Grammaticalisation: Cause or effect?

Motives for Language Change

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 99-123

  Lightfoot, David ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052840386     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Barbour, Julian. 2000. The end of time. Oxford University Press.
2. Bauer, Brigitte. 1995. The emergence and development of SVO patterning in Latin and French. Oxford University Press.
3. Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.
4. Bruyn, Adrienne. 1995. Grammaticalization in creoles: the development of determiners and relative clauses in Sranan. Studies in Language and Language Use 21. Dordrecht: ICG Printing.
5. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
6. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Darwin, Charles. 1874. The descent of man. [2nd edn, 1889] New York: D. Appleton.
8. Dresher, Elan andWilliam Idsardi. 1999. ‘Prerequisites for a theory of diachronic adaptation’, Zeitschrift f¨ur Sprachwissenschaft 18.1: 212–5.
9. Fischer, Olga C. M. 1997. ‘On the status of grammaticalization and the diachronic dimension in explanation’, Transactions of the Philological Society 95.2: 149–87.
10. Van Gelderen, Elly. 1997. Verbal agreement and the grammar behind its ‘breakdown’: minimalist feature checking. T¨ubingen: Max Niemeyer.
11. Haspelmath, Martin. 1999a. ‘Are there principles of grammatical change?’ Journal of Linguistics 35.3: 579–96.
12. Haspelmath, Martin. 1999b. ‘Optimality and diachronic adaptation’, Zeitschrift f¨ur Sprachwissenschaft 18: 180–205.
13. Haspelmath, Martin. 1999c. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37.6: 1043–68.
14. Hopper, Paul and Elizabeth Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
15. Janda, Richard D. 2001. ‘Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality”: on the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization.’ Language Sciences 23. 2-3: 265–340.
16. Joseph, Brian. 2001. ‘Is there such a thing as grammaticalization?’, Language Sciences 23. 2-3: 163–86.
17. Kiparsky, Paul. 1996. ‘The shift to head-initial VP in Germanic’, in H. Thrainsson, S. Epstein and S. Peters (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 140–79.
18. Lakoff, Robin T. 1972. ‘Another look at drift’, in Robert P. Stockwell and Ron Macauley (eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 172–98.
19. Lasnik, Howard. 1999. Minimalist analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Lass, Roger. 1980. On explaining linguistic change. Cambridge University Press.
21. Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge University Press.
22. Lightfoot, David W. 1991. How to set parameters: arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Lightfoot, DavidW. 1993. ‘WhyUGneeds a learning theory: triggering verbmovement’, in Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London:
24. Lightfoot, David W. 1999. The development of language: acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Paul, Hermann. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. [1970] Niemeyer: T¨ubingen.
27. Rask, Rasmus. 1818. Undersøgelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprindelse. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandlings Forlag.
28. Roberts, Ian G. 1993. ‘A formal account of grammaticalization in the history of Romance futures’, Folia Linguistica Historica 13: 219–58.
29. Ross, John R. 1969. ‘Auxiliaries as main verbs’, inW. Todd (ed.), Studies in philosophical linguistics, series I. Evanston: Great Expectations.
30. Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt.
31. Sapir, Edward. 1929. ‘The status of linguistics as a science’, Language 5: 207–14.
32. Schleicher, August. 1848 Uber die Bedeutung der Sprache fu¨r die Naturgeschichte des Menschen. Weimar: Hermann B¨ohlau.
33. Schleicher, August. 1861-2. Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann B¨ohlau.
34. Schleicher, August. 1863. Die darwinische Theorie und die Spachwissenschaft. Weimar: Hermann B¨ohlau.
35. Vennemann, Theo. 1975. ‘An explanation of drift’, in C. N. Li (ed.), Word order and word order change. Austin: University of Texas Press, 269–305.
36. Warner, Anthony R. 1995. ‘Predicting the progressive passive: parametric change within a lexicalist framework’, Language 71.3: 533–57.
37. Warner, Anthony R. 1997. ‘The structure of parametric change, and V movement in the history of English’, in Ans van Kemenade and Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge University Press, 380–93.
38. Watkins, Calvert. 1976. ‘Toward Proto-Indo-European syntax: problems and pseudoproblems’, in S. Steever, C. Walker and S. Mufwene (eds.), Diachronic syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society, 305–26.