ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Skotara, Nils ^a   Kügow, Monique ^a   Salden, Uta ^a   Hänel Faulhaber, Barbara ^a   Röder, Brigitte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ERROR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GERMANY; GRAMMAR; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; SEMANTICS; SIGN LANGUAGE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; CAUCASIAN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DEAFNESS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SIGN LANGUAGE;

EID: 80052590135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-48     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Knudsen EI. Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:1412-1425. 10.1162/0898929042304796, 15509387.
2. Weber-Fox CM, Neville HJ. Maturational constraints on functional specialization for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8:231-256.
3. De Groot AMB, Kroll JF. Tutorials in bilingualism:Psycholinguistic perspectives 1997, Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Wartenburger I, Heekeren HR, Abutalebi J, Cappa SF, Villringer A, Perani D. Early Setting of Grammatical Processing in the Bilingual Brain. Neuron 2003, 37:159-170. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01150-9, 12526781.
5. Lee HJ, Giraud AL, Kang E, Oh SH, Kang H, Kim CS, Lee DS. Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear imlantation outcome. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:909-917.
6. Perani D, Paulesu E, Galles NS, Dupoux E, Dehaene S, Bettinardi V, Cappa SF, Fazio F, Mehler J. The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain 1998, 121:1841-1852. 10.1093/brain/121.10.1841, 9798741.
7. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980, 207:203-205. 10.1126/science.7350657, 7350657.
8. Chwilla DJ, Brown CM, Hagoort P. The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology 1995, 32:274-285. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb02956.x, 7784536.
9. Holcomb PJ, Neville HJ. Nature speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials. Psychobiology 1991, 19:286-300.
10. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 1984, 307:161-163. 10.1038/307161a0, 6690995.
11. Hoeks JC, Stowe LA, Doedens G. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 19:59-73. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022, 14972359.
12. Kolk HH, Chwilla DJ, van Herten M, Oor PJ. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: a study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language 2003, 85:1-36. 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00548-5, 12681346.
13. Kuperberg GR, Sitnikova T, Caplan D, Holcomb PJ. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 17:117-129. 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00086-7, 12763198.
14. Kuperberg GR, Sitnikova T, Lakshmanan BM. Neuroanatomical distinctions within the semantic system during sentence comprehension: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2008, 40:367-388. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.009, 18248739.
15. Coulson S, King JW, Kutas M. Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes 1998, 13:21-58.
16. Friederici AD, Hahne A, Mecklinger A. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1219-1248.
17. Neville H, Nicol JL, Barss A, Forster KI, Garrett MF. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1991, 3:151-165.
18. Osterhout L, Mobley LA. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language 1995, 34:739-773.
19. Friederici AD. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:78-84. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01839-8, 15866191.
20. Felser C, Clahsen H, Munte TF. Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: an ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German. Brain and Language 2003, 87:345-354. 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00135-4, 14642537.
21. Rodriguez-Fornells A, Clahsen H, Lleo C, Zaake W, Munte TF. Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 11:47-58. 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00063-X, 11240111.
22. De Vincenzi M, Job R, Di Matteo R, Angrilli A, Penolazzi B, Ciccarelli L, Vespignani F. Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations. Brain and Language 2003, 85:280-296. 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00055-5, 12735945.
23. Münte TF, Matzke M, Johannes S. Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9:318-329.
24. Hagoort P, Brown C, Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 1993, 8:439-483.
25. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ, Swinney DA. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition 1994, 20:786-803.
26. Kaan E. Investigaing the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb dependencies: an ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2002, 31:165-193. 10.1023/A:1014978917769, 12022794.
27. Gross M, Say T, Kleingers M, Clahsen H, Munte TF. Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words. Neuroscience Letters 1998, 241:83-86. 10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00971-3, 9507926.
28. Weyerts H, Penke M, Munte TF, Heinze HJ, Clahsen H. Word order in sentence processing: an experimental study of verb placement in German. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2002, 31:211-268. 10.1023/A:1015588012457, 12092710.
29. Hahne A, Friederici AD. Processing a second language: Late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2001, 4.
30. Chen L, Shu H, Liu Y, Zhao J, Li P. ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2007, 10:161-174.
31. Ardila A. Language representation and working memory with bilinguals. Journal of Communication Disorders 2003, 36:233-240. 10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00022-4, 12742670.
32. Hasegawa M, Carpenter PA, Just MA. An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. Neuroimage 2002, 15:647-660. 10.1006/nimg.2001.1001, 11848708.
33. Ullman MA. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory, and Practice 2005, 141-178. University Press, Sanz C. Georgetown.
34. Osterhout L, McLaughlin J, Kim A, Greenwald R, Inoue K. Sentences in the brain: event-related potentials as real-time reflections of sentence comprehension and language learning. The online study of sentence comprehension eyetracking, ERP, and beyond 2004, 271-308. New York: Psychology Press, Carreiras MaCCHE, Jr.
35. Tokowicz N, MacWhinney B. Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2005, 27:173-204.
36. Hahne A, Mueller JL, Clahsen H. Morphological processing in a second language: behavioral and event-related brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:121-134. 10.1162/089892906775250067, 16417688.
