Effect of the pay-for-performance program for breast cancer care in Taiwan

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2011, Pages

  Kuo, Raymond N C ^a   Chung, Kuo Piao ^a   Lai, Mei Shu ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PROGRAM; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; TAIWAN;

EID: 80052764289     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000314     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L, et al: Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 10:247, 2010
2. Robinson JC: Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. Milbank Q 79:149-177, 2001
3. Christianson JB, Knutson DJ, Mozze RS: Physician pay-for-performance: Implementation and research issues. J Gen Intern Med 21:S9-S13, 2006 (suppl 2)
4. Magnus SA: Physicians' financial incentives in five dimensions: A conceptual framework for HMO managers. Health Care Manage Rev 24:57-72, 1999
5. Pay-for-performance programs show quality improvements. Capitation Manag Rep 12:82-84, 2005
6. Looking at lessons on quality from the Medicare pay-for-performance hospital demonstration. Qual Lett Healthc Lead 17:2-3, 5-13, 2005
7. Trisolini M, Kautter J, Pope GC, et al: Physician Group Practice Demonstration Quality Measurement and Reporting Specifications, Version 2. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/DemoProjectsEvalRpts/downloads/Quality-Specs-Report.pdf
8. McDermott S, Williams T: Advancing Quality Through Collaboration: The California Pay for Performance Program: A Report on the First Five Years and a Strategic Plan for the Next Five Years. Integrated Healthcare Association, Oakland, CA, 2006
9. The Leapfrog Group: Profiles of Organizations Using Quality Incentives: Executive Summary. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-Profiles- Organizations-Using-Incentives.pdf
10. Galvin RS, Delbanco S, Milstein A, et al: Has the Leapfrog Group had an impact on the health care market? Health Aff (Millwood) 24:228-233, 2005 (Pubitemid 40169791)
11. Institute of Medicine recommends new P4P system for Medicare. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv 13:133-137, 2006
12. Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, et al: Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med 357:181-190, 2007
13. Abel P, Esmail A: Performance pay remuneration for consultants in the NHS: Is the current system fair and fit for purpose? J R Soc Med 99:487-493, 2006 (Pubitemid 44690260)
14. Pay for performance: An information paper for Georgia physicians. J Med Assoc Ga 96:20-23, 2007
15. Study casts new doubt on effectiveness of P4P. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv 14:88-89, 2007
16. Buetow S: Pay-for-performance in New Zealand primary health care. J Health Organ Manag 22:36-47, 2008
17. McNamara P: Quality-based payment: Six case examples. Int J Qual Health Care 17:357-362, 2005
18. Hindle D, Kalanj K: New general practitioner payment formula in Croatia: Is it consistent with worldwide trends? Croat Med J 45:604-610, 2004 (Pubitemid 39576306)
19. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, et al: Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med 145:265-272, 2006 (Pubitemid 46768610)
20. Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, et al: Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med 355:375-384, 2006 (Pubitemid 44127540)
21. Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, et al: Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med 356:486-496, 2007 (Pubitemid 46193076)
22. Glickman SW, Ou FS, DeLong ER, et al: Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 297:2373-2380, 2007 (Pubitemid 46883750)
23. Lee TT, Cheng SH, Chen CC, et al: A pay-for-performance program for diabetes care in Taiwan: A preliminary assessment. Am J Manag Care 16:65-69, 2010
24. Li YH, Tsai WC, Khan M, et al: The effects of pay-for-performance on tuberculosis treatment in Taiwan. Health Policy Plan 25:334-341, 2010
25. Chung KP, Lai MS, Cheng SH, et al: Organization-based performance measures of cancer care quality: Core measure development for breast cancer in Taiwan. Eur J Cancer Care 17:5-18, 2008
26. Bickell NA, Chassin MR: Determining the quality of breast cancer care: Do tumor registries measure up? Ann Intern Med 132:705-710, 2000 (Pubitemid 30244169)
27. Brown ML, Hankey BF, Ballard-Barbash R: Measuring the quality of breast cancer care. Ann Intern Med 133:920-920, 2000
28. Malin JL, Kahn KL, Adams J, et al: Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:835-844, 2002 (Pubitemid 34705055)
29. Klabunde CN, Harlan LC, Warren JL: Data sources for measuring comorbidity: A comparison of hospital records and medicare claims for cancer patients. Med Care 44:921-928, 2006 (Pubitemid 44454569)
30. Klabunde CN, Legler JM, Warren JL, et al: A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol 17:584-590, 2007 (Pubitemid 47096709)
31. Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, et al: Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1258-1267, 2000 (Pubitemid 32007842)
32. Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li Z, et al: Early experience with pay-for-performance: From concept to practice. JAMA 294:1788-1793, 2005 (Pubitemid 41434625)
33. Lester H, Schmittdiel J, Selby J, et al: The impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: Longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicators. BMJ 340:c1898, 2010
34. Sabatino SA, Habarta N, Baron RC, et al: Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers: Systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives. Am J Prev Med 35:S67-S74, 2008 (suppl 1)
35. Tisnado DM, Rose-Ash DE, Malin JL, et al: Financial incentives for quality in breast cancer care. Am J Manag Care 14:457-466, 2008 (Pubitemid 352031002)
36. Mehrotra A, Sorbero ME, Damberg CL: Using the lessons of behavioral economics to design more effective pay-for-performance programs. Am J Manag Care 16:497-503, 2010
37. Werner RM, Dudley RA: Making the 'pay' matter in pay-for-performance: Implications for payment strategies. Health Aff (Millwood) 28:1498-1508, 2009
38. Bokhour BG, Burgess JF Jr, Hook JM, et al: Incentive implementation in physician practices: A qualitative study of practice executive perspectives on pay for performance. Med Care Res Rev 63:73S-95S, 2006 (suppl 1)
39. Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li ZH, et al: Early experience with pay-for-performance: From concept to practice. JAMA 294:1788-1793, 2005 (Pubitemid 41434625)
40. Birkmeyer NJ, Birkmeyer JD: Strategies for improving surgical quality: Should payers reward excellence or effort? N Engl J Med 354:864-870, 2006