Economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 464-472

  De Verteuil, Robyn M ^a   Hernández, Rodolfo A ^a   Vale, Luke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Cost effectiveness; Markov modeling; Surgery; Systematic Review

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC EVALUATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MARKOV MODELING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DATA REDUCTION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; ONCOLOGY; TUMORS;

SURGERY;

ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR;

COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MARKOV CHAINS; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 35348867944     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462307070559     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Benoist S, Pautrat K, Mitry E, et al. Treatment strategy for patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous irresectable liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1155-1160.
2. Bonjer HJ. Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer - a meta analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142:298-303.
3. British National Formulary. 2006. Available at: http://www.bnf.org/bnf. Accessed August 2005.
4. Cancer Research UK. UK bowel cancer statistics. 2006. Available at: http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/bowel/?a=5441. Accessed February 2006.
5. Champault GG, Barrat C, Raselli R, Elizalde A, Catheline JM. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: A prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12:88-95.
6. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050-2059.
7. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718-1726.
8. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg. 2006;93:300-308.
9. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224-2229.
10. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: Prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1187-1192.
11. MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group. Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: Results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2001;88:653-661.
12. Murray A, Lourenco T, de Verteuil R, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10 No.45.
13. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance for manufacturers and sponsors. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk. ed. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2001.
14. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal (reference N0515). Available at: http://www.nice.org. uk. ed. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2004.
15. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Review of NICE technology appraisal 17. 2006. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=TA105fullguidance. ed. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.
16. NHS reference costs 2006; Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/ PolicyAndGuidance/OrganisationPolicy/FinanceAndPlanning/NHSReferenceCosts/fs/en. Accessed November 2005.
17. Norum J, Vonen B, Olsen JA, Revhaug A. Adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and levamisole) in Dukes' B and C colorectal carcinoma. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Oncol. 1997;8:65-70.
18. Patankar SK, Larach SW, Ferrara A, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;46:601-611.
19. The COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: Short term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477-484.
20. Vardulaki KA, Bennett-Lloyd BD, Parfitt J, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. 2000; Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/download.aspx?o= 13507&template=download.aspx.
21. Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Brunt LM. Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1420-1425.