic biomaterials, and the clinical need for bone engineering Proc Inst Mech Eng 224 2010 1329 1343
12. E.M. Carlisle Silicon: a possible factor in bone calcification Science 167 1970 279 280
13. C. Charalambides, M. Beer, and A.G. Cobb Poor results after augmenting autograft with xenograft (Surgibone) in hip revision surgery: a report of 27 cases Acta Orthop 76 2005 544 549 (Pubitemid 41232786)
14. R. Chidambaram, and A.G. Cobb Change in the age distribution of patients undergoing primary hip and knee replacements over 13 years - an increase in the number of younger men having hip surgery J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 2009 152
15. A.S. Coetzee Regeneration of bone in the presence of calcium sulfate Arch Otolaryngol 106 1980 405 409 (Pubitemid 10071622)
16. DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. National health statistics reports; no 5. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2008.
17. H. Egawa, H. Ho, and C. Huynh A three-dimensional method for evaluating changes in acetabular osteolytic lesions in response to treatment Clin Orthop Rel Res 468 2010 480 490
18. E. Engelbrecht, G. Von Foerster, and G. Delling Ionogran in revision arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 2000 192 199 (Pubitemid 30167073)
19. C.A. Engh, H. Egawa, and S.E. Beykirch The quality of osteolysis grafting with cementless acetabular component retention Clin Orthop Rel Res 2007 465
20. G.E. Friedlaender, D.M. Strong, W.W. Tomford, and H.J. Mankin Long-term follow-up of patients with osteochondral allografts. A correlation between immunologic responses and clinical outcome Orthop Clin North Am 30 1999 583 588 (Pubitemid 29471300)
21. T. Fujishiro, T. Nishikawa, and N. Takahiro Histologic analysis of allograft mixed with hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate used in revision femoral impaction bone grafting Orthopedics 2008 31
22. S.M. Graham, A. Leonidou, and N. Aslam-Pervez Biological therapy of bone defects: the immunology of bone allo-transplantation Expert Opin Biol Ther 10 2010 885 901
23. U. Heise, J.F. Osborn, and F. Duwe Hydroxyapatite ceramic as a bone substitute Int Orthop 14 1990 329 338 (Pubitemid 20372500)
24. G. Holt, A. Arthur, D. Frame, and A. Muirhead Human skeletal allograft collection - room for improvement? Scott Med J 49 2004 146 148 (Pubitemid 40074422)
25. J. Huang, S.M. Best, W. Bonfield, and T. Buckland Development and characterization of titanium-containing hydroxyapatite for medical applications Acta Biomater 6 2010 241 249
26. K. Kawanabe, H. Iida, and Y. Matsusue A-W glass ceramic as a bone substitute in cemented hip arthroplasty: 15 hips followed 2-10 years Acta Orthop Scand 69 1998 237 242 (Pubitemid 28369468)
27. S. Kurtz, E. Lau, and K. Ong Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: National projections from 2010 to 2030 Clin Orthop Rel Res 467 2009 2606 2612
28. S. Kurtz, F. Mowat, and K. Ong Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002 J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 2005 1487 1497 (Pubitemid 40917748)
29. S. Kurtz, K. Ong, and E. Lau Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 2007 780 785 (Pubitemid 46564282)
30. H.B. Leung, M.W. Fok, L.C. Chow, and C.H. Yen Cost comparison of femoral head banking versus bone substitutes J Orthopaedic Surg 18 2010 50 54
31. B. Levine, S. Sporer, and R. Poggie Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery Biomaterials 27 2006 4671 4681 (Pubitemid 43849977)
32. H. Malchau, P. Herberts, and T. Eisler The Swedish total hip replacement register J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 2002 S2 20 (Pubitemid 35168331)
33. I. McNamara Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery: past, present and future Cell Tissue Bank 11 2010 57 73
34. I. McNamara, S. Deshpande, and M. Porteous Impaction grafting of the acetabulum with a mixture of frozen, ground irradiated bone graft and porous synthetic bone substitute (Apapore 60) J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 2010 617 623
35. W.R. Moore, S.E. Graves, and G.I. Bain Synthetic bone graft substitutes ANZ J Surg 71 2001 354 361
36. M. Müller, and R. Stangl Norian SRS augmentation in revision of acetabular cup of total hip arthroplasty. A follow up of six patients Unfallchirurg 109 2006 335 338
37. C. Nich, P. Bizot, R. Nizard, and L. Sedel Femoral reconstruction with impacted macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic in revision hip arthroplasty Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur 92 2006 343 350 (Pubitemid 43900156)
38. C. Nich, and L. Sedel Bone substitution in revision hip replacement Int Orthop 30 2006 525 531 (Pubitemid 44900563)
39. T. Nishii, N. Sugano, and H. Miki Multidetector-CT evaluation of bone substitutes remodeling after revision hip surgery Clin Orthop Rel Res 2006 442
40. H. Oonishi, Y. Iwaki, and N. Kin Hydroxyapatite in revision of total hip replacements with massive acetabular defects: 4- to 10-year clinical results J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 1997 87 92
41. Overgaard S, Pedersen A, Havelin L, et al. The prognosis of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients younger than 50 years of age. Results of 14,610 primary THA. EFORT. Madrid; 2010.
42. N. Patel, R.A. Brooks, and M.T. Clarke In vivo assessment of hydroxyapatite and silicate-substituted hydroxyapatite granules using an ovine defect model J Mater Sci 16 2005 429 440 (Pubitemid 41217424)
43. D.M. Reffitt, N. Ogston, and R. Jugdaohsingh Orthosilicic acid stimulates collagen type 1 synthesis and osteoblastic differentiation in human osteoblast-like cells in vitro Bone 32 2003 127 135 (Pubitemid 36299140)
44. C. Schwartz, and R. Bordei Biphasic phospho-calcium ceramics used as bone substitutes are efficient in the management of severe acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasties Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 15 2005 191 196 (Pubitemid 41414409)
45. C. Schwartz, P. Liss, and B. Jacquemaire Biphasic synthetic bone substitute use in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: Clinical, radiological and histological results J Mater Sci 10 1999 821 825 (Pubitemid 30064208)
46. K. Shibuya, H. Kurosawa, H. Takeuchi, and S. Niwa The medium-term results of treatment with hydroxyapatite implants J Biomed Mater Res A 75 2005 405 413 (Pubitemid 41609563)
47. B.D. Springer, T.K. Fehring, and W.L. Griffin Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails Clin Orthop Rel Res 467 2009 166 173
48. D.F. Stroup, J.A. Berlin, and S.C. Morton Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting JAMA 283 2000 2008 2012 (Pubitemid 30214957)
49. R. Wasielewski, K. Sheridan, and M. Lubbers Coralline hydroxyapatite in complex acetabular reconstruction Orthopedics 2008 31
50. M. Whitehouse, and A. Blom The use of ceramics as bone substitutes in revision hip arthroplasty Materials 2 2009 1895 1907