Intelligibility rating with automatic speech recognition, prosodic, and cepstral evaluation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6836 LNAI, Issue , 2011, Pages 195-202

  Haderlein, Tino ^a   Moers, Cornelia ^b   Möbius, Bernd ^c   Rosanowski, Frank ^a   Nöth, Elmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^c SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC EVALUATION; AUTOMATIC METHOD; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CEPSTRAL; FEATURE SETS; HUMAN-MACHINE; PERCEPTUAL ANALYSIS; PROSODIC FEATURES; STANDARD DEVIATION; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSIONS; WORD ACCURACIES;

JITTER; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 80052743263     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23538-2_25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Awan, S., Roy, N.: Outcomes Measurement in Voice Disorders: Application of an Acoustic Index of Dysphonia Severity. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 52, 482-499 (2009)
2. Batliner, A., Buckow, J., Niemann, H., Nöth, E., Warnke, V.: The Prosody Module. In: Wahlster [18], pp. 106-121
3. Chen, K., Hasegawa-Johnson, M., Cohen, A., Borys, S., Kim, S.S., Cole, J., Choi, J.Y.: Prosody dependent speech recognition on radio news corpus of American English. IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 14, 232-245 (2006)
4. Haderlein, T.: Automatic Evaluation of Tracheoesophageal Substitute Voices, Studien zur Mustererkennung, vol. 25. Logos, Berlin (2007)
5. Halberstam, B.: Acoustic and Perceptual Parameters Relating to Connected Speech AreMore Reliable Measures of Hoarseness than Parameters Relating to Sustained Vowels. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 66, 70-73 (2004)
6. Hall, M.: Correlation-based Feature Subset Selection for Machine Learning. Ph.D. thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (1999)
7. Hillenbrand, J.: cpps.exe (software), http://homepages.wmich.edu/ ~hillenbr (accessed May 30, 2011)
8. Hillenbrand, J., Houde, R.: Acoustic Correlates of Breathy Vocal Quality: Dysphonic Voices and Continuous Speech. J. Speech Hear. Res. 39, 311-321 (1996)
9. International Phonetic Association (IPA): Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
10. Maier, A.: Speech of Children with Cleft Lip and Palate: Automatic Assessment, Studien zur Mustererkennung, vol. 29. Logos, Berlin (2009)
11. Maryn, Y., Roy, N., De Bodt, M., Van Cauwenberge, P., Corthals, P.: Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: A meta-analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 2619-2634 (2009)
12. Nöth, E., Batliner, A., Kießling, A., Kompe, R., Niemann, H.: VERBMOBIL: The Use of Prosody in the Linguistic Components of a Speech Understanding System. IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing 8, 519-532 (2000)
13. Parsa, V., Jamieson, D.: Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 44, 327-339 (2001)
14. Ruben, R.: Redefining the survival of the fittest: communication disorders in the 21st century. Laryngoscope 110, 241-245 (2000)
15. Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A.: Direct Modeling of Prosody: An Overview of Applications in Automatic Speech Processing. In: Proc. International Conference on Speech Prosody, Nara, Japan, pp. 575-582 (2004)
16. Smola, A., Schölkopf, B.: A Tutorial on Support Vector Regression. Statistics and Computing 14, 199-222 (2004)
17. Stemmer, G.: Modeling Variability in Speech Recognition, Studien zur Mustererkennung, vol. 19. Logos, Berlin (2005)
18. Wahlster, W. (ed.): Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation. Springer, Berlin (2000)
19. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: PracticalMachine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)