Assessment of EchoMRI-AH versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure human body composition

International Journal of Obesity

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1241-1246

  Galgani, J E ^a   Smith, S R ^a   Ravussin, E ^a  

^a PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

body mass index; fat mass; lean mass; nuclear magnetic resonance

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY FAT; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ECHOMRI AH; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEAN BODY WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY FAT DISTRIBUTION; BODY MASS INDEX; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WHOLE BODY IMAGING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052743590     PISSN: 03070565     EISSN: 14765497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2010.268     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 2000; 404: 635-643. (Pubitemid 30205068)
2. Cawthorne MA. Opportunities and challenges for the development of pharmacological therapies for obesity treatment. Obes Rev 2007; 8 (Suppl 1): 131-136.
3. Aronne LJ, Wadden T, Isoldi KK, Woodworth KA. When prevention fails: obesity treatment strategies. Am J Med 2009 122 (4 Suppl 1): S24-S32.
4. Taicher GZ, Tinsley FC, Reiderman A, Heiman ML. Quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) method for bone and whole-bodycomposition analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem 2003; 377: 990-1002. (Pubitemid 40877830)
5. Napolitano A, Miller SR, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA, Wright A, Finer N et al. Validation of a quantitative magnetic resonance method for measuring human body composition. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 191-198. (Pubitemid 351271971)
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
7. Jebb SA. Measurement of soft tissue composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Nutr 1997; 77: 151-163. (Pubitemid 27271798)
8. Plank LD. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2005; 8: 305-309. (Pubitemid 40586190)
9. Pietrobelli A, Formica C, Wang Z, Heymsfield SB. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts. Am J Physiol 1996; 271 (6 Part 1): E941-E951.
10. Jebb SA, Goldberg GR, Jennings G, Elia M. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of body composition: effects of depth and tissue thickness, including comparisons with direct analysis. Clin Sci (Lond) 1995; 88: 319-324.
11. Schoeller DA, Tylavsky FA, Baer DJ, Chumlea WC, Earthman CP, Fuerst T et al. QDR 4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer underestimates fat mass in comparison with criterion methods in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81: 1018-1025. (Pubitemid 41724942)
12. Widjaja A, Morris RJ, Levy JC, Frayn KN, Manley SE, Turner RC. Within-and between-subject variation in commonly measured anthropometric and biochemical variables. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 561-566. (Pubitemid 29165967)