Multidetector-CT evaluation of bone substitutes remodeling after revision hip surgery

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 442, Issue , 2006, Pages 158-164

  Nishii, Takashi ^a   Sugano, Nobuhiko ^a   Miki, Hidenobu ^a   Koyama, Tsuyoshi ^a   Yoshikawa, Hideki ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BETA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE;

ABSORPTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BONE DEFECT; BONE GRAFT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OSSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DRUG EFFECT; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE REMODELING; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33645093987     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000183740.88987.5f     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bauer TW, Smith ST. Bioactive materials in orthopaedic surgery: Overview and regulatory considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;395:11-22.
2. Berland LL, Smith JK. Multidetector-array CT: Once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology. 1998;209:327-329.
3. Berman AT, Reid JS, Yanicko Jr DR, et al. Thermally induced bone necrosis in rabbits: Relation to implant failure in humans. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:284-292.
4. Böhm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: Evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83A:1023-1031.
5. Cook SD, Barrack RL, Patron LP, Salkeld SL. Osteoinductive agents in reconstructive hip surgery: A look forward. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:195-202.
6. Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE, et al. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:214-220.
7. Finkemeier CG. Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84A:454-464.
8. Flatley TJ, Lynch KL, Benson M. Tissue response to implants of calcium phosphate ceramic in the rabbit spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;179:246-252.
9. Gamradt SC, Lieberman JR. Bone graft for revision hip arthroplasty: Biology and future applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:183-194.
10. Greis PE, Kang JD, Silvaggio V, Rubash HE. A long-term study on defect filling and bone ingrowth using a canine fiber metal total hip model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:47-59.
11. Grünig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE. Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;16:187-197.
12. Heekin RD, Engh CA, Vinh T. Morselized allograft in acetabular reconstruction: A postmortem retrieval analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:184-190.
13. Hollinger JO, Brekke J, Gruskin E, Lee D. Role of bone substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:55-65.
14. Hooten Jr JP, Engh CA, Heekin RD, Vinh TN. Structural bulk allografts in acetabular reconstruction: Analysis of two grafts retrieved at post-mortem. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78B:270-275.
15. Hultmark P, Kärrholm J, Strömberg C, et al. Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component: Prospective 7 to 13 years' follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:551-561.
16. Kurashina K, Kurita H, Kotani A, et al. In vivo study of a calcium phosphate cement consisting of alpha-tricalcium phosphate/dicalcium phosphate dibasic/tetracalcium phosphate monoxide. Biomaterials. 1997;18:147-151.
17. Mazhar Tokgözoǧlu A, Aydin M, Atilla B, Caner B. Scintigraphic evaluation of impaction grafting for total hip arthroplasty revision. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:416-419.
18. Metsger DS, Driskell TD, Paulsrud JR. Tricalcium phosphate ceramic: A resorbable bone implant. Review and current status. J Am Dent Assoc. 1982;105:1035-1038.
19. Ogose A, Hotta T, Hatano H, et al. Histological examination of beta-tricalcium phosphate graft in human femur. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:601-604.
20. Ozawa M. Experimental study of bone conductivity and absorbability of the pure β-TCP. J Jpn Soc Biomater. 1995;13:167-175.
21. Ozonek W, Rapala K, Obrebski M. The application of allogenic bone grafts for replantation of a hip prosthesis: An attempt at radiological evaluation of graft rebuilding. Ann Transplant. 1999;4:52-58.
22. Paprosky WG, Lawrence J, Cameron H. Femoral defect classification: Clinical application. Orthop Rev. 1990;19(Suppl):9-15.
23. 18F]fluoride ion positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:615-624.
24. Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH, et al. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84A:609-614.
25. Schwarz EM, Campbell D, Totterman S, et al. Use of volumetric computerized tomography as a primary outcome measure to evaluate drug efficacy in the prevention of peri-prosthetic osteolysis: A 1-year clinical pilot of etanercept vs. placebo. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:1049-1055.
26. Stamenkov R, Howie D, Taylor J, et al. Measurement of bone defects adjacent to acetabular components of hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;412:117-124.
27. Stevenson S, Emery SE, Goldberg VM. Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:66-74.
28. Weber M, Hempfing A, Orler R, Ganz R. Femoral revision using the Wagner stem: Results at 2-9 years. Int Orthop. 2002;26:36-39.
29. Won YY, Dorr LD, Bloebaum R, Wan Z. Assessment of bone graft substitutes in autopsy implant retrievals of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:116-122.
30. Yoon ST, Boden SD. Osteoinductive molecules in orthopaedics: Basic science and preclinical studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;395:33-43.