Using a historical aerial photograph analysis to inform trout habitat restoration efforts

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1693-1702

  Baillie, Marshall B ^a   Salant, Nira L ^a   Schmidt, John C ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aerial photographs; Bank erosion; Bonneville cutthroat trout; Fine sediment; Lateral channel migration; Restoration planning

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS; BANK EROSION; BONNEVILLE CUTTHROAT TROUT; CHANNEL MIGRATION; FINE SEDIMENTS; RESTORATION PLANNING;

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; ECOSYSTEMS; EROSION; FRUITS; PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT; RESTORATION; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SOIL MECHANICS;

BANK PROTECTION;

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; BANK EROSION; EROSION RATE; FLUVIAL DEPOSIT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT RESTORATION; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; RIVER BANK;

FRAGARIA X ANANASSA; ONCORHYNCHUS CLARKII UTAH; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 80052631021     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.2196     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allmendinger NE, Pizzuto JE, Potter N, Johnson TE, Hession WC. 2005. The influence of riparian vegetation on stream width, eastern Pennsylvania, USA. GSA Bulletin 117: 229-243. DOI: 10.1130/B25447.41.
2. Beechie TJ, Beamer E, Wasserman L. 1994. Estimating coho salmon rearing habitat and smolt production losses in a large river basand implications for habitat restoration. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14: 797-811.
3. Church MA, McLean DG, Wolcott JF. 1987. River bed gravels: sampling and analysis. In Sediment Transport in Gravel-Bed Rivers, John Wiley & Sons: New York; 43-88.
4. Constantine CR, Dunne T, Hansen GJ. 2009. Examining the physical meaning of the bank erosion coefficient used in meander migration modeling. Geomorphology 106: 242-252.
5. Davies-Colley RJ. 1997. Stream channels are narrower in pasture than in forest, New Zealand. Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 31: 599-608.
6. Downs P, Kondolf GM. 2002. Post-project appraisal in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environmental Management 29: 477-496.
7. Everitt BL. 1968. Use of the cottonwood in an investigation of the recent history of a floodplain. American Journal of Science 266: 417-439.
8. Hickman T, Raleigh RF. 1982. Habitat suitability index models: cutthroat trout. USDA Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-82/10.5.
9. Hughes ML, McDowell PF, Marcus WA. 2006. Accuracy assessment of georectified aerial photographs: implications for measuring lateral channel movement in a GIS. Geomorphology 74(1-4): 1-16.
10. Johnson WC, Burgess RL, Keammerer WR. 1976. Forest overstory vegetation and environment on the Missouri River floodplain in North Dakota. Ecological Monographs' 46: 59-84.
11. Kondolf GM. 2000. Assessing salmonid spawning gravels. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 262-281.
12. Kondolf GM, Larson M. 1995. Historical channel analysis and its application to riparian and aquatic habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation - Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5: 109-126.
13. Kondolf GM, Angermeier P, Cummins K, Dunne T, Healey M, Kimmerer W, Moyle PB, Murphy D, Patten D, Railsback S, Reed D, Spies R, Twiss R. 2008. Prioritizing river restoration: projecting cumulative benefits of multiple projects: an example from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system in California. Environmental Management 42: 933-945.
14. Kondolf GM, Piégay H, Sear D. 2003. Integrating geomorphological tools in ecological and management studies. In Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, Kondolf GM, Piégay H (eds). John Wiley & Sons: New York; 633-660.
15. LaRue EC. 1916. Colorado River and its utilization. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 395.
16. Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging, 2006. ERDAS IMAGINE Essentials Tour Guides, Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging, LLC, 5051 Peachtree Corners Circle, Suite 100, Norcross, GA.
17. Lentsch L, Converse Y, Perkins J. 1997. Conservation agreement and strategy for Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah) in the State of Utah. Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources: Utah Publication number 97.
18. Leys KF, Werrity K. 1999. River channel planform change: software for historical analysis. Geomorphology 29: 107-120.
19. Maindonald J, Braun J. 2003. Data Analysis and Graphics Using R: An Example-based Approach. Cambridge University Press: New York.
20. McNeil WJ, Ahnell WH. 1964. Success of pink salmon spawning relative to size of spawning bed materials. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Special Scientific Report - Fisheries 469.
21. Micheli ER, Kirchner JW. 2002. Effects of wet meadow riparian vegetation on streambank erosion. 2. Measurements of vegetated bank strength and consequences for failure mechanics. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27(7): 687-697.
22. Murray AB, Paola C. 2003. Modelling the effect of vegetation on channel pattern in braided rivers. Earth Surface Processes Landforms 28: 131-143. DOI: 10.1002/esp.428.
23. Noble MG. 1979. The origin of Populus deltoides and Salix interior zones on point bars along the Minnesota River. The American Midland Naturalist 102: 59-67.
24. O'Connor JE, Jones MA, Haluska TL. 2003. Flood plain and channel dynamics of the Quinault and Queets Rivers, Washington, USA. Geomorphology 51: 31-59.
25. Phillips RW, Lantz RL, Claire EW, Moring JR. 1975. Some Effects of Gravel Mixtures on Emergence of Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout Fry. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 104(3): 461-466.
26. Read RA. 1958. Silvical characteristics of plains cottonwood. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Paper 33.
27. Rosgen DL. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology: Pagosa Springs, CO.
28. Schmidt JC, Webb RH, Valdez RA, Marzolf GR, Stevens LE. 1998. Science and values in river restoration in the Grand Canyon. Bioscience 48: 735-747.
29. Simon A, Darby S. 1999. The nature and significance of incised river channels. In Incised River Channels: Processes, Forms, Engineering, and Management, Darby SE, Simon A (eds). John Wiley & Sons: New York; 3-18.
30. Stromberg J. 2001. Restoration of riparian vegetation in the south-western United States: importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. Journal of Arid Environments 49: 17-34.
31. Tal M, Paola C. 2007. Dynamic single-thread channels maintained by the interaction of flow and vegetation. Geology 35(4): 347-350. DOI: 10.1130/G23260A.1.
32. Tal M, Paola C. 2010. Effects of vegetation on channel morphodynamics: results and insights from laboratory experiments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 35: 1014-1028. DOI:10.1002/esp.1908.
33. Thompson DM. 2002. Long-term effect of instream habitat-improvement structures on channel morphology along the Blackledge and Salmon Rivers, Connecticut, USA. Environmental Management 29: 250-265.
34. Thorne CR. 1990. Effects of vegetation on riverbank erosion and stability. In Vegetation and Erosion: Processes and Environments, Thornes JB (ed). John Wiley & Sons: Chichester; 125-144.
35. UDWR. 2007. Strawberry River Restoration Phase III Project Proposal. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.
36. USDA Forest Service. 2004. Strawberry Watershed Restoration Report. USDA Forest Service, Uinta National Forest, Heber Ranger District, Heber, Utah. April 2004.
37. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2001. Status review for Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah).
38. Wilson RE. 1970. Succession in stands of Populus deltoides along the Missouri River in southwestern South Dakota. The American Midland Naturalist 83(2): 330-342.
39. Wohl E. 2008. Compromised rivers: understanding historical human impacts on rivers in the context of restoration. Ecology and Society 10(2): 2.
40. Woolsey S, Capelli F, Gonser T, Hoehn E, Hostmann M, Junker B, Paetzold A, Roulier C, Schweizer S, Tiegs SD, Rockner K, Weber C, Peter A. 2007. A strategy to assess river restoration success. Freshwater Biology 52: 752-769.