Projecting cumulative benefits of multiple river restoration projects: An example from the Sacramento-San Joaquin river system in California

Environmental Management

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 933-945

  Kondolf, G Mathias ^a   Angermeier, Paul L ^b   Cummins, Kenneth ^c   Dunne, Thomas ^d   Healey, Michael ^e   Kimmerer, Wim ^f   Moyle, Peter B ^g   Murphy, Dennis ^h   Patten, Duncan ⁱ   Railsback, Steve ^j   Reed, Denise J ^k   Spies, Robert ^l   Twiss, Robert ^m  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^f SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

ⁱ MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j Lang   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS   (United States)

^l Applied Marine Sciences   (United States)

^m NONE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Chinook salmon; Gravel augmentation; Restoration response curves; River restoration; Sacramento River; San Joaquin River

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; GRAVEL; RIVERS;

CHINOOK SALMON; GRAVEL AUGMENTATION; RESTORATION RESPONSE CURVES; RIVER RESTORATION; SACRAMENTO RIVER; SAN JOAQUIN RIVER;

RESTORATION;

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; GRAVEL; HABITAT RESTORATION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; JUVENILE; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIVER; SALMONID;

ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ELECTRONIC SPREADSHEET; FLOODPLAIN; MIGRATORY SPECIES; PREDATION; REVIEW; RIVER ECOSYSTEM; SALMON; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SACRAMENTO RIVER; SAN JOAQUIN RIVER; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 56549124060     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9162-y     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. M Anand RE Desrochers 2004 Quantification of restoration success using complex systems concepts and models Restoration Ecology 12 1 117 123
2. JS Baron NL Poff PL Angermeier CN Dahm PH Gleick NG Hairston Jr RB Jackson CA Johnston BD Richter AD Steinman 2002 Meeting ecological and societal needs for freshwater Ecological Applications 12 1247 1260
3. Bay Institute (1998) From the Sierra to the sea: the ecological history of the San Francisco Bay-Delta watershed. The Bay Institute of San Francisco, San Rafael, California
4. Bay Institute (2003) The Bay Institute ecological scorecard, San Francisco Bay index. The Bay Institute of San Francisco, San Rafael, California
5. ES Bernhardt MA Palmer JD Allan G Alexander K Barnes S Brooks J Carr S Clayton C Dahm J Follsted-Shah D Galat S Gloss P Goodwin D Hart B Hassett R Jenkinson S Katz GM Kondolf PS Lake R Lave JL Meyer TK O'Donnell L Pagano B Powell E Sudduth 2005 Sythesizing U.S. river restoration efforts Science 308 636 637
6. NR Bond PS Lake 2003 Local habitat restoration in streams: constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota Ecological Management and Restoration 4 3 193 198
7. N Bond PS Lake 2005 Ecological restoration and large-scale ecological disturbances: effects of drought on a stream habitat restoration experiment Restoration Ecology 13 39 48
8. CALFED Bay-Delta Program (2000) Strategic plan for ecosystem restoration. Sacramento
9. CALFED Bay-Delta Program (2005) Ecosystem restoration multi-year program plan (years 6-9) and annotated budget (year 5). DRAFT. June 16, 2005
10. California Department of Fish and Game (1987) The status of San Joaquin drainage Chinook salmon stocks, habitat conditions and natural production factors. Prepared for the State Water Resources Control Board Bay/Delta hearing process, exhibit 15
11. EA (EA Engineering, Science, and Technology) (1992) Fisheries studies report. In Report of the Turlock Irrigation District and Modesto Irrigation District pursuant to Article 39 of the license for the Don Pedro project (Project No. 2299) before the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (vol II)
12. Everest FH, Beschta RL, Scrivener JC, Koski KV, Sedell JR, Cederholm CJ (1987) Fine sediment and salmonid production: a paradox. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW (eds) Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. University of Washington, Institute of Forest Resources, Contribution No. 57. pp 98-142
13. SD Fretwell HL Lucas 1970 On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds Acta Biotheoretica 19 1 39
14. Grantham T, Christian-Smith J, Kondolf GM, Scheuer S (2008) A fresh perspective for managing water in California: insights from applying the European water framework directive to the Russian River. Available on line: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/WRCA/WRC/pubs_contri.html#208
15. CS Holling 1959 Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism Canadian Entomologist 91 385 398
16. Kondolf GM (1998) Environmental effects of aggregate extraction from river channels and floodplains. In: Bobrowsky P (ed) Aggregate resources: a global perspective. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 113-129
17. GM Kondolf 2000 Assessing salmonid spawning gravels Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129 262 281
18. GM Kondolf M Larson 1995 Historical channel analysis and its application to riparian and aquatic habitat restoration Aquatic Conservation. 5 109 126
19. Kondolf GM, Boulton A, O'Daniel S, Poole G, Rahel F, Stanley E, Wohl E, Bang A, Carlstrom J, Cristoni C, Huber H, Koljonen S, Louhi P, Nakamura K (2006) Process-based ecological river restoration: visualising three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecology and Society 11 (2):5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art5/
20. GR Marzolf RA Valdez JC Schmidt RH Webb 1998 Perspectives on river restoration in the Grand Canyon Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 1998 250 254
21. McBain, Trush (2000) Habitat restoration plan for the Lower Tuolumne River corridor. Final report to the Tuolumne River Technical Advisory Committee, McBain and Trush, Arcata, California
22. Moyle PB (2002) Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley
23. PB Moyle JA Israel 2005 Untested assumptions: effectiveness of screening diversions for conservation of fish populations Fisheries 30 5 20 28
24. NRC (National Research Council) (2005) Drawing Louisiana's new map: addressing land loss in coastal Louisiana. National Academy Press, Washington
25. DA Sarr 2002 Riparian livestock exclosure research in the western United States: a critique and some recommendations Environmental Management 30 4 516 526
26. Scheuer S (2005) EU environmental policy handbook-A critical analysis of EU environmental legislation, published by the European Environmental Bureau, September 2005. Available online at http://www.eeb.org/publication/ policy_handbook.htm
27. Schmidt JC (2005) A general approach for establishing national priorities for river restoration, presentation to the American Geophysical Union Spring Meeting, May 2005, New Orleans
28. Stillwater Sciences (2002) Merced River corridor restoration plan. Stillwater Sciences, Berkeley, California