Epigenetic regulation of gene expression in porcine epiblast, hypoblast, trophectoderm and epiblast-derived neural progenitor cells

Epigenetics

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1149-1161

  Gao, Yu ^a,c   Jammes, Helen ^b,c   Rasmussen, Mikkel Aabech ^a   Oestrup, Olga ^a,d   Beaujean, Nathalie ^b,c   Hall, Vanessa ^a   Hyttel, Poul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^c ECOLE NATIONALE VÉTÉRINAIRE D ALFORT   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Blastocyst; DNA methylation; Gene expression; Lineage specification; Neural progenitor cells; Pluripotency marker; Porcine

Indexed keywords

OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; VIMENTIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPG ISLAND; DERIVATIZATION; DNA METHYLATION; DNA MODIFICATION; DOWN REGULATION; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REPRESSION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HYPOBLAST; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROMOTER REGION; SWINE; TROPHECTODERM; UPREGULATION;

SUS;

EID: 80052628212     PISSN: 15592294     EISSN: 15592308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.9.16954     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Brons IG, Smithers LE, Trotter MW, Rugg-Gunn P, Sun B, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 2007; 448:191-5.
2. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998; 282:1145-7.
3. Tesar PJ, Chenoweth JG, Brook FA, Davies TJ, Evans EP, Mack DL, et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 2007; 448:196-9.
4. Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78:7634-8.
5. Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K, Niwa H, Klewe-Nebenius D, Chambers I, et al. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 1998; 95:379-91.
6. Palmieri SL, Peter W, Hess H, Scholer HR. Oct-4 transcription factor is differentially expressed in the mouse embryo during establishment of the first two extraembryonic cell lineages involved in implantation. Dev Biol 1994; 166:259-67.
7. Cauffman G, Van de Velde H, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A. Oct-4 mRNA and protein expression during human preimplantation development. Mol Hum Reprod 2005; 11:173-81.
8. Hansis C, Grifo JA, Krey LC. Oct-4 expression in inner cell mass and trophectoderm of human blastocysts. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6:999-1004.
9. Kirchhof N, Carnwath JW, Lemme E, Anastassiadis K, Scholer H, Niemann H. Expression pattern of Oct-4 in preimplantation embryos of different species. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1698-705.
10. Hall VJ, Christensen J, Gao Y, Schmidt MH, Hyttel P. Porcine pluripotency cell signaling develops from the inner cell mass to the epiblast during early development. Dev Dyn 2009; 238:2014-24.
11. Keefer CL, Pant D, Blomberg L, Talbot NC. Challenges and prospects for the establishment of embryonic stem cell lines of domesticated ungulates. Anim Reprod Sci 2007; 98:147-68.
12. Yuan H, Corbi N, Basilico C, Dailey L. Developmental-specific activity of the FGF-4 enhancer requires the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3. Genes Dev 1995; 9:2635-45.
13. Avilion AA, Nicolis SK, Pevny LH, Perez L, Vivian N, Lovell-Badge R. Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev 2003; 17:126-40.
14. Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M, Nichols J, Lee S, Tweedie S, et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2003; 113:643-55.
15. Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, Takahashi K, et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 2003; 113:631-42.
16. Strumpf D, Mao CA, Yamanaka Y, Ralston A, Chawengsaksophak K, Beck F, et al. Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 2005; 132:2093-102.
17. Niwa H, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Strumpf D, Takahashi K, Yagi R, et al. Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 2005; 123:917-29.
18. Masui S, Nakatake Y, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Yagi R, Takahashi K, et al. Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:625-35.
19. Nishioka N, Yamamoto S, Kiyonari H, Sato H, Sawada A, Ota M, et al. Tead4 is required for specification of trophectoderm in pre-implantation mouse embryos. Mech Dev 2008; 125:270-83.
