A comparative physical map reveals the pattern of chromosomal evolution between the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) and chicken (Gallus gallus) genomes

BMC Genomics

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Zhang, Yang ^a   Zhang, Xiaojun ^a   O'Hare, Thomas H ^b   Payne, William S ^c   Dong, Jennifer J ^a   Scheuring, Chantel F ^a   Zhang, Meiping ^a   Huang, James J ^a   Lee, Mi Kyung ^a   Delany, Mary E ^b   Zhang, Hong Bin ^a   Dodgson, Jerry B ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL GENETICS; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; BREEDING; CENTROMERE; CHICKEN; CHROMOSOME INVERSION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTIG MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE MAPPING; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GENOME ANALYSIS; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; TELOMERE; TURKEY (BIRD); UNINDEXED SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; GENE LIBRARY; GENOMICS;

AVES; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GALLUS GALLUS; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; PHASIANIDAE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHICKENS; CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL, BACTERIAL; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTIG MAPPING; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GENOMIC LIBRARY; GENOMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TURKEYS;

EID: 80052596511     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-447     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. FAO FAOSTAT: Production Database. FAO., http://faostat.fao.org/
2. Dimcheff DE, Drovetski SV, Mindell DP. Phylogeny of Tetraoninae and other galliform birds using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2002, 24:203-215. 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00230-0, 12144757.
3. van Tuinen M, Dyke GJ. Calibration of galliform molecular clocks using multiple fossils and genetic partitions. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2004, 30:74-86. 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00164-7, 15022759.
4. Shibusawa M, Nishibori M, Nishida-Umehara C, Tsudzuki M, Masabanda J, Griffin DK, Matsuda Y. Karyotypic evolution in the Galliformes: An examination of the process of karyotypic evolution by comparison of the molecular cytogenetic findings with the molecular phylogeny. Cytogenet Genome Res 2004, 106:111-119. 10.1159/000078570, 15218250.
5. Hillier LW, Miller W, Birney E, Warren W, Hardison RC, Ponting CP, Bork P, Burt DW, Groenen MAM, Delany ME, et al. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 2004, 432:695-716. 10.1038/nature03154, 15592404.
6. Mozo T, Dewar K, Dunn P, Ecker JR, Fischer S, Kloska S, Lehrach H, Marra M, Martienssen R, Meier-Ewert S, et al. A complete BAC-based physical map of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Nat Genet 1999, 22:271-275. 10.1038/10334, 10391215.
7. McPherson JD, Marra M, Hillier L, Waterston RH, Chinwalla A, Wallis J, Sekhon M, Wylie K, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, et al. A physical map of the human genome. Nature 2001, 409:934-941. 10.1038/35057157, 11237014.
8. Gregory SG, Sekhon M, Schein J, Zhao SY, Osoegawa K, Scott CE, Evans RS, Burridge PW, Cox TV, Fox CA, et al. A physical map of the mouse genome. Nature 2002, 418:743-750. 10.1038/nature00957, 12181558.
9. Wallis JW, Aerts J, Groenen MAM, Crooijmans RPMA, Layman D, Graves TA, Scheer DE, Kremitzki C, Fedele MJ, Mudd NK, et al. A physical map of the chicken genome. Nature 2004, 432:761-764. 10.1038/nature03030, 15592415.
10. Wu CC, Sun S, Lee M, Xu Z, Ren C, Santos T, Zhang H. Whole-genome physical mapping: an overview on methods for DNA fingerprinting. The Handbook of Plant Genome Mapping: Genetic and Physical Mapping 2005, 257-284. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Meksem K, Kahl G.
11. Zhang HB. Map-based cloning of genes and quantitative trait loci. Principles and Practices of Plant Genomics. Volume 1. Genome Mapping 2008, 229-267. Enfield: Science Publishers, Kole C, Abbott A.
12. Haussler D, O'Brien SJ, Ryder OA, Barker FK, Clamp M, Crawford AJ, Hanner R, Hanotte O, Johnson WE, McGuire JA, et al. Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10 000 vertebrate species. J Hered 2009, 100:659-674. 2877544, 19892720.