37. Clahsen H, Felser C. How native-like is non-native language processing?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:564-570. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002, 17071131.
38. Rodriguez-Fornells A, De Diego Balaguer R, Münte TF. Executive control in bilingual language processing. The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition 2006, 133-190. Oxford: Blackwell, Gullberg M, Indefrey P.
39. Osterhout L, McLaughlin J, Pitkänen I, Frenck-Mestre C, Molinaro N. Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second-language processing. Language Learning 2006,
40. De Diego Balaguer R, Rodriguez-Fornells A. Contributions to the functional neuroanatomy of morphosyntactic processing in L2. Language Learning 2010, 60:231-259.
41. Clayton V, Ceil L. Linguistics of American sign language: an introduction 2000, Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 3.
42. Bavelier D, Newport EL, Supalla T. Signed or spoken, children need natural languages. Cerebrum 2003, 5:19-32.
43. Emmorey K, Reilly JS. Language, gesture and space 1995, Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
44. Goldin-Meadow S, Mayberry RI. How do profoundly deaf children learn to read?. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 2001, 16:222-229. 10.1111/0938-8982.00022, 21611985.
45. Newport EL, Maier RP. The Acquisition of American Sign Language. The Cross-Linguistic Study of Language Acquisition 1985, 881-938. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, D. Slobin.
46. MacSweeney M, Calvert GA, Campbell R, McGuire PK, David AS, Williams SC, Woll B, Brammer MJ. Speechreading circuits in people born deaf. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:801-807. 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00180-4, 11900730.
47. MacSweeney M, Campbell R, Woll B, Brammer MJ, Giampietro V, David AS, Calvert GA, McGuire PK. Lexical and sentential processing in British Sign Language. Human Brain Mapping 2006, 27:63-76. 10.1002/hbm.20167, 15966001.
48. Corina D. The processing of sign language: Evidence from aphasia. Handbook of neurolinguistics 1998, 313-329. San Diego: Academic Press.
49. Hickok G, Bellugi U, Klima ES. What's right about the neural organization of sign language? A perspective on recent neuroimaging results. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998, 2:465-467. 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01263-7, 21227293.
50. Capek CM, Grossi G, Newman AJ, McBurney SL, Corina D, Roeder B, Neville HJ. Brain systems mediating semantic and syntactic processing in deaf native signers: Biological invariance and modality specificity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106:8784-8789.
51. Neville HJ. Biological constraints on semantic processing: A comparison of spoken and signed languages. Psychophysiology 1985, 22:576.
52. Mitchell TV, Neville HJ. Effects of age and experience on the development of neurocognitive systems. The Cognitive Physiology of Mind 2002, Proverbio AM: Academic Press, Zani A.
53. Neville H, Bavelier D. Neural organization and plasticity of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1998, 8:254-258. 10.1016/S0959-4388(98)80148-7, 9635210.
54. Mayberry RI, Lock E. Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis. Brain and Language 2003, 87:369-384. 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00137-8, 14642540.
55. Mayberry RI, Lock E, Kazmi H. Linguistic ability and early language exposure. Nature 2002, 417:38. 10.1038/417038a, 11986658.
56. Kutas M, Neville HJ, Holcomb PJ. A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semantic anomalies during reading, listening and signing. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement 1987, 39:325-330.
57. Neville HJ, Mills DL, Lawson DS. Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex 1992, 2:244-258. 10.1093/cercor/2.3.244, 1511223.
58. van Herten M, Kolk HH, Chwilla DJ. An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 22:241-255. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.002, 15653297.
59. Buckley KA, Tobey EA. Cross-modal plasticity and speech perception in pre- and postlingually deaf cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 2011, 32:2-15.
60. Ojima S, Nakata H, Kakigi R. An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:1212-1228. 10.1162/0898929055002436, 16197679.
61. Poppendieker R. Freies Schreiben und Gebärden. Voraussetzungen und Bedingungen des Erwerbs von Schreibkompetenz durch gehörlose Kinder. Signum 1992,
62. Nett O, Wudtke H. Schriftspracherwerb: Schreibentwicklungen gehörloser Kinder III. Das Zeichen 1993, 26:462-470.
63. Wudtke H. Schriftspracherwerb: Schreibentwicklungen gehörloser Kinder I. Das Zeichen 1993, 24:212-223.
64. Wudtke H. Schriftspracherwerb: Schreibentwicklungen gehörloser Kinder II. Das Zeichen 1993, 25:332-341.
65. Chamberlaine C, Mayberry RI. American Sign Language syntactic and narrative comprehension in skilled and less skilled readers: Bilingual and bimodal evidence for the linguistic basis of reading. Applied Psycholinguistics 2008, 29:367-388.
66. Bryant P, Goswami U. Phonological skills and learning to read (Essays in Developmental Pychology) 1990, Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
67. Catts HW, Kamhi AG. The connections between language and reading disabbilities 2005, Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Osterhout L, Nicol J. On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes 1999, 14:283-317.