phyloMeta: A program for phylogenetic comparative analyses with meta-analysis

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 2603-2604

  Lajeunesse, Marc J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVOLUTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PHYLOGENY; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 80052754668     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr438     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Carmona,D. et al. (2011) Plant traits that predict resistance to herbivores. Funct. Ecol., 25, 358-367.
2. Felsenstein,J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat., 125, 1-15.
3. Hedges,L.V. (1992) Meta-analysis. J. Educ. Stat., 17, 279-296.
4. Hedges,S.B. and Kumar,S. (2009) The Timetree of Life. Oxford University Press, New York.
5. Hedges,L.V. and Olkin,I. (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis.Academic Press, NY.
6. Lajeunesse,M.J. (2009) Meta-analysis and the comparative phylogenetic method. Am. Nat., 174, 369-381.
7. Lajeunesse,M.J. (2010) Achieving synthesis with meta-analysis by combining and comparing all available studies. Ecology, 91, 2561-2564.
8. Lajeunesse,M.J. et al. (2011) Phylogenetically-independent meta-analysis. In Koricheva,J. et al. (eds) Handbook of Meta-Analysis in Ecology and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA (in press).
9. Meunier,J. et al. (2011) Eumelanin-based coloration and fitness parameters in birds: a meta-analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 65, 559-567.
10. Munguía-Rosas,M.A. et al. (2011) Meta-analysis of phenotypic selection on flowering phenology suggests that early flowering plants are favoured. Ecol. Lett., 14, 511-521.
11. Ord,T.J. et al. (2011) Contrasting theory with the empirical data of species recognition. Evolution (in press).
12. Rohlf,F.J. (2001) Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution, 55, 2143-2160.
13. Rosenberg,M.S. et al. (2000) MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
14. Viechtbauer,W. (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Software, 36, 1-48.
15. Webb,C.O. and Donoghue,M.J. (2004) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 5, 181-183.