An upper bound model for TCP and UDP throughput in IPv4 and IPv6

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 585-602

  Gamess, Eric ^a   Surós, Rina ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Benchmarks; Ethernet; IPv4; IPv6; Performance evaluation; TCP throughput; UDP throughput

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ETHERNET; EXPERIMENTS; INTERNET; KETONES; LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; TECHNOLOGY; THROUGHPUT; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL; WATER WELL PUMPS;

(OTDR) TECHNOLOGY; 100 MBPS; ALL OVER THE WORLD; ELSEVIER (CO); END-USER APPLICATIONS; ETHERNET TECHNOLOGIES; EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS; MAXIMUM THROUGH PUT; OPERATING SYSTEMS (OS); POINT-TO-POINT CONNECTIONS; SOLARIS (CO); UPPER BOUNDS; WINDOWS XP SP2;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 47949106113     PISSN: 10848045     EISSN: 10958592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2007.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Blanchet M. Migrating to IPv6: a practical guide to implementing IPv6 in mobile and fixed networks. 1st ed. (2006), Wiley
2. Bradner S. Benchmarking terminology for network interconnection devices. RFC 1242, July 1991.
3. Bradner S, McQuaid J. Benchmarking methodology for network interconnect devices. RFC 2544, March 1999.
4. Carpenter B, Moore K. Connection of IPv6 domains via IPv4 Clouds. RFC 3056, February 2001.
5. Davies J. Understanding IPv6. 1st ed. (2002), Microsoft Press
6. Deering S, Hinden R. Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification. RFC 2460, December 1998.
7. Ettikan K. IPv6 dual stack transition technique performance analysis: KAME on FreeBSD as the case. Technical report. Faculty of Information Technology, Multimedia University, Jalan Multimedia; October 2000.
8. Ettikan K, Gopi K, Takefumi Y. Application performance analysis in transition mechanism from IPv4 to IPv6. IWS2000, Japan; February 2000.
9. Huitema C. Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through Network Address Translations (NATs), RFC 4380, February 2006.
10. Mohamed S., Buhari M., and Saleem H. Performance comparison of packet transmission over IPv6 network on different platforms. IEE Proc Commun 153 3 (2006) 425-433
11. Nordmark E, Gilligan R. Basic transition mechanisms for IPv6 hosts and routers. RFC 4213, October 2005.
12. Popoviciu C., Levy-Abegnoli E., and Grossetete P. Deploying IPv6 networks. 1st ed. (2006), Cisco Press
13. Postel J. User datagram protocol. RFC 768, August 1980.
14. Postel J. Internet protocol. RFC 791, September 1981a.
15. Postel J. Transmission control protocol. STD 7, RFC 793, September 1981b.
16. Shiau W., Li Y., Chao H., and Hsu P. Evaluating IPv6 on a large-scale network. Comput Commun 29 16 (2006) 3113-3121
17. Srisuresh P, Egevang K. Traditional IP network address translator (traditional NAT). RFC 3022, January 2001.
18. Stevens R, Fenner B, Rudoff A. Unix network programming: the sockets networking API. Addison-Wesley Professional, 3rd ed., October 2003.
19. Zeadally S., and Raicu I. Evaluating IPv6 on windows and solaris. IEEE Internet Comput 7 3 (2003) 51-57
20. Zeadally S., Wasseem R., and Raicu I. Comparison of end-system IPv6 protocol stacks. IEEE Proc Commun 151 3 (2004) 238-242