13. Dalloul RA, Long JA, Zimin AV, Aslam L, Beal K, Ann Blomberg L, Bouffard P, Burt DW, Crasta O, Crooijmans RP, et al. Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:9.
14. Li R, Fan W, Tian G, Zhu H, He L, Cai J, Huang Q, Cai Q, Li B, Bai Y, et al. The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature 2010, 463:311-317. 10.1038/nature08696, 20010809.
15. Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H, Arnold AP, Hillier LW, Kunstner A, Searle S, White S, Vilella AJ, Fairley S, et al. The genome of a songbird. Nature 2010, 464:757-762. 10.1038/nature08819, 20360741.
16. Fujiyama A, Watanabe H, Toyoda A, Taylor TD, Itoh T, Tsai SF, Park HS, Yaspo ML, Lehrach H, Chen Z, et al. Construction and analysis of a human-chimpanzee comparative clone map. Science 2002, 295:131-134. 10.1126/science.1065199, 11778049.
17. Larkin DM, Everts-van der Wind A, Rebeiz M, Schweitzer PA, Bachman S, Green C, Wright CL, Campos EJ, Benson LD, Edwards J, et al. A cattle-human comparative map built with cattle BAC-ends and human genome sequence. Genome Res 2003, 13:1966-1972. 403790, 12902387.
18. Roberto R, Capozzi O, Wilson RK, Mardis ER, Lomiento M, Tuzun E, Cheng Z, Mootnick AR, Archidiacono N, Rocchi M, et al. Molecular refinement of gibbon genome rearrangements. Genome Res 2007, 17:249-257. 10.1101/gr.6052507, 1781357, 17185643.
19. Wei F, Coe E, Nelson W, Bharti AK, Engler F, Butler E, Kim H, Goicoechea JL, Chen M, Lee S, et al. Physical and genetic structure of the maize genome reflects its complex evolutionary history. PLoS Genet 2007, 3:1254-1263.
20. Gu YQ, Ma YQ, Huo NX, Vogel JP, You FM, Lazo GR, Nelson WM, Soderlund C, Dvorak J, Anderson OD, et al. A BAC-based physical map of Brachypodium distachyon and its comparative analysis with rice and wheat. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:563. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-563, 3087558, 19943974.
21. Burt DW, Morrice DR, Sewalem A, Smith J, Paton IR, Smith EJ, Bentley J, Hocking PM. Preliminary linkage map of the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) based on microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 2003, 34:399-409. 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.01033.x, 14687069.
22. Harry DE, Zaitlin D, Marini PJ, Reed KM. A first-generation map of the turkey genome. Genome 2003, 46:914-924. 10.1139/g03-042, 14608408.
23. Axelsson E, Webster MT, Smith NG, Burt DW, Ellegren H. Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes. Genome Res 2005, 15:120-125. 10.1101/gr.3021305, 540272, 15590944.
24. Reed KM, Chaves LD, Hall MK, Knutson TP, Harry DE. A comparative genetic map of the turkey genome. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005, 111:118-127. 10.1159/000086380, 16103652.
25. Reed KM, Chaves LD, Mendoza KM. An integrated and comparative genetic map of the turkey genome. Cytogenet Genome Res 2007, 119:113-126. 10.1159/000109627, 18160790.
26. Aslam ML, Bastiaansen JWM, Crooijmans RPMA, Vereijken A, Megens HJ, Groenen MAM. A SNP based linkage map of the turkey genome reveals multiple intrachromosomal rearrangements between the turkey and chicken genomes. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:647. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-647, 3091770, 21092123.
27. Soderlund C, Humphray S, Dunham A, French L. Contigs built with fingerprints, markers, and FPC V4.7. Genome Res 2000, 10:1772-1787. 10.1101/gr.GR-1375R, 310962, 11076862.
28. Chang YL, Tao QZ, Scheuring C, Ding KJ, Meksem K, Zhang HB. An integrated map of Arabidopsis thaliana for functional analysis of its genome sequence. Genetics 2001, 159:1231-1242. 1461882, 11729165.
29. Tao QZ, Chang YL, Wang JZ, Chen HM, Islam-Faridi MN, Scheuring C, Wang B, Stelly DM, Zhang HB. Bacterial artificial chromosome-based physical map of the rice genome constructed by restriction fingerprint analysis. Genetics 2001, 158:1711-1724. 1461754, 11514457.
