Pollenpistil interactions and self-incompatibility in the Asteraceae: New insights from studies of Senecio squalidus (Oxford ragwort)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 108, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 687-698

  Allen, Alexandra M ^a   Thorogood, Christopher J ^a   Hegarty, Matthew J ^b   Lexer, Christian ^c   Hiscock, Simon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Asteraceae; pistil; pollen; pollenpistil interactions; self incompatibility; Senecio; stigma; transcriptome

Indexed keywords

CYTOLOGY; DICOTYLEDON; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HISTORICAL RECORD; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; POLLEN; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY; SPOROPHYTE;

ASTERACEAE; BRASSICACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SENECIO; SENECIO SQUALIDUS;

TRANSCRIPTOME;

GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY (PLANT); SENECIO;

POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN FLOWERING PLANTS; SENECIO; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 80052670748     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr147     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Abbott RJ, Lowe AJ. 2004. Origins, establishment and evolution of new polyploid species: Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis in the British Isles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 467-474.
2. Abbott RJ, Brennan AC, James JK, Forbes DG, Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ. 2009. Recent hybrid origin and invasion of the British Isles by a selfincompatible species, Oxford ragwort (Senecio squalidus L., Asteraceae). Biological Invasions 11: 1145-1158.
3. Allen AM, Lexer C, Hiscock SJ. 2010a. Characterisation of sunflower-21 (SF21) genes expressed in pollen and pistil of Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae) and their relationship with other members of the SF21 gene family. Sexual Plant Reproduction 23: 173-186.
4. Allen AM, Lexer C, Hiscock SJ. 2010b. Comparative analysis of pistil transcriptomes reveals conserved and novel genes expressed in dry, wet, and semidry stigmas. Plant Physiology 154: 1347-1360.
5. APG III, The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
6. Bateman AJ. 1952. Self-incompatibility in angiosperms: I. Theory. Heredity 6: 285-310.
7. Brennan AC, Harris SA, Hiscock SJ. 2005. Modes and rates of selfing and associated inbreeding depression in the self-incompatible plant Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae): A successful colonizing species in the British Isles. New Phytologist 168: 475-486.
8. Brennan AC, Harris SA, Hiscock SJ. 2006. The population genetics of sporophytic self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): S allele diversity across the British range. Evolution 60: 213-224.
9. Brennan AC, Tabah DA, Harris SA, Hiscock SJ. 2010. Sporophytic selfincompatibility in Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae): S allele dominance interactions and modifiers of cross-compatibility and selfing rates. Heredity 106: 113-123.
10. Carter C, Thornburg RW. 2004. Is the nectar redox cycle a floral defense against microbial attack? Trends in Plant Sciences 9: 320-324.
11. Crowe L. 1954. Incompatibility in Cosmos bipinnatus. Heredity 8: 1-11.
12. Dickinson HG. 1995. Dry stigmas, water and self-incompatibility in Brassica. Sexual Plant Reproduction 8: 1-10.
13. Dickinson HG, Lewis D. 1975. Interaction between the pollen grain coating and the stigmatic surface during compatible and incompatible interspecific pollinations in Raphanus. In: Duckett JC, Racey PA. eds. The Biology of the Male Gamete. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 7 (Suppl. 1): 165-175.
14. East EM, Mangelsdorf AJ. 1925. A new interpretation of the hereditary behaviour of self-sterile plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 11: 166-171.
15. Edlund AF, Swanson R, Preuss D. 2004. Pollen and stigma structure and function: The role of diversity in pollination. Plant Cell 16: S84-S97.
16. Elleman CJ, Franklin-Tong VE, Dickinson HG. 1992. Pollination in species with dry stigmas: The nature of the early stigmatic response and the pathway taken by pollen tubes. New Phytologist 121: 413-424.
