Testing to enhance retention in human anatomy

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 243-248

  Logan, Jessica M ^a   Thompson, Andrew J ^a,b   Marshak, David W ^c  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy education; Assessment; E learning; Human gross anatomy; Retention

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; TIME;

ANATOMY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 80052677532     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.250     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bergman EM, Prince KJ, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. 2008. How much anatomy is enough? Anat Sci Educ 1: 184-188.
2. Butler AC, Roediger HLIII. 2007. Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. Eur J Cogn Psychol 19: 514-527.
3. Butler AC, Roediger HLIII. 2008. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Mem Cognit 36: 604-616.
4. Bjork RA. 1994. Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In: Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP (Editors). Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing.1st Ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p 185-205.
5. Burns ER. 2010. "Anatomizing" reversed: Use of examination questions that foster use of higher order learning skills by students. Anat Sci Educ 3: 330-334.
6. Carrier M, Pashler H. 1992. The influence of retrieval on retention. Mem Cognit 20: 633-642.
7. Carpenter SK. 2009. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35: 1563-1569.
8. Chan JC, McDermott KB, Roediger HLIII. 2006. Retrieval-induced facilitation: Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. J Exp Psychol Gen 135: 553-571.
9. Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. 2009. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ 2: 253-259.
10. Gardiner JM, Craik FI, Bleasdale FA. 1973. Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall. Mem Cognit 1: 213-216.
11. Glover JA. 1989. The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. J Educ Psychol 81: 392-399.
12. Karpicke JD, Roediger HLIII. 2008. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 319: 966-968.
13. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HLIII. 2008. Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ 42: 959-966.
14. LCME. 2010. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the M.D. Degree. June, 2010. Washington, DC, Liaison Committee on Medical Education. 28 p. URL: [accessed 14 April 2011].
15. Logan JM, Balota DA. 2008. Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 15: 257-280.
16. Marsh KR, Giffin BF, Lowrie DJJr. 2008. Medical student retention of embryonic development: Impact of the dimensions added by multimedia tutorials. Anat Sci Educ 1: 252-257.
17. McDaniel MA, Anderson JL, Derbish MH, Morrisette N. 2007. Testing the testing effect in the classroom. Eur J Cogn Psychol 19: 494-513.
18. Roediger HLIII, Karpicke JD. 2006a. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci 17: 249-255.
19. Roediger HLIII, Karpicke JD. 2006b. The power of testing memory: Basic research and implication for educational practice. Perspect Psychol Sci 1: 181-210.
20. Roediger HLIII, Agarwal PK, Kang SHK, Marsh EJ. 2010. Benefits of testing memory: Best practices and boundary conditions. In: Davies GM, Wright DB (Editors). Current Issues in Applied Memory Research.1st Ed. Brighton, UK: Psychology Press. p 13-49.
21. Smythe G, Hughes D. 2008. Self-directed learning in gross human anatomy: Assessment outcomes and student perceptions. Anat Sci Educ 1: 145-153.
22. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. 2010. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ 3: 83-93.
23. Thompson CP, Wenger SK, Bartling CA. 1978. How recall facilitates subsequent recall: A reappraisal. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 4: 210-221.
24. Ward PJ, Walker JJ. 2008. The influence of study methods and knowledge processing on academic success and long-term recall of anatomy learning by first-year veterinary students. Anat Sci Educ 1: 68-74.