30. Ren C, Lee MK, Yan B, Ding K, Cox B, Romanov MN, Price JA, Dodgson JB, Zhang HB. A BAC-based physical map of the chicken genome. Genome Res 2003, 13:2754-2758. 10.1101/gr.1499303, 403818, 14656976.
31. Wu CC, Nimmakayala P, Santos FA, Springman R, Scheuring C, Meksem K, Lightfoot DA, Zhang HB. Construction and characterization of a soybean bacterial artificial chromosome library and use of multiple complementary libraries for genome physical mapping. Theor Appl Genet 2004, 109:1041-1050. 10.1007/s00122-004-1712-y, 15164176.
32. Wu CC, Sun SK, Nimmakayala P, Santos FA, Meksem K, Springman R, Ding K, Lightfoot DA, Zhang HB. A BAC and BIBAC-based physical map of the soybean genome. Genome Res 2004, 14:319-326. 10.1101/gr.1405004, 327108, 14718376.
33. Xu ZY, Sun SK, Covaleda L, Ding K, Zhang AM, Wu CC, Scheuring C, Zhang HB. Genome physical mapping with large-insert bacterial clones by fingerprint analysis: methodologies, source clone genome coverage, and contig map quality. Genomics 2004, 84:941-951. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.08.014, 15533711.
34. Xu ZY, van den Berg MA, Scheuring C, Covaleda L, Lu H, Santos FA, Uhm T, Lee MK, Wu CC, Liu S, et al. Genome physical mapping from large-insert clones by fingerprint analysis with capillary electrophoresis: a robust physical map of Penicillium chrysogenum. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:e50. 10.1093/nar/gni037, 1065262, 15767275.
35. Bellott DW, Skaletsky H, Pyntikova T, Mardis ER, Graves T, Kremitzki C, Brown LG, Rozen S, Warren WC, Wilson RK, et al. Convergent evolution of chicken Z and human X chromosomes by expansion and gene acquisition. Nature 2010, 466:612-616. 10.1038/nature09172, 2943333, 20622855.
36. Gordon L, Yang S, Tran-Gyamfi M, Baggott D, Christensen M, Hamilton A, Crooijmans R, Groenen M, Lucas S, Ovcharenko I, et al. Comparative analysis of chicken chromosome 28 provides new clues to the evolutionary fragility of gene-rich vertebrate regions. Genome Res 2007, 17:1603-1613. 10.1101/gr.6775107, 2045143, 17921355.
37. Reed KM, Bauer MM, Monson MS, Benoit B, Chaves LD, O'Hare TH, Delany ME. Defining the turkey MHC: identification of expressed class I and class IIB-like genes independent of the MHC-B. Immunogenetics
38. Zlotina A, Galkina S, Krasikova A, Crooijmans RPMA, Groenen MAM, Gaginskaya E, Deryusheva S. Precise centromere positioning on chicken chromosome 3. Cytogenet Genome Res 2010, 129:310-313. 10.1159/000314923, 20606388.
39. Griffin DK, Robertson LB, Tempest HG, Vignal A, Fillon V, Crooijmans RP, Groenen MA, Deryusheva S, Gaginskaya E, Carre W, et al. Whole genome comparative studies between chicken and turkey and their implications for avian genome evolution. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:168. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-168, 2375447, 18410676.
40. Benkel BF, Nguyen T, Uno Y, Ponce de Leon FA, Hickey DA. Structural organization and chromosomal location of the chicken alpha-amylase gene family. Gene 2005, 362:117-124.
41. Dodgson JB, Delany ME, Cheng HH. Poultry genome sequences: progress and outstanding challenges. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011, 134:19-26. 10.1159/000324413, 21335957.
42. Shang WH, Hori T, Toyoda A, Kato J, Popendorf K, Sakakibara Y, Fujiyama A, Fukagawa T. Chickens possess centromeres with both extended tandem repeats and short non-tandem-repetitive sequences. Genome Res 2010, 20:1219-1228. 10.1101/gr.106245.110, 2928500, 20534883.
