How Well Did It Work? Measuring Organizational Performance in Simulation Environments

Organizational Simulation

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 253-272

  MacMillan, Jean ^a   Diedrich, Frederick J ^a   Entin, Elliot E ^a   Serfaty, Daniel ^a  

^a APTIMA INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication behavior; Constructive simulations; Empirical data collection; Network connectivity; Organizational performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052840766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0471739448.ch9     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Alberts, D.S. & Hayes, R.E. (2003). Power to the Edge: Command and Control in the Information Age. Washington. DC: Command and Control Research Program Publication Series.
2. Cebrowski, A.K. (2003). Transforming Defense: The Path Not Taken...Yet, http://www.t2net.org/briefs/dakc/ArthurKCebrowskiv2.ppt
3. Diedrich, F.J., Entin, E.E., Hutchins, S.G., Hocevar, S.P., Rubineau, B. & MacMillan, J. (2003). When do organizations need to change? (Part I) Coping with incongruence. Proceedings of the 2003 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. National Defense University, Washington, DC.
4. Entin, E. E. (1999). Optimized command and control architectures for improved process and performance. Proceedings of the 1999 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Newport, RI.
5. Entin, E. E., Diedrich, F. J., and Rubineau, B. (2003). Adaptive communication patterns in different organizational structures. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting. Denver, CO.
6. Entin, E.E. and Serfaty, D. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors. 41, 312-325.
7. Hart, S. G. & Staveland, L. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Mishkati (Eds.). Human Mental Workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. st SIOP Convention, Atlanta, GA.
9. Hulin, C.L. & Ilgen, D.R. (2000). Introduction to computational modeling in organizations: The good that modeling does. In D.R. Ilgen & C.L. Hulin (Eds.) Computational Modeling of Behavior in Organizations: The Third Scientific Discipline. Washington, DC. American Psychological Association.
10. Klein, G., P.J. Feltovich, J.M. Bradshaw, & D.D. Woods (2005). Common Ground and Coordination in Joint Activity. In W.B. Rouse & K.R. Boff, Eds., Organizational Simulation: From Modeling and Simulation to Games and Entertainment. New York: Wiley.
11. Kleinman, D.L., Levchuk, G.M., Hutchins, S.G. & Kemple, W.G. (2003). Scenario design for the empirical testing of organizational congruence. Proceedings of the 2003 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. National Defense University, Washington, DC.
12. Levchuk, G.M., Kleinman, D.L., Ruan, S., & Pattipati, K.R. (2003). Congruence of human organizations: Theory versus data. In Proceedings of the 2003 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. National Defense University, Washington, DC.
13. Levchuk, Y., Luo, J., Levchuk, G. M., Pattipati, C., & Kleinman, D. (1999). A multi-functional software environment for modeling complex missions and devising adaptive organizations. Proceedings of the 1999 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Naval War College, Newport, RI.
14. Levchuk, Y., Pattipati, C., & Kleinman, D. (1998). Designing adaptive organizations to process a complex mission: Algorithms and applications. Proceedings of the 1998 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
15. Levchuk, Y., Pattipati, C., & Kleinman, D. (1999). Analytic model driven organizational design and experimentation in adaptive command and control. Proceedings of the 1999 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Naval War College, Newport, RI.
16. MacMillan, J., Paley, M.J., Levchuk, Y.N., Entin, E.E., Serfaty, D., & Freeman, J.T. (2002). Designing the best team for the task: Optimal organizational structures for military missions. In M. McNeese, E. Salas, & M. Endsley (Eds.), New Trends in Cooperative Activities: System Dynamics in Complex Settings. San Diego, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Press.
17. MacMillan, J., Entin, E.E., & Serfaty, D. (2004). Communication Overhead: The Hidden Cost of Team Cognition. In E. Salas & S.M. Fiore (Eds.), Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Miller, D., Price, J.M., Entin, E.E., Rubineau, B., & Elliott, L. (2001). Does planning using groupware foster coordinated team performance? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting. Minneapolis, MN.
19. Moon, H., Hollenbeck, J., Ilgen, D., West, B., Ellis, A., Humphrey, S. & Porter, A (2000). Asymmetry in structure movement: Challenges on the road to adaptive organization structures. Proceedings of the 2000 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
20. Price, J. M., Miller, D. L., Entin, E.E., & Rubineau, B. (2001). Collaborative planning and coordinated team performance. Proceedings of the 2001 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD.
21. Rouse, W.B. (2005). Strategic Thinking Via Organizational Simulation. In W.B. Rouse & K.R. Boff, Eds., Organizational Simulation: From Modeling and Simulation to Games and Entertainment. New York: Wiley.
22. Rouse, W.B. & K.R. Boff (2005). Introduction and Overview. In W.B. Rouse & K.R. Boff, Eds., Organizational Simulation: From Modeling and Simulation to Games and Entertainment. New York: Wiley.
23. Salas, E., J.W. Guthrie, Jr., K.A. Wilson-Donnelly, H.A. Priest & S. Burke (2005). Modeling Team Performance: The Basic Ingredients and Research Needs. In W.B. Rouse & K.R. Boff, Eds., Organizational Simulation: From Modeling and Simulation to Games and Entertainment. New York: Wiley.