Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using 5% benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin versus 2.5% benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin topical treatments in acne

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Seidler, Elizabeth M ^a   Kimball, Alexa B ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENZOYL PEROXIDE PLUS CLINDAMYCIN;

ACNE; DRUG DOSE COMPARISON; DRUG EFFICACY; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; LETTER; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 80052801534     PISSN: 01909622     EISSN: 10976787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. M.A. Kinney, B.A. Yentzer, A.B. Fleischer Jr., and S.R. Feldman Trends in the treatment of acne vulgaris: are measures being taken to avoid antimicrobial resistance? J Drugs Dermatol 9 2010 519 524
2. J.M. Jackson, J.J. Fu, and J.L. Almekinder A randomized, investigator-blinded trial to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of a benzoyl peroxide 5%/ clindamycin phosphate 1% gel compared with a clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/tretinoin 0.025% gel in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris J Drugs Dermatol 9 2010 131 136
3. E.M. Seidler, and A.B. Kimball Meta-analysis comparing efficacy of benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, benzoyl peroxide with salicylic acid, and combination benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin in acne J Am Acad Dermatol 63 2010 52 62