Bayesian analysis of an international ELISA comparability study

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1459-1468

  Klauenberg, Katy ^a   Ebert, Bernd ^a   Voigt, Jan ^a   Walzel, Monika ^a   Noble, James E ^b   Knight, Alex E ^b   Elster, Clemens ^a  

^a PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; CCQM; Fluorescent ELISA; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CYTOKINE;

ANTIGEN BINDING; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FLUORESCENCE; IMMUNOASSAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNCERTAINTY;

BAYES THEOREM; CALIBRATION; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; INTERNATIONALITY; REFERENCE STANDARDS; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 80052842604     PISSN: 14346621     EISSN: 14374331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.648     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Wild D, editor. The immunoassay handbook, 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.
2. Hayashi Y, Matsuda R, Maitani T, Ito K, Nishimura W, Imai K, et al. An expression of within-plate uncertainty in sandwich ELISA. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2004;36:225-9.
3. Hayashi Y, Matsuda R, Maitani T, Imai K, Nishimura W, Ito K, et al. Precision, limit of detection and range of quantitation in competitive ELISA. Anal Chem 2004;76:1295-301. (Pubitemid 38280476)
4. Choi DH, Katakura Y, Matsuda R, Hayashi Y, Hirobe M, Goda Y, et al. Validation of a method for predicting the precision, limit of detection and range of quantitation in competitive ELISA. Anal Sci 2007;23:215-8.
5. Noble JE, Wang L, Cerasoli E, Knight AE, Porter RA, Gray E, et al. An international comparability study to determine the sources of uncertainty associated with a non-competitive sandwich fluorescent ELISA. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1033-45. (Pubitemid 352000487)
6. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, et al. ISO/IEC Guide 99-12:2007, International Vocabulary of Metrology - Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms, VIM. 3rd ed. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, JCGM 2008;200:2008. Available from: http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM-200-2008.pdf wcited 8 December 2010x.
7. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by National Metrology Institutes; 1999.
8. Gelman A, Chew G, Shnaidman M. Bayesian analysis of serial dilution assays. Biometrics 2004;60:407-17. (Pubitemid 38780200)
9. Voigt J, Ebert B, Hoffman A, Macdonald R. Validierung eines 'Fluorescent Enzyme Linked Immuno Sandwich Assay' (ELISA). PTB-Mitteilungen 2008;118:255-60.
10. Bernardo JM. Bayesian statistics. In: Viertl R, editor. Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). Probability and statistics. Oxford: EOLSS Publishers, Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO; 2003. Available from: http://www.eolss.net.
11. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, editors. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, 1st ed. London: Chapman Hall CRC, 1996.
12. Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 2000;10:325-37.
13. Findlay JW, Smith WC, Lee JW, Nordblom GD, Das I, DeSilva BS, et al. Validation of immunoassays for bioanalysis: a pharmaceutical industry perspective. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2000; 21:1249-73. (Pubitemid 30001554)
14. IUPAC, Compiled by, McNaught AD, Wilkinson A. In: Compendium bof chemical terminology (the ''Gold Book''), 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1997. XML on-line corrected version: http://goldbook.iupac.org (2006-) created by M. Nic, J. Jirat, B. Kosata, updates compiled by A. Jenkins.
15. Berger J. The robust Bayesian viewpoint (with discussion). In: Kadane JB, editor. Robustness of Bayesian analyses. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984:63-144.
16. Hoeting JA, Madigan D, Raftery AE, Volinsky CT. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat Sci 1999;14:382-417.
17. Dixon WJ. Analysis of extreme values. Ann Math Statist 1950;21:488-506.
18. Kass RE, Wasserman L. The selection of prior distributions by formal rules. J Am Stat Assoc 1996;91:1343-70.
19. Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D. WinBUGS User Manual, Version 1.4; 2003. Available from: http://www.mrcbsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs.