A panel study of nuclear energy consumption and economic growth

Energy Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 545-549

  Apergis, Nicholas ^a   Payne, James E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PIRAEUS   (Greece)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Granger causality; Growth; Nuclear energy; Panel

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC GROWTHS; GRANGER-CAUSALITY; LABOR FORCE; NUCLEAR ENERGY CONSUMPTION; PANEL COINTEGRATION; VECTOR ERROR CORRECTION MODEL;

ECONOMICS; ERROR CORRECTION;

NUCLEAR ENERGY;

COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY USE; ERROR CORRECTION; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR POWER; NUMERICAL MODEL;

EID: 77950517581     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Apergis N., Payne J.E. Energy consumption and economic growth in Central America: evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Economics 2009, 31:211-216.
2. Apergis N., Payne J.E. Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from the commonwealth of independent states. Energy Economics 2009, 31:641-647.
3. Banerjee A. Panel data unit roots and cointegration: an overview. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1999, S1(61):607-629.
4. Breitung J. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics 2000, 15:161-177.
5. Carrion-i-Silvestre J.L., del Barrio-Castro T., Lopez-Bazo E. Breaking the panels: an application to GDP per capita. Econometrics Journal 2005, 8:159-175.
6. Choi I. Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance 2001, 20:249-272.
7. Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 1987, 55:251-276.
8. Fiore K. Nuclear energy and sustainability: understanding ITER. Energy Policy 2006, 34:3334-3341.
9. Hadri K. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometric Journal 2000, 3:148-161.
10. Holtz-Eakin D. Testing for individual effects in dynamic models using panel data. NBER Technical Paper Series", No. 57 1986.
11. Holtz-Eakin D., Newey W., Rosen H. Implementing causality tests with panel data with an example from local public finance. NBER Technical Working Paper, No. 48 1985.
12. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 2003, 115:53-74.
13. Levin A., Lin C.F., Chu C. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 2002, 108:1-24.
14. Lutkepohl H. Non-causality due to omitted variables. Journal of Econometrics 1982, 19:267-378.
15. Payne, J.E., forthcoming. "Survey of the International Evidence on the Causal Relationship between Energy Consumption and Growth". Journal of Economic Studies.
16. Payne, J.E., Taylor, J.P., forthcoming. "Nuclear Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in the U.S.: An Empirical Note". Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy.
17. Pedroni P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1999, 61:653-670.
18. Pedroni P. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics 2000, 15:93-130.
19. Pedroni P. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Econometric Theory 2004, 20:597-627.
20. Pesaran H.M., Shin Y., Smith R.P. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1999, 94:621-634.
21. Soytas U., Sari R. Can China contribute more to the fight against global warming?. Journal of Policy Modeling 2006, 28:837-846.
22. Soytas U., Sari R. The relationship between energy and production: evidence from Turkish manufacturing industry. Energy Economics 2007, 29:1151-1165.
23. Soytas U., Sari R. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:1667-1675.
24. Soytas U., Sari R., Ewing B.T. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics 2007, 62:482-489.
25. Toth F.L., Rogner H.H. Oil and nuclear power: past, present, and future. Energy Economics 2006, 28:1-25.
26. Vaillancourt K., Labriet M., Loulou R., Waaub J.P. The role of nuclear energy in long-term climate scenarios: an analysis with the world-times model. Energy Policy 2008, 36:2296-2307.
27. Wolde-Rufael Y. Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in nine developed countries. working paper 2009.
28. Wolde-Rufael, Y., forthcoming. "Nuclear Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Taiwan". Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy.
29. Yoo S.H., Jung K.O. Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in Korea. Progress in Nuclear Energy 2005, 46:101-109.
30. Yoo S.H., Ku S.J. Causal relationship between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth: a multi-country analysis. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1905-1913.