Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease has no advantages over open approach: Midterm results of a randomized controlled trial

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Volumn 396, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 973-980

  Raue, Wieland ^a   Paolucci, V ^b   Asperger, W ^c   Albrecht, R ^d   Buchler M W ^e   Schwenk, W ^f  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Ketteler Krankenhaus Offenbach   (Germany)

^c Department of General and Visceral Surgery   (Germany)

^d HELIOS Klinikum Aue   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^f ASKLEPIOS KLINIK ALTONA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Diverticulitis; Laparoscopy; Quality of life; RCT; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ABSCESS; ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANASTOMOSIS STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COLON RESECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION DISORDER; DIVERTICULOSIS; FEMALE; HEART DISEASE; HERNIA; HUMAN; ILEUS; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DISEASE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIPLE ORGAN FAILURE; OPEN SIGMOID RESECTION; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEPSIS; SIGMOID; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE ADHESION; URETER DISEASE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIVERTICULITIS, COLONIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; REOPERATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SIGMOID DISEASES; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80052826340     PISSN: 14352443     EISSN: 14352451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-011-0825-4     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. E Barlehner B Heukrodt R Schwetling 1998 Laparoscopic surgery of sigmoid diverticulitis Zentralbl Chir 123 Suppl 13 16 9586165 (Pubitemid 28179814)
2. WD Wong SD Wexner A Lowry A Vernava III M Burnstein F Denstman V Fazio B Kerner R Moore G Oliver W Peters T Ross P Senatore C Simmang 2000 Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis-supporting documentation. The Standards Task Force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Dis Colon Rectum 43 290 297 10733108 10.1007/BF02258291 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c7psFantA%3D%3D
3. JL Oomen AF Engel MA Cuesta 2006 Outcome of elective primary surgery for diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon: a risk analysis based on the POSSUM scoring system Colorectal Dis 8 91 97 16412067 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00867.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FisFKruw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43372455)
4. CG Schmedt R Bittner M Schroter M Ulrich B Leibl 2000 Surgical therapy of colonic diverticulitis-how reliable is primary anastomosis? Chirurg 71 202 208 10734590 10.1007/s001040051038 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7pvVOltw%3D%3D
5. A Dwivedi F Chahin S Agrawal WY Chau A Tootla F Tootla YJ Silva 2002 Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease Dis Colon Rectum 45 1309 1314 12394427 10.1007/s10350-004-6415-6 (Pubitemid 35176040)
6. OM Jones AR Stevenson D Clark RW Stitz JW Lumley 2008 Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 500 consecutive patients Ann Surg 248 1092 1097 19092355 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181884923
7. F Kockerling C Schneider MA Reymond H Scheidbach H Scheuerlein J Konradt HP Bruch C Zornig L Kohler E Barlehner A Kuthe G Szinicz HA Richter W Hohenberger 1999 Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group Surg Endosc 13 567 571 10347292 10.1007/s004649901042 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3nvVGgug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29277225)
8. BR Klarenbeek AA Veenhof R Bergamaschi DL van der Peet WT van den Broek ES de Lange WA Bemelman P Heres AM Lacy AF Engel MA Cuesta 2009 Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomized control trial: short-term results of the Sigma Trial Ann Surg 249 39 44 19106674 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e416a
9. P Gervaz I Inan T Perneger E Schiffer P Morel 2010 A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis Ann Surg 252 3 8 20505508 10.1097/SLA. 0b013e3181dbb5a5
10. O Hansen W Stock 1999 Prophylaktische Operation bei der Divertikelkrankheit des Kolons-Stufenkonzept durch exakte Stadieneinteilung Langenbecks Arch Surg (Suppl II) 1257 1260
11. WA Bemelman J Ringers DW Meijer CW de Wit JJ Bannenberg 1996 Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with the dexterity pneumo sleeve Dis Colon Rectum 39 S59 S61 8831548 10.1007/BF02053807 1:STN:280:DyaK28vivVCntw%3D%3D
12. A Alves Y Panis K Slim B Heyd F Kwiatkowski G Mantion 2005 French multicentre prospective observational study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease Br J Surg 92 1520 1525 16231279 10.1002/bjs.5148 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2Mnjslymug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 41785291)
13. U Guller N Jain S Hervey H Purves R Pietrobon 2003 Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases Arch Surg 138 1179 1186 14609864 10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1179 (Pubitemid 37392390)
14. S Purkayastha VA Constantinides PP Tekkis T Athanasiou O Aziz H Tilney AW Darzi AG Heriot 2006 Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies Dis Colon Rectum 49 446 463 16534656 10.1007/s10350-005-0316-1
15. H Scheidbach C Schneider J Rose J Konradt E Gross E Bärlehner M Pross U Schmidt F Köckerling H Lippert 2004 Laparoscopic approach to treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective multicenter study on 1,545 patients Dis Colon Rectum 47 1883 1888 15622581 10.1007/s10350-004-0715-8 (Pubitemid 40064432)