43. Humphray SJ, Scott CE, Clark R, Marron B, Bender C, Camm N, Davis J, Jenks A, Noon A, Patel M, et al. A high utility integrated map of the pig genome. Genome Biol 2007, 8:R139. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r139, 2323232, 17625002.
44. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei FS, Pasternak S, Liang CZ, Zhang JW, Fulton L, Graves TA, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 2009, 326:1112-1115. 10.1126/science.1178534, 19965430.
45. Burt DW, Bruley C, Dunn IC, Jones CT, Ramage A, Law AS, Morrice DR, Paton IR, Smith J, Windsor D, et al. The dynamics of chromosome evolution in birds and mammals. Nature 1999, 402:411-413. 10.1038/46555, 10586880.
46. Griffin DK, Robertson LBW, Tempest HG, Skinner BM. The evolution of the avian genome as revealed by comparative molecular cytogenetics. Cytogenet Genome Res 2007, 117:64-77. 10.1159/000103166, 17675846.
47. Ren C, Xu Z, Sun S, Lee M, Wu C, Scheuring C, Santos T, Zhang H. Genomic DNA libraries and physical mapping. The Handbook of Plant Genome Mapping: Genetic and Physical Mapping 2005, 173-213. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Meksem K, Kahl G.
48. Zhang HB, Scheuring C, Dong J, Wu C, Zhang M, Zhang X, Zhang Y. Handbook of Megabase-sized Recombinant DNA Technology: Construction and Manipulation of Bacteria-based Large-insert DNA Libraries 2008, College Station: Texas A&M University.
49. Children's Hospital of Oakland Research Institute BACPAC Resources Center. , http://bacpac.chori.org
50. Laboratory for Plant Genomics and GENEfinder Genomic Resources. , http://hbz7.tamu.edu
51. Sambrook J, Russell D. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual 2001, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
52. Gerdes T. ABI-ExportTabularData
53. Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 1998, 8:186-194.
54. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998, 8:175-185.
55. Smit A, Hubley R, Green P. RepeatMasker Open-3.0
56. Lee MK, Ren CW, Yan B, Cox B, Zhang HB, Romanov MN, Sizemore FG, Suchyta SP, Peters E, Dodgson JB. Construction and characterization of three BAC libraries for analysis of the chicken genome. Anim Genet 2003, 34:151-152. 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.00965_5.x, 12648103.
57. Romanov MN, Dodgson JB. Cross-species overgo hybridization and comparative physical mapping within avian genomes. Anim Genet 2006, 37:397-399. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01463.x, 16879356.
58. Romanov MN, Price JA, Dodgson JB. Integration of animal linkage and BAC contig maps using overgo hybridization. Cytogenet Genome Res 2003, 102:277-281. 10.1159/000075763, 14970717.
59. Romanov MN, Dodgson JB, Gonser RA, Tuttle EM. Comparative BAC-based mapping in the white-throated sparrow, a novel behavioral genomics model, using interspecies overgo hybridization. BMC Res Notes 2011, 4:211. 10.1186/1756-0500-4-211, 3155834, 21693052.
60. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990, 215:403-410.
61. Kent WJ. BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res 2002, 12:656-664. 187518, 11932250.
62. Delany ME, Gessaro TM, Rodrigue KL, Daniels LM. Chromosomal mapping of chicken mega-telomere arrays to GGA9, 16, 28 and W using a cytogenomic approach. Cytogenet Genome Res 2007, 117:54-63. 10.1159/000103165, 17675845.
63. Delany ME, Robinson CM, Goto RM, Miller MM. Architecture and organization of chicken microchromosome 16: order of the NOR, MHC-Y, and MHC-B subregions. J Hered 2009, 100:507-514. 10.1093/jhered/esp044, 19617522.
64. O'Hare TH, Delany ME. Genetic variation exists for telomeric array organization within and among the genomes of normal, immortalized, and transformed chicken systems. Chromosome Res 2009, 17:947-964. 10.1007/s10577-009-9082-6, 2793383, 19890728.
65. Robinson CM, Hunt HD, Cheng HH, Delany ME. Chromosomal integration of an avian oncogenic herpesvirus reveals telomeric preferences and evidence for lymphoma clonality. Herpesviridae 2010, 1:5. 10.1186/2042-4280-1-5, 3063227, 21429236.