17. Ferrer MM, Good-Avila SV. 2007. Macrophylogenetic analyses of the gain and loss of self-incompatibility in the Asteraceae. New Phytologist 173: 401-414.
18. Franklin-Tong VE. 2008. Self-incompatibility in Papaver rhoeas: Progress in understanding mechanisms involved in regulating self-incompatibility in Papaver. In: Frankloin-Tong VE. ed. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 237-258.
19. Gamas P, Niebel Fde C, Lescure N, Cullimore J. 1996. Use of a subtractive hybridization approach to identify new Medicago truncatula genes induced during root nodule development. Molecular Plant and Microbe Interactions 9: 233-242.
20. Galaud JP, Laval V, Carriere M, et al. 1997. Osmotic stress activated expression of an Arabidopsis plasma membrane-associated protein: Sequence and predicted secondary structure. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1341: 79-86.
21. Gerstel DU. 1950. Self-incompatibility studies in Guayule. Genetics 35: 482-506.
22. Guan YF, Huang XY, Zhu J, Gao JF, Zhang HX, Yang ZN. 2008. RUPTURED POLLEN GRAIN1, a member of the MtN3/saliva gene family, is crucial for exine pattern formation and cell integrity of microspores in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 147: 852-863.
23. Harris SA. 2002. Introduction of Oxford ragwort, Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae), to the United Kingdom. Watsonia 24: 31-43.
24. Hegarty M, Jones J, Wilson I, et al. 2005. Development of anonymous cDNA microarrays to study changes to the Senecio floral transcriptome during hybrid speciation. Molecular Ecology 14: 2493-2510.
25. Hegarty MJ, Barker GL, Wilson ID, Abbott RJ, Edwards KJ, Hiscock SJ. 2006. Transcriptome shock after interspecific hybridization in Senecio is ameliorated by genome duplication. Current Biology 16: 1652-1659.
26. Heslop-Harrison J. 1975. Incompatibility and the pollen-stigma interaction. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 26: 403-425.
27. Heslop-Harrison Y. 1981. Stigma characteristics and angiosperm taxonomy. Nordic Journal of Botany 1: 401-420.
28. Heslop-Harrison Y. 2000. Control gates and micro-ecology: The pollen-stigma interaction in perspective. Annals of Botany 85: 5-13.
29. Heslop-Harrison Y, Shivanna KR. 1977. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Annals of Botany 41: 1233-1258.
30. Hiscock SJ. 2000a. Self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae). Annals of Botany 85 (Suppl. A): 181-190.
31. Hiscock SJ. 2000b. Genetic control of self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteracae): A successful colonizing species. Heredity 85: 10-19.
32. Hiscock SJ, Allen AM. 2008. Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollen-stigma interactions: The search for consensus. New Phytologist 179: 286-317.
33. Hiscock SJ, Coleman J, Dewey FM, Dickinson HG. 1994. Identification and localization of an active cutinase in the pollen of Brassica napus L. Planta 193: 377-384.
34. Hiscock SJ, Bown D, Gurr SJ, Dickinson HG. 2002a. Serine esterases are required for pollen tube penetration of the stigma in Brassica. Sexual Plant Reproduction 15: 65-74.
35. Hiscock SJ, Hoedemaekers K, Friedman WE, Dickinson HG. 2002b. The stigma surface and pollen-stigma interactions in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae) following cross (compatible) and self (incompatible) pollinations. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 1-16.
36. Hiscock SJ, McInnis SM, Tabah DA, Henderson CA, Brennan ACE. 2003. Sporophytic self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae) - the search for S. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 169-174.
37. Hormazo JI, Herrero M. 1992. Pollen selection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83: 663-672.
38. Howlett BJ, Knox RB, Paxton JD, Heslop-Harrison J. 1975. Pollen wall proteins: Physicochemical characterization and role in selfincompatibility in Cosmos bipinnatus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 188: 167-182.
39. Hughes MB, Babcock EB. 1950. Self-incompatibility in Crepis foetida L. subsp. Rhoeadifolia Bieb. Schinz et Keller. Genetics 35: 570-588.
