Overall prestige of journals with ranking score above a given threshold

Scientometrics

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 229-243

  Garcia J A ^a   Rodriguez Sánchez, Rosa ^a   Fdez Valdivia, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Axiomatic index; First quartile journals; Longitudinal analysis; Overall prestige; Publication analysis; Ranking methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052615452     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0442-6     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bergstrom C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College and Research Libraries News, 68(5), 314-316.
2. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., & van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669-687.
3. Bornmann, L. (2010). Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 440-443.
4. Chakravarty, S. R. (1983). A new index of poverty. Mathematical Social Sciences, 6, 307-313.
5. Garcia, J. A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2011). The prestige gap of journals below a given threshold. The Journal of Informetrics (Submitted).
6. Garfield E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 295 (1), 90-93.
7. González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F., (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 379-391.
8. Kalaitzidakis, P., Stengos, T., & Mamuneas, T. P. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1346-1366.
9. Kapeller, J. (2010). Some critical notes on citation metrics and heterodox economics. Review of Radical Political Economics, 42(3), 330-337.
10. Kelchtermans, S., & Veugelers, R. (2011). The great divide in scientific productivity: Why the average scientist does not exist. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(1), 295-336.
11. Kodrzycki, Y. K., & Yu, P. (2006). New approaches to ranking economics journals. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 5(1), Art. 24.
12. Lee, J., Cassano-Pinche, A., & Vicente, K. J. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of human factors (1970-2000): A quantitative description of scientific impact. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47(4), 753-766.
13. Leydesdorff, L., Moya-Anegón, F., & Guerrero-Bote, V. P. (2010). Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the journal citation reports of the ISI. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 352-369.
14. Liebowitz Stanley, J., & Palmer, J. P. (1984). Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 1, 77-88.
15. Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 800-810.
16. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 5, 56-63.
17. Moed, H. F. (2010). CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 436-438.
18. Opthof, T., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010) Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS Leiden evaluations of research performance original research article. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 423-430.
19. Palacios-Huerta I., & Volij O. (2004). The measurement of intellectual influence. Econometrica, 72(3), 963-977.
20. Peichl, A., Schaefer, T., & Scheicher, C. (2008). Measuring richness and poverty: A micro data application to Europe and Germany. IZA Discussion Paper no. 3790.
21. Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications. Information Processing and Management, 12, 297-312.
22. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past Quarter Century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641-720.
23. Rousseau, R., & van Hooydonk, G. (1996). Journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 775-780.
24. Rousseau, S., Verbeke, T., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Evaluating environmental and resource economics journals: A TOP-curve approach. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(2), 270-287.
25. SCImago Research Group. SCImago Journal and Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.co.
26. Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44(2), 219-231.
27. Spaan, J. A. E. (2010). The danger of pseudoscience in Informetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 439-440.
28. Takayama, N. (1979). Poverty, income inequality, and their measures: Professor Sen's axiomatic approach reconsidered. Econometrica, 47(3), 747-759.
29. The Scopus website. http://www.scopus.com. Accessed February 2011.
30. van Raan Anton, F. J. (2004). Measuring science. In: F. Moed Henk, G. Wolfgang, & S. Ulrich (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19-50). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
31. van Raan, A. F. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff original research article. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 431-435.