The development of research tools used in the STORK Study (the Scottish Trial of Refer or Keep) to explore midwives' intrapartum decision making

Midwifery

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 576-581

  Styles, Maggie ^a   Cheyne, Helen ^a   O'Carroll, Ronan ^a   Greig, Fiona ^b   Dagge Bell, Fiona ^c   Niven, Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b PERTH ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Midwives; Online survey; Questionnaire; Vignettes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DELIVERY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LABOR COMPLICATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDWIFE; MODEL; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREGNANCY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDWIFERY; MODELS, NURSING; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING ASSESSMENT; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK MANAGEMENT; SCOTLAND; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 80052689313     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alexander, S.A., Becker, H.J., 1978. The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly 42, 93-104.
2. Barter, C., Renold, E., 1999. The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research. Social Research Update. University of Surrey. (last accessed 15 November 2004). http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU25.html.
3. Birthchoice. Homebirth Statistics. (last accessed 6 March 2008). http://www.birthchoice.com.
4. BMJ Clinical Evidence. Pre-eclampsia Information (last accessed 6 March 2008). http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com.
5. Cheyne H., Hundley V., Dowding D., et al. Effects of an algorithm for diagnosis of active labour: cluster randomised trial. British Medical Journal 2008, 337:a2396.
6. Cioffi J. Heuristics, servants to intuition, in clinical decision making. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997, 26:203-208.
7. Costa P.T., McRae R.R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Facto Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual 1992, Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Odessa, FL.
8. Eun-ok I.M., Wonshik C. Recruitment of research participants through the internet. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2004, 22:289-297.
9. Finch J. The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology 1987, 21:105-114.
10. Franken R.E., Gibson K.J., Rowland G.L. Sensation seeking and the tendency to view the world as threatening. Personality and Individual Differences 1992, 13:31-38.
11. Myles Textbook for Midwives. 2009, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. 15th edn. D. Fraser, M. Cooper (Eds.).
12. Gould D. Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: how valid are the findings?. Journal of Clinical Nursing 1996, 5:207-212.
13. Harrison J.D., Young J.M., Butow P., Salkeld G., Solomon M.J. Is it worth the risk? A systematic review of instruments that measure risk propensity for use in the health setting. Social Science and Medicine 2005, 60:1385-1396.
14. Hughes R., Huby M. The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2001, 37:382-386.
15. Information and Statistics Division. (last accessed 6 March 2008). http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/1022.html.
16. Kypri K., Gallagher S.J., Cashell-Smith M.L. An internet-based survey method for college student drinking research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2004, 76:45-53.
17. Loy J. Midwives and their use of the internet. Midwifery Information and Resource Services Digest 2001, 11:25-27.
18. Ludwick R., Zeller R.A. The factorial survey: an experimental method to replicate real world problems. Nursing Research 2001, 50:129-133.
19. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence, 2007. (last accessed 12 March 2008). http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG55.
20. Nicholson N., Fenton-O'Creevy M., Soane E., Willman P. Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research 2005, 8:157-176.
21. Peabody J.W., Luck J., Glassman P., et al. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004, 141:771-780.
22. Shannon D.M., Johnson T.E., Searcy S., Lott A. Using electronic surveys: advice from survey professionals. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation: a Peer Reviewed Electronic Journal 2001, 8. (last accessed 30 December 2003).
23. Spalding N.J. Using vignettes to assist reflection within and action research study on a preoperative education programme. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2004, 67:388-395.
24. Styles, M., Cheyne, H., O'Carroll, R., Greig, F., Dagge-Bell, F., Niven, C., in press. The Scottish Trial of Refer or Keep (the STORK Study): midwives' intrapartum decision making. Midwifery, 10.1016/j.midw.2009.12.003.
25. Whitten, D., Green, K.W., and Medlin, B., 2001. Internet survey methodology: comparison with mail surveys, Quirk's Marketing Research Review, 49-54. (last accessed 10 June 2010). http://www.quirks.com/articles/a2001/20010703.aspx?searchID=99643481.
26. Wickham S., Stewart S. Midwives and their use of the internet. Midwifery Digest 2001, 11:25-31.
27. Wilks T. The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qualitative Social Work 2004, 3:1.