20. Ng RK, Dean W, Dawson C, Lucifero D, Madeja Z, Reik W, et al. Epigenetic restriction of embryonic cell lineage fate by methylation of Elf5. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:1280-90.
21. Blomberg LA, Schreier LL, Talbot NC. Expression analysis of pluripotency factors in the undifferentiated porcine inner cell mass and epiblast during in vitro culture. Mol Reprod Dev 2008; 75:450-63.
22. Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3:662-73.
23. Shiota K, Kogo Y, Ohgane J, Imamura T, Urano A, Nishino K, et al. Epigenetic marks by DNA methylation specific to stem, germ and somatic cells in mice. Genes Cells 2002; 7:961-9.
24. Farthing CR, Ficz G, Ng RK, Chan CF, Andrews S, Dean W, et al. Global mapping of DNA methylation in mouse promoters reveals epigenetic reprogramming of pluripotency genes. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:1000116.
25. Lan J, Hua S, Zhang H, Song Y, Liu J, Zhang Y Methylation patterns in 5' terminal regions of pluripotency-related genes in bovine in vitro fertilized and cloned embryos. J Genet Genomics 2010; 37:297-304.
26. Hattori N, Nishino K, Ko YG, Ohgane J, Tanaka S, Shiota K. Epigenetic control of mouse Oct-4 gene expression in embryonic stem cells and trophoblast stem cells. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:17063-9.
27. Gidekel S, Bergman Y. A unique developmental pattern of Oct-3/4 DNA methylation is controlled by a cis-demodification element. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:34521-30.
28. Hattori N, Imao Y, Nishino K, Ohgane J, Yagi S, Tanaka S, et al. Epigenetic regulation of Nanog gene in embryonic stem and trophoblast stem cells. Genes Cells 2007; 12:387-96.
29. Kimura H, Tada M, Nakatsuji N, Tada T. Histone code modifications on pluripotential nuclei of reprogrammed somatic cells. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:5710-20.
30. Byrne JA, Simonsson S, Western PS, Gurdon JB. Nuclei of adult mammalian somatic cells are directly reprogrammed to oct-4 stem cell gene expression by amphibian oocytes. Curr Biol 2003; 13:1206-13.
31. Freberg CT, Dahl JA, Timoskainen S, Collas P. Epigenetic reprogramming of OCT4 and NANOG regulatory regions by embryonal carcinoma cell extract. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:1543-53.
32. Marikawa Y, Fujita TC, Alarcon VB. Heterogeneous DNA methylation status of the regulatory element of the mouse Oct4 gene in adult somatic cell population. Cloning Stem Cells 2005; 7:8-16.
33. Borgel J, Guibert S, Li Y, Chiba H, Schubeler D, Sasaki H, et al. Targets and dynamics of promoter DNA methylation during early mouse development. Nat Genet 2010; 42:1093-100.
34. Donnison M, Beaton A, Davey HW, Broadhurst R, L'Huillier P, Pfeffer PL. Loss of the extraembryonic ectoderm in Elf5 mutants leads to defects in embryonic patterning. Development 2005; 132:2299-308.
35. Hemberger M, Udayashankar R, Tesar P, Moore H, Burton GJ. ELF5-enforced transcriptional networks define an epigenetically regulated trophoblast stem cell compartment in the human placenta. Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19:2456-67.
36. Wang K, Chen Y, Chang EA, Knott JG, Cibelli JB. Dynamic epigenetic regulation of the Oct4 and Nanog regulatory regions during neural differentiation in rhesus nuclear transfer embryonic stem cells. Cloning Stem Cells 2009; 11:483-96.
37. Deb-Rinker P, Ly D, Jezierski A, Sikorska M, Walker PR. Sequential DNA methylation of the Nanog and Oct-4 upstream regions in human NT2 cells during neuronal differentiation. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:6257-60.
38. Rasmussen MA, Hall VJ, Carter TF, Hyttel P. Directed differentiation of porcine epiblast-derived neural progenitor cells into neurons and glia. Stem Cell Res 2011; 7:124-36.
39. Notarianni E, Laurie S, Moor RM, Evans MJ. Maintenance and differentiation in culture of pluripotential embryonic cell lines from pig blastocysts. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1990; 41:51-6.
40. Vackova I, Ungrova A, Lopes F. Putative embryonic stem cell lines from pig embryos. J Reprod Dev 2007; 53:1137-49.
41. Talbot NC, Blomberg le A. The pursuit of ES cell lines of domesticated ungulates. Stem Cell Rev 2008; 4:235-54.
