Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in OECD countries: Cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel causality analysis

Energy Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 6615-6621

  Nazlioglu, Saban ^a   Lebe, Fuat ^b   Kayhan, Selim ^b  

^a PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BOZOK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Economic growth; Nuclear energy consumption; Panel causality

Indexed keywords

CAUSALITY ANALYSIS; CONTROL VARIABLE; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; EMPIRICAL MODEL; LABOR FORCE; NEUTRALITY HYPOTHESIS; OECD COUNTRIES; PANEL CAUSALITY; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; STATISTICAL TOOLS;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PUBLIC POLICY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MECHANICS; TIME SERIES; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY USE; NUCLEAR POWER; OECD; PANEL DATA; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

EID: 80052713234     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Apergis N., Payne J.E. A panel study of nuclear energy consumption and economic growth. Energy Economics. 2010, 32:545-549.
2. Apergis N., Payne J.E., Menyah K., Wolde-Rufael Y. On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(11):2255-2260.
3. Breusch T., Pagan A. The Lagrange multiplier test and its application to model specifications in econometrics. Reviews of Economics Studies 1980, 47:239-253.
4. Granger C.W.J. Some aspects of causal relationships. Journal of Econometrics 2003, 112:69-71.
5. Kar M., Nazlioglu S., Agir H. Financial development and economic growth nexus in the MENA countries: bootstrap panel granger causality analysis. Economic Modelling 2011, 28(1-2):685-693.
6. Kónya L. Exports and growth: granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling 2006, 23:978-992.
7. Lee C.C., Chiu Y.B. Nuclear energy consumption, oil prices, and economic growth: evidence from highly industrialized countries. Energy Economics 2011, 33(2):236-248.
8. Mark N.C., Ogaki M., Sul D. Dynamic seemingly unrelated cointegrating regression. Review of Economic Studies 2005, 72:797-820.
9. Menyah K., Wolde-Rufael Y. CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy 2010, 38:2911-2915.
10. Nazlioglu S., Soytas U. World oil prices and agricultural commodity prices: evidence from an emerging market. Energy Economics 2011, 33:488-496.
11. Nuclear Energy Agency, NEA Strategic plan of the NEA 2011-2016 2010, OECD Publications, Paris.
12. OECD Nuclear Energy Today. Policy Brief 2005, OECD.
13. Ozturk I. A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy 2010, 38:340-349.
14. Payne J.E. Survey of the international evidence on the causal relationship between energy consumption and growth. Journal of Economic Studies 2010, 37(1):53-95.
15. Payne J.E., Taylor J.P. Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in the US: an empirical note. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2010, 5(3):301-307.
16. Pesaran, M.H., 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. IZA Discussion Paper 1240, Institute for the Study of Labor.
17. Toda H.Y., Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics 1995, 66:225-250.
18. Wolde-Rufael Y. Bounds test approach to cointegration and causality between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy 2010, 38:52-58.
19. Wolde-Rufael Y., Menyah K. Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in nine developed countries. Energy Economics 2010, 32:550-556.
20. Yoo S.H., Jung K.O. Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in Korea. Progress in Nuclear Energy 2005, 46(2):101-109.
21. Yoo S.H., Ku S.J. Casual relationship between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth: a multi-country analysis. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1905-1913.
22. Zellner A. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1962, 57:348-368.