Drug treatment aftercare in the criminal justice system: A systematic review

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 311-320

  Pelissier, Bernadette ^a   Jones, Nicole ^a   Cadigan, Timothy ^b  

^a FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS   (United States)

^b Administrative Office of the United States Courts   (United States)

Author keywords

Aftercare; Drug treatment; Prison

Indexed keywords

AFTERCARE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COURT; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OFFENDER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRISON; TREATMENT PLANNING;

AFTERCARE; CRIMINAL LAW; HUMANS; PRISONS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TERMINOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33947311844     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aos S., Miller M., and Drake E. Evidence-based adult corrections programs: What works and what does not (2006), Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
2. Belenko S. Assessing released inmates for substance-abuse-related service needs. Crime & Delinquency 1 (2006) 94-113
3. Burdon W.M., Messina N., and Prendergast M. The California treatment expansion initiative: Aftercare participation, recidivism, and predictors of outcomes. Prison Journal 84 (2004) 61-80
4. Butzin C.A., Martin S.S., and Inciardi J.A. Evaluating component effects of a prison-based treatment continuum. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 22 (2002) 63-69
5. Butzin C.A., Martin S., and Inciardi J.A. Treatment during transition from prison to community and subsequent illicit drug use. Journal Of Substance Abuse Treatment 28 (2005) 351-358
6. Chanhatasilpa C., MacKenzie D.L., and Hickman L.J. The effectiveness of community-based program for chemically depending offender: A review and assessment of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 19 (2000) 383-393
7. De Leon G., Melnick G., Thomas G., Kressel D., and Wexler H.K. Motivation for treatment in a prison-based therapeutic community. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 26 (2000) 33-46
8. Griffith J.D., Hiller M.L., Knight K., and Simpson D.D. A cost-effectiveness analysis of in-prison therapeutic community treatment and risk classification. Prison Journal 79 (1999) 352-368
9. Harris P.M., Gingerich R., and Whittaker T.A. The "effectiveness" of differential supervision. Crime and Delinquency 50 (2004) 235-271
10. Harrison L., and Martin S.S. Residential substance abuse treatment for state prisoners: Implementation lessons learned. (No NCJ-195738) (2003), National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
11. Hiller M.L., Knight K., and Simpson D.D. Prison-based substance abuse treatment, residential aftercare and recidivism. Addiction 94 (1999) 833-842
12. Inciardi J.A., Martin S.S., and Butzin C.A. Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime and Delinquency 51 (2004) 88-107
13. Inciardi J.A., Martin S.S., Butzin C.A., Hooper R.M., and Harrison L.D. An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues 27 (1997) 261-278
14. Knight K., Simpson D.D., and Hiller M.L. Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. Prison Journal 79 (1999) 337-351
15. Langan P.A., and Levin D.J. Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994 (2002), Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC
16. La Vigne N., Visher C., and Castro J. Chicago prisoners' experience returning home (2004), The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
17. Lynch J. Prisoner reentry: Beyond program evaluation. Criminology and Public Policy 5 (2006) 401-412
18. Martin S.S., Butzin C.A., Saum C.A., and Inciardi J.A. Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release aftercare. Prison Journal 79 (1999) 294-320
19. McBride D., VanderWaal C., and Terry-McElrath Y. The drugs-crime wars: Past, present and future directions in theory, policy, and program interventions. Towards a drugs and crime research agenda for the 21st century (2003), National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
20. McBride D., and McCoy C. The drugs-crime relationship: An analytic framework. Prison Journal 43 (1993) 257-278
21. McKay J.R. Effectiveness of continuing care interventions for substance abusers: Implications for the study of long-term treatment effects. Evaluation Review 25 (2001) 211-232
22. Mears D., Moore G., Travis J., and Winterfield L. Improving the link between research and drug treatment in correctional settings (2002), The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
23. Mumola C.J. Substance abuse and treatment, state and federal prisoners, 1997. (No. NCJ 172871) (1999), Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC
24. National Institute of Corrections. Responding to parole and probation violations: A handbook to guide local policy development (2001), National Institute of Corrections, Washington, DC
25. National Institute of Justice. 2003 Arrestee drug abuse monitoring: Annual report (2003), National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
26. Pelissier B.M.M., Motivans M.A., and Rounds-Bryant J.L. Substance abuse treatment outcomes: A multi-site study of male and female prison programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 41 (2005) 57-81
27. Pelissier B.M.M., Wallace S.B., O'Neil J.A., Gaes G.G., Camp S., Rhodes W., et al. Federal prison residential drug treatment reduces substance use and arrests after release. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 27 (2001) 315-337
28. Peters R.H., and Wexler H.K. Substance abuse treatment for adults in the criminal justice system: A treatment improvement protocol TIP 44 (2005), Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD
29. Prendergast M.A., Hall E.A., Wexler H.K., Melnick G., and Cao Y. Amity prison-based therapeutic community: 5-year outcomes. Prison Journal 84 (2004) 36-60
30. Prendergast M., Wellisch J., and Wong M.M. Residential treatment for women parolees following prison-based drug treatment: Treatment experiences, needs and services, outcomes. Prison Journal 76 (1996) 253-274
31. Re-Entry Policy Council. Report of the re-entry policy council: Charting the safe and successful return of prisoners to the community (2003), Re-Entry Policy Council, New York City
32. Rhodes W., Pelissier B.M.M., Gaes G.G., Saylor W., Camp S., and Wallace S.B. Alternative solutions to the problem of selection bias in an analysis of federal residential drug treatment programs. Evaluation Review 25 (2001) 331-369
33. Simpson D.D., Wexler H.K., and Inciardi J.A. Drug treatment outcomes for correctional settings, part 1. [Special issue]. Prison Journal 79 (1999) 291-371
34. Taxman F. Reducing recidivism through a seamless system of care: Components of effective treatment, supervision, and transitional services in the community (1998), Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC
35. Travis J., and Lawrence S. Beyond the prison gates: The state of parole in America (2002), The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
36. Visher C., and La Vigne N. Returning home: Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry: Maryland Pilot Study: Findings from Baltimore (2003), The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
37. Wexler H.K., De Leon G., Thomas G., Kressel D., and Peters J. The Amity prison TC evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior 26 (1999) 147-167
38. Wexler H.K., Melnick G., and Cao Y. Risk and prison substance abuse treatment outcomes: A replication and challenge. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 84 (2004) 106-120
39. Wexler H.K., Melnick G., Lowe L., and Peters J. Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. Prison Journal 79 (1999) 321-336