42. Telugu BP, Ezashi T, Roberts RM. The promise of stem cell research in pigs and other ungulate species. Stem Cell Rev 2010; 6:31-41.
43. Hall VJ, Jacobsen JV, Rasmussen MA, Hyttel P. Ultrastructural and molecular distinctions between the porcine inner cell mass and epiblast reveal unique pluripotent cell states. Dev Dyn 2010; 239:2911-20.
44. Bian Y, Alberio R, Allegrucci C, Campbell KH, Johnson AD. Epigenetic marks in somatic chromatin are remodelled to resemble pluripotent nuclei by amphibian oocyte extracts. Epigenetics 2009; 4:194-202.
45. Miyamoto K, Tsukiyama T, Yang Y, Li N, Minami N, Yamada M, et al. Cell-free extracts from mammalian oocytes partially induce nuclear reprogramming in somatic cells. Biol Reprod 2009; 80:935-43.
46. Wroclawska E, Brant JO, Yang TP, Moore K. Improving efficiencies of locus-specific DNA methylation assessment for bovine in vitro produced embryos. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2010; 56:96-105.
47. Zhang YL, Chen T, Jiang Y, Zhong ZS, Liu SZ, Hou Y, et al. Active demethylation of individual genes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection rabbit embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2005; 72:530-3.
48. Wolf XA, Serup P, Hyttel P. Three-dimensional localisation of NANOG, OCT4 and E-CADHERIN in porcine pre-and peri-implantation embryos. Dev Dyn 2011; 240:204-10.
49. Chazaud C, Yamanaka Y, Pawson T, Rossant J. Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Dev Cell 2006; 10:615-24.
50. Niwa H. How is pluripotency determined and maintained? Development 2007; 134:635-46.
51. Kuijk EW, Du Puy L, Van Tol HT, Oei CH, Haagsman HP, Colenbrander B, et al. Differences in early lineage segregation between mammals. Dev Dyn 2008; 237:918-27.
52. Dahl JA, Reiner AH, Klungland A, Wakayama T, Collas P. Histone H3 lysine 27 methylation asymmetry on developmentally-regulated promoters distinguish the first two lineages in mouse preimplantation embryos. PLoS One 2010; 5:9150.
53. Gao Y, Hyttel P, Hall VJ. Regulation of H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 during early porcine embryonic development. Mol Reprod Dev 2010; 77:540-9.
54. Kim H, Jang MJ, Kang MJ, Han YM. Epigenetic signatures and temporal expression of lineage-specific genes in hESCs during differentiation to hepatocytes in vitro. Hum Mol Genet 2010.
55. Feldman N, Gerson A, Fang J, Li E, Zhang Y, Shinkai Y, et al. G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:188-94.
56. Yeo S, Jeong S, Kim J, Han JS, Han YM, Kang YK. Characterization of DNA methylation change in stem cell marker genes during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007; 359:536-42.
57. Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007; 128:693-705.
58. Fuhrmann G, Sylvester I, Scholer HR. Repression of Oct-4 during embryonic cell differentiation correlates with the appearance of TRIF, a transiently induced DNA-binding factor. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 1999; 45:717-24.
59. Schones DE, Cui K, Cuddapah S, Roh TY, Barski A, Wang Z, et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 2008; 132:887-98.
60. Zlatanova J, Thakar A. H2A. Z: view from the top. Structure 2008; 16:166-79.
61. Svotelis A, Gevry N, Gaudreau L. Regulation of gene expression and cellular proliferation by histone H2A.Z. Biochem Cell Biol 2009; 87:179-88.
62. He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet 2004; 5:522-31.
63. Vejlsted M, Du Y, Vajta G, Maddox-Hyttel P. Posthatching development of the porcine and bovine embryo-defining criteria for expected development in vivo and in vitro. Theriogenology 2006; 65:153-65.
64. Van Poucke M, Vandesompele J, Mattheeuws M, Van Zeveren A, Peelman LJ. A dual fluorescent multiprobe assay for prion protein genotyping in sheep. BMC Infect Dis 2005; 5:13.
65. Kuijk EW, du Puy L, van Tol HT, Haagsman HP, Colenbrander B, Roelen BA. Validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR studies in porcine oocytes and preimplantation embryos. BMC Dev Biol 2007; 7:58.
66. Nygard AB, Jorgensen CB, Cirera S, Fredholm M. Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in pig tissues using SYBR green qPCR. BMC Mol Biol 2007; 8:67.
67. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 2002; 3:34.