Esophageal doppler monitoring during colorectal resection offers cost-effective improvement of hemodynamic control

Value in Health

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 818-826

  Maeso, Sergio ^a   Callejo, Daniel ^a   Hernández, Rodolfo ^b   Blasco, Juan A ^a   Andradas, Elena ^a  

^a Health Technology Assessment Unit UETS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cardiac imaging techniques; colorectal surgery; cost effectiveness; Doppler ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER MONITORING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

COLONIC DISEASES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ESOPHAGUS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MODELS, ECONOMIC; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECTAL DISEASES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 80052748386     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.02.1176     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. O. Boyd, and E.D. Bennett Achieving the goal Crit Care Med 27 1999 2298 2299 (Pubitemid 29508361)
2. M.G. Mythen, and A.R. Webb Intra-operative gut mucosal hypoperfusion is associated with increased post-operative complications and cost Intensive Care Med 20 1994 99 104 (Pubitemid 24120270)
3. S.E. Noblett, C.P. Snowden, B.K. Shenton, and A.F. Horgan Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection Br J Surg 93 2006 1069 1076 (Pubitemid 44343503)
4. D.H. Conway, R. Mayall, and M.S. bdul-Latif Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery Anaesthesia 57 2002 845 849 (Pubitemid 35021505)
5. S. Harvey, K. Stevens, and D. Harrison An evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in patient management in intensive care: a systematic review and a randomised controlled trial Health Technol Assess 10 2006 iii xi 1
6. J.D. Sandham, R.D. Hull, and R.F. Brant A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients N Engl J Med 348 2003 5 14 (Pubitemid 36026341)
7. M.I. Monge, A. Estella, J.C. Diaz, and A. Gil Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring with esophageal echoDoppler [in Spanish] Med Intensiva 32 2008 33 44
8. B.P. Cholley, and D. Payen Noninvasive techniques for measurements of cardiac output Curr Opin Crit Care 11 2005 424 429 (Pubitemid 41482697)
9. G. Mowatt, G. Houston, and R. Hernandez Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of oesophageal Doppler monitoring in critically ill and high-risk surgical patients Health Technol Assess 13 2009 1 118
10. ECRI Evidence-based Practice Center Esophageal doppler ultrasound-based cardiac output monitoring for real-time therapeutic management of hospitalized patients A review January 2007 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD Contract No. 290-02-0019
11. I. Chytra, R. Pradl, R. Bosman, P. Pelnar, E. Kasal, and A. Zidkova Esophageal Doppler-guided fluid management decreases blood lactate levels in multiple-trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial Crit Care 11 2007 R24
12. T.E.L. Dodd, R.N. McCormick, and F. Dorman Using the Oesophageal Doppler Monitor in Elective Colorectal Surgery Is it worth it?. Annual Meeting of Wessex Anaesthestists in Training 2004 Poole, UK
13. T.J. Gan, A. Soppitt, and M. Maroof Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery Anesthesiology 97 2002 820 826
14. M. McKendry, H. McGloin, and D. Saberi Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery BMJ 329 2004 258
15. M.G. Mythen, and A.R. Webb Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery Arch Surg 130 1995 423 429
16. S. Sinclair, S. James, and M. Singer Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial BMJ 315 1997 909 912 (Pubitemid 27425121)
17. R. Venn, A. Steele, and P. Richardson Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures Br J Anaesth 88 2002 65 71 (Pubitemid 34048564)
18. H.G. Wakeling, M.R. McFall, and C.S. Jenkins Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery Br J Anaesth 95 2005 634 642 (Pubitemid 41600025)
19. M. Bundgaard-Nielsen, K. Holte, N.H. Secher, and H. Kehlet Monitoring of peri-operative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51 2007 331 340
20. J.P.T. Higgins, and S. Green Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/ [Accessed April 18, 2011]
21. M.F. Drummond, M.J. Sculpher, and G.W. Torrance Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes 2005 Oxford University Press Oxford
22. K.V. Lowson, M.F. Drummond, and J.M. Bishop Costing new services: long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy Lancet 1 1981 1146 1149 (Pubitemid 11105809)
23. Grupo de Elaboración Validación de Instrumentos de Evaluación de la Calidad de los productos de Agencias/Unidades de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (GEVIEC). Madrid: Plan Nacional para el SNS del MSC. Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias. Agencia Laín Entralgo; 2008. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias: UETS N° 2006/01.
24. López Bastida J, Oliva J, Antoanzas F, et al. Propuesta de guía para la evaluación económica aplicada a las tecnologías sanitarias. Madrid: Plan Nacional para el SNS del MSC. Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud; 2008. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias: SESCS N° 2006/22.
25. I. Díez del Val Bypass gástrico abierto o laparoscópico: comparación de costes Cir Esp 75 2004 299 300
26. A. Gómez, B. Barrios, and M.A. Taibo Valor (beneficio/coste) de la cirugía laparoscópica en contraste con la abierta Comparación de costes Kirurgia 3 2005
27. A. Briggs, K. Claxton, and M. Sculpher Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation 2006 Oxford University Press Oxford
28. A. Briggs, M. Sculpher, and J. Dawson The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment: the case of total hip replacement Appl Health Econ Health Policy 3 2004 79 89 (Pubitemid 41018306)
29. R.M. de Verteuil, R.A. Hernández, L. Vale Aberdeen Health Technology Assessment Group Economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer Int J Technol Assess Health Care 23 2007 464 472 (Pubitemid 47586911)
30. G.P. Joshi Intraoperative fluid restriction improves outcome after major elective gastrointestinal surgery Anesth Analg 101 2005 601 605 (Pubitemid 41045253)
31. R. Pearse, D. Dawson, and J. Fawcett Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445] Crit Care 9 2005 R687 R693
32. H. Kehlet, and D.W. Wilmore Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome Am J Surg 183 2002 630 641 (Pubitemid 34722528)