16. A Senagore 2005 Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease Surg Clin N Am 85 19 24 15619525 10.1016/j.suc.2004.09.007 (Pubitemid 43073010)
17. BR Klarenbeek R Bergamaschi AA Veenhof DL van der Peet WT van den Broek ES de Lange WA Bemelman P Heres AM Lacy MA Cuesta 2011 Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: follow-up assessment of the randomized control Sigma trial Surg Endosc 25 1121 1126 20872022 10.1007/s00464-010-1327-0
18. L Basse DH Jakobsen L Bardram P Billesbolle C Lund T Mogensen J Rosenberg H Kehlet 2005 Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study Ann Surg 241 416 423 15729063 10.1097/01.sla.0000154149.85506.36 (Pubitemid 40299717)
19. PM King JM Blazeby P Ewings PJ Franks RJ Longman AH Kendrick RM Kipling RH Kennedy 2006 Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme Br J Surg 93 300 308 16363014 10.1002/bjs.5216 1:STN:280:DC%2BD287ivVGrsw%3D%3D
20. E Kuhry WF Schwenk R Gaupset U Romild HJ Bonjer 2008 Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2) CD003432
21. W Schwenk O Haase J Neudecker JM Muller 2005 Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3) CD003145
22. W Schwenk O Haase N Gunther J Neudecker 2007 Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials comparing short-term results of laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection Int J Colorectal Dis 22 1369 1376 17530263 10.1007/s00384-007-0318-7 (Pubitemid 47456723)
23. Scarpa M, Griggio L, Rampado S, Ruffolo C, Citton M, Pozza A, Borsetto L, Dall'olmo L, Angriman I (2011) Long-term health-related quality of life after minimally invasive surgery for diverticular disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0749-z:
24. AM McDonald RC Knight MK Campbell VA Entwistle AM Grant JA Cook DR Elbourne D Francis J Garcia I Roberts C Snowdon 2006 What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies Trials 7 9 16603070 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9 (Pubitemid 43862982)
25. PW Plaisier MY Berger RL van der Hul HG Nijs R den Toom OT Terpstra HA Bruining 1994 Unexpected difficulties in randomizing patients in a surgical trial: a prospective study comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with open cholecystectomy World J Surg 18 769 772 7975698 10.1007/BF00298927 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2Fms1WltA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24304658)
26. RJ Prescott CE Counsell WJ Gillespie AM Grant IT Russell S Kiauka IR Colthart S Ross SM Shepherd D Russell 1999 Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials Health Technol Assess 3 1 143 10683591 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7kvFartg%3D%3D
27. S Ross A Grant C Counsell W Gillespie I Russell R Prescott 1999 Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review J Clin Epidemiol 52 1143 1156 10580777 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00141-9 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fks1Ontg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29535414)
28. M Braga M Frasson A Vignali W Zuliani V Di Carlo 2007 Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial Ann Surg 246 1010 1014 18043103 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c4065
29. G Mackay U Ihedioha A McConnachie M Serpell RG Molloy PJ O'Dwyer 2007 Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery Colorectal Dis 9 368 372 17432992 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01123.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3isFCrsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 46563471)
30. MS Vlug J Wind E van der Zaag DT Ubbink HA Cense WA Bemelman 2009 Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme Colorectal Dis 11 335 343 18727715 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008. 01679.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzitFyitQ%3D%3D
31. J Wind SW Polle PH Fung Kon Jin CH Dejong MF von Meyenfeldt DT Ubbink DJ Gouma WA Bemelman 2006 Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery Br J Surg 93 800 809 16775831 10.1002/bjs.5384 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28znsVKhsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44035251)
32. J Wind J Hofland B Preckel MW Hollmann PM Bossuyt DJ Gouma MI van Berge Henegouwen JW Fuhring CH Dejong RM van Dam MA Cuesta A Noordhuis D de Jong E van Zalingen AF Engel TH Goei IE de Stoppelaar WF van Tets BA van Wagensveld A Swart MJ van den Elsen MF Gerhards LT de Wit MA Siepel AA van Geloven JW Juttmann W Clevers WA Bemelman 2006 Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial) BMC Surg 6 16 17134506 10.1186/1471-2482-6-16 (Pubitemid 44915987)
33. W Schwenk J Neudecker O Haase W Raue T Strohm JM Muller 2004 Comparison of EORTC quality of life core questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection Int J Colorectal Dis 19 554 560 15205989 10.1007/s00384-004-0609-1 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crhtVeitA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39445411)
34. H Dowson A Cowie K Ballard H Gage T Rockall 2008 Systematic review of quality of life following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery Colorectal Dis 10 757 768 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01603.x
35. OM Fredheim PC Borchgrevink T Saltnes S Kaasa 2007 Validation and comparison of the health-related quality-of-life instruments EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36 in assessment of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain J Pain Symptom Manage 34 657 665 17618079 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.011 (Pubitemid 350167512)