40. James JK, Abbott RJ. 2005. Recent, allopatric, homoploid hybrid speciation: The origin of Oxford ragwort, Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae), in the British Isles. Evolution 59: 2533-2547.
41. Jennings DB, Ehrenshaft M, Pharr DM, Williamson JD. 1998. Roles for mannitol and mannitol dehydrogenase in active oxygen-mediated plant defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 15129-15133.
42. Johnson MA, Preuss D. 2003. On your mark, get set, GROW! LePRK2- LAT52 interactions regulate pollen tube growth. Trends in Plant Science 8: 97-99.
43. Kim S, Mollet J-C, Dong J, Zhang K, Park S-Y, Lord EM. 2003. Chemocyanin, a small basic protein from the lily stigma, induces pollen tube chemotropism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100: 16125-16130.
44. Knox RB. 1973. Pollen-wall proteins: Pollen-stigma interactions in ragweed and Cosmos (Compositae). Journal of Cell Science 12: 421-443.
45. Kräuter-Canham R, Bronner R, Evrad JL, Hahne G, Friedt W, Steinmetz A. 1997. A transmitting tissue- and pollen-expressed protein from sunflower with sequence similarity to the human RTP protein. Plant Science 129: 191-202.
46. Lord EM. 2003. Adhesion and guidance in compatible pollination. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 47-54.
47. Mayfield JA, Fiebig A, Johnstone SE, Preuss D. 2001. Gene families from the Arabidopsis thaliana pollen coat proteome. Science 292: 2482-2485.
48. McClure, et al. Compatibility and incompatibility in S-RNase-based systems. Manuscript #10622R of Special Edition.
49. McInnis SM, Costa LM, Gutiérrez-Marcos JF, Henderson CA, Hiscock SJ. 2005. Isolation and characterization of a polymorphic stigma-specific class III peroxidase gene from Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae). Plant Molecular Biology 57: 659-677.
50. McInnis SM, Desikan R, Hancock JT, Hiscock SJ. 2006. Production of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species by angiosperm stigmas and pollen: Potential signalling crosstalk. New Phytologist 172: 221-228.
51. Meng X, Sun P, Kao T-h. 2011. S-RNase-based self-incompatibility in Petunia inflata. Annals of Botany 108: 637-646.
52. Mulcahy DL. 1979. The rise of angiosperms: A genecological factor. Science 206: 20-23.
53. Okuda T, Kondoh H. 1999. Identification of new genes Ndr2 and Ndr3 which are related to Ndr1/RTP/Drg1 but show distinct tissue specificity and response to N-myc. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 266: 208-215.
54. Park SY, Lord EM. 2003. Expression studies of SCA in lily and confirmation of its role in pollen tube adhesion. Plant Molecular Biology 51: 183-189.
55. Poulter NS, Bosch M, Franklin-Tong VE. 2011. Proteins implicated in mediating self-incompatibility-induced alterations to the actin cytoskeleton of Papaver pollen. Annals of Botany 108: 659-675.
56. Rahmann MH, Uchiyama M, Kuno M, et al. 2007. Expression of stigmaand anther-specific genes located in the S locus region of Ipomoea trifida. Sexual Plant Reproduction 20: 73-85.
57. Swanson WJ, Vacquier VD. 2002. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 137-144.
58. Tabah DA, McInnis SM, Hiscock SJ. 2004. Members of the S-receptor kinase multigene family in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae), a species with sporophytic self-incompatibility. Sexual Plant Reproduction 17: 131-140.
59. Takayama S, Isogai A. 2005. Self-incompatibility in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56: 467-489.
60. Vithanage HIMV, Knox RB. 1977. Development and cytochemistry of stigma surface and response to self and foreign pollination in Helianthus annuus. Phytomorphology 27: 168-179.
61. Yang B, Sugio A, White FF. 2006. Os8N3 is a host disease-susceptibility gene for bacterial blight of rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103: 10503-10508.
62. Zinkl GM, Preuss D. 2000. Dissecting Arabidopsis pollen-stigma interactions reveals novel mechanisms that confer mating specificity. Annals of Botany 85: 15-21.
63. Zinkl GM, Zweibel BI, Grier DG, Preuss D. 1999. Pollen-stigma adhesion in Arabidopsis: A species-specific interaction mediated by hydrophobic molecules in the pollen exine. Development 126: 5431-5440.