IPv4/IPv6 performance analysis: Transport layer protocol impact to transmission time

2011 International Conference on Internet Technology and Applications, iTAP 2011 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Švec, Peter ^a   Munk, Michal ^a  

^a Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra ^*  (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Forward stepwise regression; IPv6; Measurement methodology; Transport layer protocols

Indexed keywords

DEPARTURE TIME; HIGHER EFFICIENCY; IPV4/IPV6; IPV6; MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY; NETWORK ROUTERS; NEW PROTOCOL; PACKET SIZE; PACKET TRANSFER; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; RANDOM VALUES; STEPWISE REGRESSION; STEPWISE REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC MEASUREMENTS; TRANSMISSION TIME; TRANSPORT LAYER PROTOCOLS;

COMPUTER AIDED NETWORK ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA TRANSFER; EFFICIENCY; EXPERIMENTS; INTERNET; NETWORK PERFORMANCE; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROUTERS; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

COMPUTER NETWORK PERFORMANCE EVALUATION;

EID: 80052825638     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ITAP.2011.6006335     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. Postel, Ed., Transmission Control Protocol. 1981
2. J. Postel. (1980, User Datagram Protocol. Available: http://www.faqs.org/ rfcs/rfc768.html
3. A. Jungmaier. (2003). Stream Control Transmission Protocol for Beginners. Available: http://tdrwww.exp-math.uni-essen.de/inhalt/forschung/sctp-fb/sctp- intro.html
4. R. Stewart and P. D. Amer. (2007, Why is SCTP needed given TCP and UDP are widely available? Internet Society Member Briefing. Available: http://www.isoc.org/briefings/017/
5. S. Zeadally and I. Raicu, "Evaluating IPv6 on Windows and Solaris," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 7, pp. 51-57, 2003.
6. S. Mohamed, et al., "Performance Comparison of Packet Transmission over IPv6 Network on Different Platforms.," IEE, vol. 153, pp. 425-433, 2006.
7. S. S. Mohamed, et al., "Evaluation of IPv6 and comparative study with different operating systems," in Information Technology and Applications, 2005. ICITA 2005. Third International Conference on, 2005, pp. 665-670 vol.2.
8. E. Gamess and N. Morales, "Implementing IPv6 at Central University of Venezuela," presented at the Proceedings of the 4th international IFIP/ACM Latin American conference on Networking, San Jose, Costa Rica, 2007.
9. E. Gamess and R. Suros, "An upper bound model for TCP and UDP throughput in IPv4 and IPv6," J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 31, pp. 585-602, 2008.
10. S. Narayan and S. Tauch, "Network performance evaluation of IPv4-v6 configured tunnel and 6to4 transition mechanisms on windows server operating systems," in Computer Design and Applications (ICCDA), 2010 International Conference on, 2010, pp. V5-435-V5-440.
11. E. Chen, et al., "Analysis of IPv6 Network Communication Using Simulation," in Research and Development, 2006. SCOReD 2006., 2006, pp. 11-15.
12. P. Švec, "IPv6 in Slovak Academic Network," in IADIS Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems 2007, Lisabon, 2007, pp. 120-123.
13. L. Yuk-Nam, et al., "Empirical Performance of IPv6 vs. IPv4 under a Dual-Stack Environment," in Communications, 2008. ICC '08. IEEE International Conference on, 2008, pp. 5924-5929.
14. R. Yasinovskyy, et al., "A comparison of VoIP performance on IPv6 and IPv4 networks," in Computer Systems and Applications, 2009. AICCSA 2009. IEEE/ACS International Conference on, 2009, pp. 603-609.
15. M. N. Ismail and Z. Z. Abidin, "Implementing of IPv6 Protocol Environment at University of Kuala Lumpur: Measurement of IPv6 and IPv4 Performance," in Future Computer and Communication, 2009. ICFCC 2009. International Conference on, 2009, pp. 443-449.
16. S. Avallone, et al., "High Performance Internet Traffic Generators," J. Supercomput., vol. 35, pp. 5-26, 2006.